TECHNICAL PAPERS: Gas Turbines: Manufacturing, Materials & Metallurgy

Properties, Weldability, and Applications of Modern Wrought Heat-Resistant Alloys for Aerospace and Power Generation Industries

[+] Author and Article Information
M. D. Rowe, V. R. Ishwar, D. L. Klarstrom

 Haynes International, Inc., 1020 W. Park Avenue, Kokomo, IN 46904-9013

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 128(2), 354-361 (Mar 01, 2004) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2056527 History: Received October 01, 2003; Revised March 01, 2004

Alloy selection and alloy design both require consideration of an array of material attributes, including in-service properties, weldability, and fabricability. Critical properties of modern heat-resistant alloys for gas turbine applications include high-temperature strength, thermal stability, oxidation resistance, and fatigue resistance. In this paper, the properties of 12 solid-solution-strengthened and six age-hardenable heat-resistant alloys are compared. Weldability is an important attribute and can be a major limiting factor in the use of certain alloys. Weldability test methods are discussed, and the resistance of alloys to solidification cracking and strain-age cracking is compared. The use of weldability testing in the development of modern heat-resistant alloys is discussed with several examples cited. Finally, alloy selection for gas turbine components is outlined, taking into account both alloy properties and fabricability.

Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Stress rupture properties of solid-solution-strengthened (bottom) and age-hardenable (top) alloys. Alloy 625 is included in both plots for reference.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Thermal stability of solid-solution-strengthened alloys (room temperature tensile elongation after aging for 1000 hr at various temperatures)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Comparison of low-cycle fatigue behavior at 427 °C for annealed material versus material aged at 760 °C for 1000 hr. (Total strain range of 1.0%, R=−1.0,F=0.33HZ).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Strain-age cracking of a simulated repair weld in R-41 alloy

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Correlation between restrained circular patch test results and controlled heating rate test (CHRT) minimum elongation (8)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Ranking of the susceptibility of commercial alloys to strain-age cracking by the controlled heating rate test (CHRT)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Ranking of the susceptibility of commercial alloys to solidification cracking by the varestraint test

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Influence of boron content on solidification cracking resistance of 230 alloy, as indicated by the varestraint test

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Effect of boron and zirconium additions on the strain-age cracking resistance of 214 alloy, as measured by the controlled heating rate test



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In