0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions

Study of Fuel Composition, Burner Material, and Tip Temperature Effects on Flashback of Enclosed Jet Flame

[+] Author and Article Information
Vincent McDonell

UCI Combustion Laboratory,
University of California,
Irvine, CA 92697-3550

Contributed by the Combustion and Fuels Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 3, 2013; final manuscript received July 22, 2013; published online September 20, 2013. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 135(12), 121504 (Sep 20, 2013) (10 pages) Paper No: GTP-13-1229; doi: 10.1115/1.4025129 History: Received July 03, 2013; Revised July 22, 2013

Flashback is a key challenge for low NOx premixed combustion of high hydrogen content fuels. Previous work on jet burner configurations has systematically investigated the impact of fuel composition on flashback propensity, and noted that burner tip temperature played an important role on flashback, yet did not quantify any specific effect (Shaffer, B., Duan, Z., and McDonell, V., 2013, “Study of Fuel Composition Effects on Flashback Using a Confined Jet Flame Burner,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turb. Power, 135(1), p. 011502). The present work further investigates the coupling of flashback with burner tip temperature and leads to models for flashback propensity as a function of parameters studied. To achieve this, a jet burner configuration with interchangeable burner materials was developed along with automated flashback detection and rim temperature monitoring. An inline heater provides preheated air up to 810 K. Key observations include that for a given condition, tip temperature of a quartz burner at flashback is higher than that of a stainless burner. As a result, the flashback propensity of a quartz tube is about double of that of a stainless tube. A polynomial model based on analysis of variance is presented and shows that, if the tip temperature is introduced as a parameter, better correlations result. A physical model is developed and illustrates that the critical velocity gradient is proportional to the laminar flame speed computed using the measured tip temperature. The addition of multiple parameters further refined the prediction of the flashback propensity, and the effects of materials are discussed qualitatively using a simple heat transfer analysis.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Lieuwen, T., McDonell, V., Santavicca, D., and Sattelmayer, T., 2008, “Burner Development and Operability Issues Associated With Steady Flowing Syngas Fired Combustors,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 180(6), pp. 1169–1192. [CrossRef]
Lewis, B., and von Elbe, G., 1943, “Stability and Structure of Burner Flames,” J. Chem. Phys., 11(2), pp. p. 75–97. [CrossRef]
von Elbe, G., and Mentser, M., 1945, “Further Studies of the Structure and Stability of Burner Flames,” J. Chem. Phys., 13(2), pp. 89–100. [CrossRef]
Wohl, K., 1953, “Quenching, Flash-Back, Blow-off-Theory And Experiment,”Symposium (International) on Combustion, 4(1), pp. 68–89 [CrossRef].
Putnam, A. A., and Jensen, R. A., 1949, “Application of Dimensionless Numbers to Flash-Back and Other Combustion Phenomena,” Symposium on Combustion and Flame, and Explosion Phenomena, 3(1), pp. 89–98. [CrossRef]
Grumer, J., 1949, “Predicting Burner Performance With Interchanged Fuel Gases,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 41(12), pp. 2756–2761. [CrossRef]
Grumer, J., and Harris, M. E., 1952, “Flame-Stability Limits of Methane, Hydrogen, and Carbon Monoxide Mixtures,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 44(7), pp. 1547–1553. [CrossRef]
Grumer, J. M., Harris, E., and Schultz, H., 1952, “Predicting Interchangeability of Fuel Gases. Interchangeability of Oil Gases or Propane-Air Fuels With Natural Gases,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 44(7), pp. 1554–1559. [CrossRef]
Grumer, J., and Harris, M. E., 1954, “Temperature Dependence of Stability Limits of Burner Flames,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 46(11), pp. 2424–2430. [CrossRef]
Grumer, J. M.,Harris, E., and Schultz, H.1955, “Flame- Stability Limits of Ethylene, Propane, Methane, Hydrogen, and Nitrogen Mixtures,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 47(9), pp. 1760–1767. [CrossRef]
Grumer, J. M., Harris, E., and Rowe, V., 1956, Fundamental Flashback, Blow Off, and Yellow-Tip Limits of Fuel Gas-Air Mixtures, United States Department of the Interior, ed., Bureau of Mines, Washington, DC.
Van Krevelen, D. W., and Chermin, H. A. G., 1958, “Generalized Flame Stability Diagram For The Prediction of Interchangeability of Gases,” Symposium (International) on Combustion, 7(1), pp. 358–368. [CrossRef]
Caffo, E., and Padovani, C., 1963, “Flashback in Premixed Air Flames,” Combust. Flame, 7(4), pp. 331–337. [CrossRef]
Putnam, A. A. D., Ball, A., and Levy, A., 1980, “Effect of Fuel Composition On Relation of Burning Velocity To Product of Quenching Distance And Flashback Velocity Gradient,” Combust. Flame, 37, pp. 193–196. [CrossRef]
Ball, D. A., Putnam, A. A., Radhakrishman, E., and Levy, A., 1978, “Relation of Burning Velocity, Quenching Distance, and Flashback Velocity Gradient for Low and Intermediate BTU Gases,” Battelle Columbus Laboratories, Columbus, OH.
Yamazaki, K., and Tsuji, H., 1961, “An Experimental Investigation On The Stability Of Turbulent Burner Flames,” Symposium (International) on Combustion, 8(1), pp. 543–553. [CrossRef]
Fine, B., 1957, “Stability Limits And Burning Velocities For Some Laminar And Turbulent Propane And Hydrogen Flames At Reduced Pressure,” NACA – Technical Note, (4031): 49.
Fine, B., 1958, “Flashback of Laminar and Turbulent Burner Flames at Reduced Pressure,” Combust. Flame, 2(3), pp. 253–266. [CrossRef]
Fine, B., 1959, “Effect of Initial Temperature on Flash Back of Laminar and Turbulent Burner Flames,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 51(4), pp. 564–566. [CrossRef]
