0
TECHNICAL PAPERS: Gas Turbines: Combustion and Fuel

Experimental and Numerical Studies of Two-Stage Ethane-Air Flames

[+] Author and Article Information
M. M. Y. Waly, S. C. Li, F. A. Williams

Center for Energy and Combustion Research, Department of Applied Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0411

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 122(4), 651-658 (May 15, 2000) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1287164 History: Received March 09, 1999; Revised May 15, 2000
Copyright © 2000 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Reaction path for ethane in a two-stage ethane-air flame with equivalence ratio Φ=1.65 and strain rate a=90 s−1
Grahic Jump Location
Predicted concentration profiles of NO, CH, N, and HCN for strain rate a=90 s−1 at different equivalence ratios: (a) Φ=1.65; (b) Φ=1.85; (c) Φ=2.20; (d) Φ=2.65.
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison between measurement and prediction for concentration profiles of intermediate species C2H2 and computed concentration profiles of radicals H, OH, and O for strain rate a=90 s−1 at different equivalence ratios: (a) Φ=1.65; (b) Φ=1.85; (c) Φ=2.20; (d) Φ=2.65.
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison between measurement and prediction for concentration profiles of intermediate species C2H4 and computed concentration profiles of radicals H, OH, and O for strain rate a=90 s−1 at different equivalence ratios: (a) Φ=1.65; (b) Φ=1.85; (c) Φ=2.20; (d) Φ=2.65.
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison between measurement and prediction for concentration profiles of intermediate species CH4 and computed concentration profiles of radicals H, OH, and O for strain rate a=90 s−1 at different equivalence ratios: (a) Φ=1.65; (b) Φ=1.85; (c) Φ=2.20; (d) Φ=2.65.
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison between measurement and prediction for concentration profiles of ethane and predicted concentration profiles of radicals H, OH, and O for strain rate a=90 s−1 at different equivalence ratios: (a) Φ=1.65; (b) Φ=1.85; (c) Φ=2.20; (d) Φ=2.65.
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison between measurement and prediction for profiles of temperature and major species for strain rate a=90 s−1 at different equivalence ratios: (a) Φ=1.65; (b) Φ=1.85; (c) Φ=2.20; (d) Φ=2.65.
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Schematic diagram of a two-stage flame of ethane in counterflowing streams; (b) a photograph of the flame sketched above.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In