Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Controls, Diagnostics, and Instrumentation

Application of Pseudo-Poincaré Maps to Assess Gas Turbine System Health

[+] Author and Article Information
Hany Bassily

Siemens Energy, Orlando, FL 32826

Mohammed F. Daqaq

Department of Mechanical Engineering,  Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634

John Wagner1

Department of Mechanical Engineering,  Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634jwagner@clemson.edu


Corresponding author.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 134(5), 051601 (Feb 15, 2012) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4005212 History: Received February 16, 2011; Revised August 19, 2011; Published February 15, 2012; Online February 15, 2012

The transition between two operational modes in a dynamic system often occurs under strict measures such that repeatability is more a target than a metric for performance evaluations. The concept of Poincaré maps may be applied to health monitoring systems. In this paper, a diagnosis strategy based on Poincaré maps will be presented to evaluate dynamic systems’ behavior with application to power generating gas turbines based on the repeatability of the transition trajectories. Using this approach, extensive operating data for three 85 MW simple cycle power generating gas turbines were evaluated to assess and analyze their performance. The proposed strategy was capable of isolating failed starts; automatic unloads and load rejection events as major events during the test period. Results and conclusions drawn in this study regarding the health condition of the rotating equipment demonstrate the opportunity for system monitoring.

Copyright © 2012 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Location of the Poincaré Section suite with respect to the Euclidian norm of the normalized states of (a) Unit 3, (b) Unit 4, (c) Unit 5, and (d) Units 3–5

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Total deviation in (a) β and (b) η* for Unit 3 with three major events (I–III)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Total deviation in (a) β and (b) η* for Unit 4 with three major events (IV–VI)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Principle of the application of a multiple section suite to evaluate the transition trajectories behavior during both (a) fault-free, and (b) faulty conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

A Poincaré map generated using a double-sided Poincaré section (plane) which intersects a hypothetical single-period periodic orbit at the same locations

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

(a) Schematic time history of a cyclic nonperiodic system and (b) the application of state vector norm as intersection criterion for cyclic nonperiodic systems with monotonic state transition

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Demonstration of the intersection position vector angle invariance with the plane normal vector for uniform norms

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

State flow intersection point coordinates calculation and Poincaré section coordinate system for a simplified 3-dimensional case

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Gas turbine system with major inputs and output elements

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Computation algorithm for the proposed method

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Total deviation in (a) β and (b) η* for Unit 5 with abnormal events




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In