Dugger, G. L., 1955, “Flame Stability of Preheated Propane-Air Mixtures,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 47(1), pp. 109–114. [CrossRef]
Khitrin, L. N., Moin, P. B., Smirnov, D. B., and Shevchuk, V. U., 1965, “Peculiarities of Laminar- and Turbulent-Flame Flashbacks,” Symposium (International) on Combustion, 10(1), pp. 1285–1291. [CrossRef]
Bollinger, L. E., and Edse, R., 1956, “Effect of Burner-Tip Temperature on Flash Back of Turbulent Hydrogen-Oxygen Flames,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 48(4), pp. 802–807. [CrossRef]
Kedia, K. S., and Ghoniem, A. F., 2012, “Mechanisms of Stabilization and Blowoff of a Premixed Flame Downstream of a Heat-Conducting Perforated Plate,” Combust. Flame, 159(3), pp. 1055–1069. [CrossRef]
Shaffer, B., Duan, Z., and McDonell, V., 2013, “Study of Fuel Composition Effects on Flashback Using a Confined Jet Flame Burner,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 135(1), p. 011502. [CrossRef]
Eichler, C., and Sattelmayer, T., 2011, “Experiments on Flame Flashback in a Quasi-2D Turbulent Wall Boundary Layer for Premixed Methane-Hydrogen-Air Mixtures,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 133(1), p. 011503. [CrossRef]
Eichler, C., Baumgartner, G., and Sattelmayer, T., 2012, “Experimental Investigation of Turbulent Boundary Layer Flashback Limits for Premixed Hydrogen-Air Flames Confined in Ducts,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(1), p. 011502. [CrossRef]
Lee, S. T., and Tien, J. S., 1982, “A Numerical-Analysis of Flame Flashback in a Premixed Laminar System,” Combust. Flame, 48(3), pp. 273–285. [CrossRef]
Kurdyumov, V. N., Fernández, E., and Liñán, A., 2000, “Flame Flashback and Propagation of Premixed Flames Near a Wall,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 28(2), pp. 1883–1889. [CrossRef]
Kurdyumov, V. N., Truffaut, J. M., Quinard, J., Wangher, A., and Searby, G., 2008, “Oscillations of Premixed Flames in Tubes Near the Flashback Conditions,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 180(5), pp. 731–742. [CrossRef]
Kurdyumov, V., Fernández-Tarrazo, E., Truffaut, J. M., Quinard, J., Wangher, A., and Searby, G., 2007, “Experimental and Numerical Study of Premixed Flame Flashback,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 31(1), pp. 1275–1282. [CrossRef]
Schlichting, H., and Gersten, K., 2004, Boundary-Layer Theory, Springer, New York.
Turns, S. R., 1996, An Introduction to Combustion: Concepts and Applications, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.
Kee, R. J., Smooke, M. D., and Miller, J. A., 1985, “A FORTRAN Program for Modeling Steady Laminar One-Dimensional Premixed Flames,” Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA, Report No. SAND85-8240.
Smith, G. P.Frenklach, M., Moriarty, N. W., Eiteneer, B., Goldenberg, M., Bowman, C. T., Hanson, R. K., Song, S., Gardiner, Jr., W. C., Lissianski, V. V., and Qin, Z., 2013, “GRI-Mech Home Page,” University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, available from http:// www.me.berkeley.edu/gri_mech/
Glassman, I., and Yetter, R. A., 2008, Combustion Elsevier, London.
Barnett, H. C., and Hibbard, R. R., 1957, Basic Considerations in the Combustion of Hydrocarbon Fuels With Air, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Washington, DC.
Incropera, F. P., and DeWitt, D. P., 2002, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, 5th ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Duan, Z., Baumgartner, G., Shaffer, B., McDonell, V., and Sattelmayer, T., 2013, “Influence of Burner Material, Tip Temperature And Geometrical Flame Configuration on Flashback Propensity of H2-Air Jet Flames,” ASME Turbo Expo 2013, San Antonio, TX, June 3-7, ASME Paper No. GT2013-94823.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Schematic of the thermocouple alignment

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic of the enclosure holder

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic of the axisymmetric single injector rig and associated supporting hardware

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Tip temperatures at FB versus inlet temperatures with different fuels, AFTs, and injector materials (a) quartz (b) stainless steel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of the definition of the critical velocity gradient [2]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Critical air flow rates versus inlet temperatures with different fuels, AFTs, and injector materials (a) quartz (b) stainless steel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Comparison of actual values versus predicted values by the multiparameter model (Eq. (20))

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Models predicting gc: quartz tube (blue diamonds) and stainless tube (red triangles)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Model predicting gc without consideration of material effects

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Schematic of the heat transfer within injector wall

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Models predicting gc with tip temperature instead of inlet temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Models predicting gc with tip temperature for nonpreheated cases

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Model of single parameter correlation (laminar flame speed based on tip temperature)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

gc versus the laminar flame speed calculated with tip temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Comparison of actual values versus predicted values by the multiparameter model (Eq. (21))

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Tip temperature of pure hydrogen flame without preheating

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In