0
RESEARCH PAPERS: Gas Turbines: Structures and Dynamics

Experimental Rotordynamic Coefficient Results for (a) a Labyrinth Seal With and Without Shunt Injection and (b) a Honeycomb Seal

[+] Author and Article Information
E. A. Soto

Conjunto Gran Sabana, Edif. Auyantepuy, Apartamento PH-A, Calle Chile

D. W. Childs

Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 121(1), 153-159 (Jan 01, 1999) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2816303 History: Received April 01, 1998; Online November 19, 2007

Abstract

Centrifugal compressors are increasingly required to operate at higher pressures, speeds, and fluid density. In these conditions, compressors are susceptible to rotordynamic instabilities. To remedy this situation, labyrinth seals have sometimes been modified by using shunt injection. In shunt injection, the gas is taken from the diffuser or discharge volute and injected into an upstream chamber of the balance-piston labyrinth seal. The injection direction can be radial or against rotation. This study contains the first measured rotordynamic data for labyrinth seals with shunt injection. A comparison has been made between conventional labyrinth seals, labyrinth seals with shunt injection (radial and against rotation), and a honeycomb seal. Labyrinth seals with injection against rotation are better able to control rotordynamic instabilities than labyrinth seals with radial injection; however, the leakage is slightly higher. The leakage comparison for all seals demonstrates that the honeycomb seal has the best flow control. Test data are presented for a top rotor surface velocity of 110 m/sec, a supply pressure of 13.7 bars, and IPr = 0.95 (injection pressure is 1.05 = 1/0.95 times the seal inlet pressure). For these conditions, and considering effective damping, the labyrinth seal with injection against rotation is better than the honeycomb seal when the pressure ratio across the seal PR < 0.45. On the other hand, the honeycomb seal is better when PR > 0.45. The effectiveness of the shunt-injection against rotation in developing effective damping is reduced with increasing rotor surface velocity.

Copyright © 1999 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In