0
TECHNICAL PAPERS: Gas Turbines: Cycle Innovations, and Combustion and Fuels

Internal Reforming Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Gas Turbine Combined Cycles (IRSOFC-GT)—Part II: Exergy and Thermoeconomic Analyses

[+] Author and Article Information
A. F. Massardo

Thermochemical Power Group (TPG), Dip. di Macchine, Sistemi Energetici e Trasporti, Universita di Genova, Via Montallegro 1, 16145 Genova, Italy

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 125(1), 67-74 (Dec 27, 2002) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1492837 History: Received December 01, 2000; Revised March 01, 2001; Online December 27, 2002
Copyright © 2003 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Irreversibility rate (%) distribution for the FCGT3 layout
Grahic Jump Location
Irreversibility rate (%) distribution for the FCGT4 layout
Grahic Jump Location
FCGT4 layout irreversibility rate versus plant pressure and ER operative conditions
Grahic Jump Location
Second-law efficiency versus pressure ratio (FCGT3 and FCGT2)
Grahic Jump Location
Functional production diagram of the FCGT1 configuration
Grahic Jump Location
Functional productive diagram for the FCGT2 configuration
Grahic Jump Location
Functional productive diagram of the FCGT3 configuration
Grahic Jump Location
Functional productive diagram for the FCGT4 configuration
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Specific production cost versus specific power (TRAD.=traditional), (b) proposed equation for solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) specific cost evaluation
Grahic Jump Location
Cost of electricity (COE) for the FCGT1 configuration
Grahic Jump Location
Cost of electricity (COE) for the FCGT2 configuration
Grahic Jump Location
Cost of electricity (COE) for the FCGT3 configuration
Grahic Jump Location
Cost of electricity (COE) for the FCGT4 configuration
Grahic Jump Location
Cost of electricity (COE) versus system efficiency (K1=1833)
Grahic Jump Location
Cost of electricity (COE) versus system specific work (K1=1833)
Grahic Jump Location
Cost of electricity (COE) versus power ratio (cell/total, K1=1833)
Grahic Jump Location
FCGT3 layout irreversibility rate versus plant pressure and ER operative conditions
Grahic Jump Location
Second-law efficiency versus pressure ratio (FCGT1 and FCGT2 plant)
Grahic Jump Location
FCGT2 layout irreversibility rates versus plant pressure and ER operative conditions
Grahic Jump Location
FCGT1 layout irreversibility rates versus plant pressure and ER operative conditions
Grahic Jump Location
Irreversibility rate distribution (%) for the FCGT2 layout
Grahic Jump Location
Irreversibility rate distribution (%) for the FCGT1 layout

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In