0
TECHNICAL PAPERS: Gas Turbines: Combustion and Fuel

Surface-Stabilized Fuel Injectors With Sub-Three PPM NOx Emissions for a 5.5 MW Gas Turbine Engine

[+] Author and Article Information
Steven J. Greenberg, Neil K. McDougald, Christopher K. Weakley, Robert M. Kendall

ALZETA Corporation, 2343 Calle del Mundo, Santa Clara, CA 95054

Leonel O. Arellano

Solar Turbines, 2200 Pacific Highway, San Diego, CA 92186

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 127(2), 276-285 (Apr 15, 2005) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1839920 History: Received October 01, 2002; Revised March 01, 2003; Online April 15, 2005
Copyright © 2005 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Vandervort,  C. L., 2001, “9 ppm NOx/CO Combustion System for “F” Class Industrial Gas Turbines,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 123, pp. 317–321.
Yee,  D. K., Lundberg,  K., and Weakley,  C. K., 2001, “Field Demonstration of a 1.5 MW Industrial Gas Turbine With a Low Emissions Catalytica Combus-tion System,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 123, pp. 550–556.
Leonard, G. L., and Correa, S. M., 1990, “NOx Formation in Premixed High-Pressure Lean Methane Flames,” Fossil Fuel Combustion Symposium 1990, S. N. Singh, ed., American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, pp. 69–74.
Weakley, C. K., Greenberg, S. J., Kendall, R. M., McDougald, N. K., and Arellano, L. O., 2002, “Development of Surface-Stabilized Fuel Injectors With Sub-Three ppm NOx Emissions,” ASME Paper No. IJPGC2002-26088, presented at the 2002 International Joint Power Generation Conference, Phoenix, AZ, 24–26 June, 2002.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Surface-stabilized combustion
Grahic Jump Location
Surface-stabilized nanoSTAR injector
Grahic Jump Location
Surface-stabilized compared to aerodynamically stabilized emission results; both tests conducted at 1.01 MPa (10 atm) pressure and 535–590 K (500–600°F) inlet temperatures
Grahic Jump Location
Gas producer speed and NOx emissions from Saturn test run
Grahic Jump Location
NanoSTAR injector during atmospheric testing
Grahic Jump Location
Emissions versus calculated adiabatic flame temperature
Grahic Jump Location
Solid model of sector rig liner with two nanoSTAR injectors installed
Grahic Jump Location
Injector separations on successive days of testing
Grahic Jump Location
CO emissions during one fired/one unfired tests
Grahic Jump Location
NOx emissions for both injectors fired
Grahic Jump Location
CO emissions for both injectors fired
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of day 6 NOx data with data from a single injector test on Dec. 7, 2001
Grahic Jump Location
Pictures of the first sector rig injector before testing (left) and after testing
Grahic Jump Location
NOx and CO emissions at 116 MPa (16 atm) versus AFT

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In