0
TECHNICAL PAPERS: Gas Turbines: Structures and Dynamics

Life Prediction for Complex Structures

[+] Author and Article Information
S. C. Forth

United Technologies Research Center, NASA Langley Research Center, MS 188E, Two West Reid Street, Hampton, VA 23682

B. S. Annigeri

United Technologies Research Center, MS 129-73, 411 Silver Lane, East Hartford, CT 06108

W. D. Keat

Mechanical Engineering Department, Union College, Steinmetz Hall, Schenectady, NY 12308

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 127(4), 814-819 (Sep 20, 2005) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1448330 History: Received November 01, 1999; Revised February 01, 2000; Online September 20, 2005
Copyright © 2005 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Cisilino,  A. P., and Aliabadi,  M. H., 1997, “Three-Dimensional BEM Analysis for Fatigue Crack Growth in Welded Components,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping 70, pp. 135–144.
Guanshui,  X., Argon,  A. S., Ortiz,  M., and Bower,  A., 1995, “Development of a Variational Boundary Integral Method for Analysis of Fully Three-Dimensional Crack Advance Problems,” Comp. Mech., 2, pp. 2874–2889.
Forth,  S. C., and Keat,  W. D., 1997, “Nonplanar Crack Growth Using the Surface Integral Method,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 119, pp. 964–968.
Elber, W., 1971, “The Significance of Fatigue Crack Closure,” Damage tolerance of aircraft structures, ASTM-STP-486, ASTM, Philadelphia, pp. 230–242.
Newman, J. C., Jr., 1982, “Prediction of Fatigue Crack Growth Under Variable-Amplitude and Spectrum Loading Using a Closure Model,” Design of Fatigue and Fracture Resistant Structures, ASTM-STP-761, ASTM, Philadelphia.
Newman, J. C., Jr., 1984.
Newman, J. C., Jr., and Raju, I. S., 1984, “Prediction of Fatigue Crack Growth Patterns and Lives in Three-Dimensional Cracked Bodies,” NASA TM-85787.
Dugdale,  D. S., 1960, “Yielding of Steel Sheets Containing Slits,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 8, No. 2, pp. 100–104.
Irwin, G. R., 1960, “Plastic Zone Near a Crack and Fracture Toughness,” Proceedings of the 7th Sagamore Conference.
Newman, J. C., Jr., 1981, “A Crack Closure Model for Predicting Fatigue Crack Growth Under Aircraft Spectrum Loading,” Methods and Models for Predicting Fatigue Crack Growth Under Random Loading, ASTM-STP-748, ASTM, Philadelphia, pp. 53–84.
Forth,  S. C., and Keat,  W. D., 1996, “Three-Dimensional Nonplanar Fracture Model Using the Surface Integral Method,” Int. J. Fract., 77, No. 3, pp. 243–262.
Love, A. E. H., 1944, A Treatise on Mathematical Theory of Elasticity, Dover, New York.
Keat,  W. D., Erguven,  M. E., and Dwyer,  J. F., 1997, “Modeling of Three-Dimensional Mixed-Mode Fractures Near Planar Bimaterial Interfaces Using Surface Integrals,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 39, pp. 3679–3703.
Rongved, 1955, “Force at a Point in the Interior of a Semi-Infinite Solid,” Proc. 2nd Midwestern Conf. On Solid Mech., pp. 1–13.
Pearson, C. E., 1983, Handbook of Applied Mathematics, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Erdogan,  F., and Sih,  G. H., 1963, “On the Crack Extension in Plates Under Plane Loading and Transverse Shear,” ASME J. Basic Eng., 85, pp. 519–527.
Forman, R. G., and Mettu, S. R., 1992, “Behavior of Surface and Corner Cracks Subjected to Tensile and Bending Loads in Ti-6Al-4V Alloy,” ASTM-STP-1131, ASTM, Philadelphia, pp. 519–546.
Erdogan,  F., 1983, “Stress Intensity Factors,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 50, pp. 992–1002.
deJonge, J. B., Schutz, D., Lowak, H., and Schijve, J., 1973, “A Standardized Load Sequence for Flight Simulation Tests on Transport Aircraft Wing Structures (TWIST),” National Lucht-en Ruimtevaartlaboratium, NLR-TR 73029U.
Tada,  H., 1971, “A Note on the Finite Width Corrections to the Stress Intensity Factor,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 3, No. 3, pp. 345–347.
Keat, W. D., et al., 1996.
Keat and Forth, 1997.
Forth, S. C., Favrow, L. H., and Keat, W. D., 1999, “Mixed-Mode Crack Growth: An Experimental and Computational Study,” Fatigue ’99 Conf. Proc., Vol. 4, pp. 2533–2538.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Advancement of the fracture surface
Grahic Jump Location
Mode I stress intensity factor versus crack length for a through crack in a thick plate (W/t=8.0)
Grahic Jump Location
Curved surface crack (geometry I)
Grahic Jump Location
Curved surface crack (geometry II)
Grahic Jump Location
Effect of changes in curvature on stress intensity factors for geometry I
Grahic Jump Location
Effect of changes in curvature on stress intensity factors for geometry II
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of surface integral model results to experimental data for 60 deg angled surface crack subject to cyclic tension loading. Graph (above) shows number of cycles plotted against crack half-length, c, at the free surface where c is measured perpendicular to the direction of the load. Photograph (above right) of precrack with growth rings is consistent with resulting crack mesh (below right).
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of surface integral model results to field data for a part undergoing spectrum loading. Graph above shows number of spectrum hours versus crack depth. Photograph (above right) of growth rings corresponds to cross section indicated on part insert. Succession of crack fronts predicted by the model is also shown (below right).

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In