0
TECHNICAL PAPERS: Gas Turbines: Cycle Innovations

An Evaluation of the Effects of Water Injection on Compressor Performance

[+] Author and Article Information
A. J. White, A. J. Meacock

Hopkinson Laboratory, Cambridge University Engineering Department, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 126(4), 748-754 (Nov 24, 2004) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1765125 History: Received October 01, 2002; Revised March 01, 2003; Online November 24, 2004
Copyright © 2004 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of ideal wet and dry compression. p1=1 bar,T1=288 K,RH=100%. (Note: work is per kg of compressor delivery air.)
Grahic Jump Location
Work input per unit flow and evaporation rate for a polytropic compression with ηp=90% and p2/p1=15. Curve (i): ṗτ=0.8, curve (ii): ṗτ=20.
Grahic Jump Location
Entropy increase, ΔS/Ra, for the compression of Fig. 2
Grahic Jump Location
Compressor characteristics for different water injection rates (Inlet conditions: To=288 K,Po=1.0 bar,RH=100%, injected droplets are of 5 μm diameter and at 288 K)
Grahic Jump Location
Aerodynamic efficiency curves corresponding to Fig. 4
Grahic Jump Location
Stage flow coefficients relative to their design value (ϕ/ϕ*) for the compressor of Fig. 4. Each curve is plotted at the new operating point—i.e., the open circles of Fig. 4.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In