Calculation of Surface Roughness Effects on Air-Riding Seals

[+] Author and Article Information
C. Guardino, J. W. Chew

Fluids Research Center, School of Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, UK

N. J. Hills

Thermo-Fluid Mechanics Research Centre, School of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QT, UK

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 126(1), 75-82 (Mar 02, 2004) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1619426 History: Received December 01, 2001; Revised March 01, 2002; Online March 02, 2004
Copyright © 2004 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Munson, J., 1992, “Development of a High Performance Compressor Discharge Seal,” 28th Joint Propulsion Conference, AIAA Paper 92-3714.
Hwang,  M. F., Pope,  A., and Shucktis,  B., 1995, “Advanced Seals for Engine Secondary Flow Path,” J. Propul. Power, 12, pp. 794–799.
Acheson, D. J., 1990, Elementary Fluid Dynamics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Anderson, J. D., 1989, Hypersonic and High Temperature Gas Dynamics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Dyson, A., 1978, “Hydrodynamic Lubrication of Rough Surfaces—A Review of Theoretical Work,” Surface Roughness Effects in Lubrication, D. Dowson, C. M. Taylor, M. Godet, and D. Berthe, eds., Mech. Eng. Publications Ltd. London, pp. 61–70.
Lunde,  L., and Tonder,  K., 1997, “Pressure and Shear Flow in a Rough Hydrodynamic Bearing, Flow Factor Calculation,” ASME J. Tribol., 119, pp. 549–555.
Szeri, A. Z., ed., 1980, Tribology: Friction, Lubrication and Wear, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Faria,  M. T. C., and Andres,  L. S., 2000, “On the Numerical Modelling of High-Speed Hydrodynamic Gas Bearings,” ASME J. Tribol., 122, pp. 124–130.
Massey, B. S., 1983, Mechanics of Fluids, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Fluent Inc., 1998, http:www.fluent.com.
Tannehill, J. C., Anderson, D. A., and Pletcher, P. H., 1997, Computational Fluid Mechanics & Heat Transfer, 2nd Ed., Taylor & Francis, London.
Burden, R. L., and Faires, J. D., 1993, Numerical Analysis, PWS-Kent Publishing, Boston.


Grahic Jump Location
Solutions for a moderate compressible smooth and rough Rayleigh-pad (smooth case: Λ=4.68 and Re=29.7, rough case: τ=0.2, Λ=5.06, Re=27.5)
Grahic Jump Location
Load-carrying capacities for various two-dimensional roughness parameters τ (ξ/τ=2, incompressible case)
Grahic Jump Location
Schematic of a periodic Rayleigh-pad with two-dimensional harmonic surface roughness (not to scale)
Grahic Jump Location
Streamlines in the vicinity of the step
Grahic Jump Location
Streamlines for two-dimensional flow near the step for τ=0.8 and Re=340
Grahic Jump Location
Nondimensional pressures κ for Re=340 and roughness parameters τ=0.2 and 0.8 (incompressible case)
Grahic Jump Location
Nondimensional load-carrying capacity for various Reynolds numbers (incompressible case)
Grahic Jump Location
Closeup of mesh for full three-dimensional Rayleigh-pad simulation
Grahic Jump Location
Surface gauge pressure contours for a Rayleigh-step with three-dimensional harmonic surface corrugations for the case τ=0.8, Re=125
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of moving surface pressure distributions for both two-dimensional and three-dimensional roughness for τ=0.8 and Re=125
Grahic Jump Location
Typical tetrahedral mesh for a unit corrugation three-dimensional wavy surface (τ=0.8, Re=125)
Grahic Jump Location
Typical velocity vector plot for a unit corrugation three-dimensional wavy surface (τ=0.8, Re=125)
Grahic Jump Location
Load-carrying capacities for various roughness parameters τ (ξ /τ=5, incompressible case)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In