RESEARCH PAPERS: Gas Turbines: Controls and Diagnostics

A New Approach to the Challenge of Machinery Prognostics

[+] Author and Article Information
R. J. Hansen, D. L. Hall

Applied Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 16804

S. K. Kurtz

Materials Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 117(2), 320-325 (Apr 01, 1995) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2814097 History: Received January 28, 1994; Online November 19, 2007


Current generation mechanical diagnostic equipment is designed to identify individual events or trends in the output of sensors mounted on a mechanical component, subsystem, or system. Such equipment can provide a useful indication that a failure condition may be developing, but it cannot provide reliable predictions of the remaining safe or operational life. Typically, these diagnostic systems simply compare the output of individual sensors against a priori thresholds to establish a measure of the system’s health. Two problems result from this approach: (1) There is no advantage taken of possible synergy among the sensors, i.e., the determination of health is one dimensional; and (2) the diagnosis provides only a statement regarding the current equipment health, but does not provide a prediction of the time remaining to failure. This often leads to an operational environment in which diagnostic equipment outputs are either ignored because of frequent false alarms or frequent (and costly) time-based preventive maintenance is performed to avoid hazardous failures. This paper describes a new approach to the development of a more robust diagnosis and prognostic capability. It is based on the fusion of sensor-based and model-based information. Sensor-based information is the essence of current diagnostic systems. Model-based information combines dynamic models of individual mechanical components with micromechanical models of relevant failure mechanisms, such as fracture and crack propagation. These micromechanical models must account for initial flaw size distribution and other microstructural parameters describing initial components condition. A specific application of this approach is addressed, the diagnosis of mechanical failure in meshing gears. Four specific issues are considered: (a) how to couple a validated numerical simulation of gear transmission error (due to tooth spacing irregularity, contour irregularity, or material inhomogeneity) with physically and empirically based descriptions of fatigue crack growth to predict a failure precursor signature at the component level; (b) how to predict the manifestation of this signature at the subsystem or system level where sensors are located; (c) how to fuse this model-based information with the corresponding sensor-based information to predict remaining safe or operational life of a gear; and (d) issues associated with extending this methodology to bearings and other rotating machinery components.

Copyright © 1995 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.





Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In