0
RESEARCH PAPERS: Gas Turbines: Manufacturing Materials and Metallurgy

Diffusion Bonding of CMSX-4 to UDIMET 720 Using PVD-Coated Interfaces and HIP

[+] Author and Article Information
R. Larker

Division of Engineering Materials, Lulea University of Technology, S-971 87 Lulea, Sweden

J. Ockborn, B. Selling

Materials Technology, Volvo Aero Corporation, S-461 81 Trollhattan, Sweden

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 121(3), 489-493 (Jul 01, 1999) (5 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2818499 History: Received March 31, 1998; Revised March 23, 1999; Online December 03, 2007

Abstract

There is an increasing interest in development of manufacturing methods for Dual Property BLISKs, consisting of creep resistant airfoils and fatigue resistant disks bonded together by a durable joint. Optimum heat treatments are, however, very different for creep resistant single crystal CMSX-4 and fatigue resistant polycrystalline Udimet 720 selected in this study, but fortunately the first aging treatment for CMSX-4 (1140°C, 2–6 h, AC) is similar to the partial solution treatment of U 720 HS2 (115°C, 4h, OQ). Based on this, diffusion bonding was performed by HIP at 1120°C and 200 MPa argon pressure for 4 h, followed by cooling to 400°C. Subsequently, a shortened Udimet 720 HS2 two-step aging treatment was adopted by heating to 650°C for 6 h followed by cooling to 400°C, heating to 760°C for 2 h, and finally cooling to R.T. under remaining HIP pressure. Plasma etching followed by thin (80 nm) PVD coating with either nickel or titanium were used to clean and protect the polished surfaces before joining. The selection of coatings was governed by the possibility to reduce oxidized nickel by flushing with hydrogen at 330°C during evacuation of the HIP capsules, and by the large solubility of oxygen in titanium. Hot tensile testing was performed at 750°C on both joined and reference materials subjected to the modified heat treatment. Initially solution treated Udimet 720 and CMSX-4 comprised the reference materials. The testing showed that joints with Ti-PVD coatings were almost as strong as Udimet 720 (although with very limited elongation), while the joints with Ti-PVD coatings were weaker.

Copyright © 1999 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In