0
TECHNICAL PAPERS: Advanced Energy Systems

A Simulation Model for Hot Spring Thermal Energy Conversion Plant With Working Fluid of Binary Mixtures

[+] Author and Article Information
Ou Bai

Department of Advanced Systems Control Engineering, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saga University, Honjomachi 1, Saga 840-8502, Japan Institute of Ocean Energy, Saga University, Honjomachi 1, Saga 840-8502, Japan 

Masatoshi Nakamura

Department of Advanced Systems Control Engineering, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saga University, Honjomachi 1, Saga 840-8502, Japan  

Yasuyuki Ikegami, Haruo Uehara

Institute of Ocean Energy, Saga University, Honjomachi 1, Saga 840-8502, Japan

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 126(3), 445-454 (Aug 11, 2004) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1760526 History: Received March 01, 2002; Revised September 01, 2003; Online August 11, 2004
Copyright © 2004 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Diagram of power cycle of the pilot STEC plant. The thick, middle, and thin solid lines stands for the high, middle, and low pressure parts in the power cycle, respectively.
Grahic Jump Location
Model structure of evaporator and separator
Grahic Jump Location
Model structure of condenser and tank 1
Grahic Jump Location
Model structure of heater and tank 2
Grahic Jump Location
Model structure of absorber
Grahic Jump Location
Model structure of regenerator
Grahic Jump Location
Model structure of turbine
Grahic Jump Location
Model structure of diffuser
Grahic Jump Location
Model simulation and evaluation under changeable spring water temperature. The experimental data depicted by the dotted lines were acquired from a pilot STEC plant. The consistence between the simulation results and the experimental data demonstrates that the developed models can represent the real STEC plant sufficiently.
Grahic Jump Location
Model simulation of step response of spring water temperature. The power rate GTB increased slightly in about 100 s, then, dropped to 3.8 kW. The reason is that the burden of the condenser also increases and cannot cool the vapor sufficiently so that the pressure at the outlet of turbine (e.g., the pressure in condenser) increases. The illustrated characteristics are useful for developing an appropriate plant controller to achieve a stable plant operation.
Grahic Jump Location
Model simulation of step response of mass flow rate of spring water. The power rate GTB decreased slightly in about 100 s, then, increased to 4.2 kW. From this simulation, an appropriate gain can be selected in order to develop an appropriate controller for achieving a stable power generation from turbine under the temperature change of spring water.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In