0
TECHNICAL PAPERS: Gas Turbines: Industrial and Cogeneration

A Unique Approach for Thermoeconomic Optimization of an Intercooled, Reheat, and Recuperated Gas Turbine for Cogeneration Applications

[+] Author and Article Information
R. Bhargava

Universal Ensco, Inc., 1811 Bering Drive, Houston, TX 77057

A. Peretto

DIEM—University of Bologna, Viale Risorgimento 2, Bologna 40136, Italy

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 124(4), 881-891 (Sep 24, 2002) (11 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1476928 History: Received December 01, 2000; Revised March 01, 2001; Online September 24, 2002
Copyright © 2002 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Schematic layout of the recuperated ICRH gas turbine in cogenerative application (dotted lines represent GT cooling flow streams)
Grahic Jump Location
ESIMax versus ηel for different βTOT as a function of Tin for medium size recuperated ICRH gas turbine-based cogeneration systems
Grahic Jump Location
ηel versus Pel/Qth for the four cycles considered (high size—100 MW)
Grahic Jump Location
ηel versus Pel/Qth for the four cycles considered (medium size—20 MW)
Grahic Jump Location
ηel versus Pel/Qth for the four cycles considered (low size—5 MW)
Grahic Jump Location
ESIB versus Pel/Qth for the four cycles considered (high size—100 MW)
Grahic Jump Location
ESIB versus Pel/Qth for the four cycles considered (medium size—20 MW)
Grahic Jump Location
ESIB versus Pel/Qth for the four cycles considered (low size—5 MW)
Grahic Jump Location
ESIB versus Pel for the four cycles and for the three load cases considered (Pel/Qth ratio constant for each load case and equal to the value maximizing ESIB for the Brayton cycle)
Grahic Jump Location
ηth versus Pel/Qth for the four cycles considered (medium size—20 MW)
Grahic Jump Location
Specific work versus Pel/Qth for the four cycles considered (medium size—20 MW)
Grahic Jump Location
βTOT versus ηel for the four cycles considered (low size—5 MW)
Grahic Jump Location
ms/ma versus Pel/Qth for the four cycles considered (high size—100 MW)
Grahic Jump Location
ms/ma versus Pel/Qth for the four cycles considered (medium size—20 MW)
Grahic Jump Location
ms/ma versus Pel/Qth for the four cycles considered (low size—5 MW)
Grahic Jump Location
ms versus Pel/Qth for the four cycles and for the three load cases
Grahic Jump Location
DCRR versus Pel/Qth for the four cycles considered (high size—100 MW)
Grahic Jump Location
DCRR versus Pel/Qth for the four cycles considered (medium size—20 MW)
Grahic Jump Location
DCRR versus Pel/Qth for the four cycles considered (low size—5 MW)
Grahic Jump Location
DCRR versus Pel/Qth for the four cycles considered (high size—100 MW)
Grahic Jump Location
DCRR versus Pel/Qth for the four cycles considered (medium size—20 MW)
Grahic Jump Location
DCRR versus Pel/Qth for the four cycles considered (low size—5 MW)
Grahic Jump Location
DCRR versus Pel/Qth for the four cycles considered (high size—100 MW)
Grahic Jump Location
DCRR versus Pel/Qth for the four cycles considered (low size—5 MW)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In