0
TECHNICAL PAPERS: Gas Turbines: CFD Modeling and Simulation

Rayleigh-Bénard Convection in Open and Closed Rotating Cavities

[+] Author and Article Information
Martin P. King

 Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Strada Costiera 11, Trieste, Italy

Michael Wilson

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK

J. Michael Owen

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UKensjmo@bath.ac.uk

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 129(2), 305-311 (Nov 15, 2005) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2432898 History: Received October 31, 2005; Revised November 15, 2005

Buoyancy effects can be significant in the rotating annular cavities found between compressor discs in gas-turbine engines, where Rayleigh numbers above 1012 are common. In some engines, the cavity is “closed” so that the air is confined between four rotating surfaces: two discs and inner and outer cylinders. In most engines, however, the cavity is “open” and there is an axial throughflow of cooling air at the center. For open rotating cavities, a review of the published evidence suggests a Rayleigh–Bénard type of flow structure, in which, at the larger radii, there are pairs of cyclonic and anti-cyclonic vortices. The toroidal circulation created by the axial throughflow is usually restricted to the smaller radii in the cavity. For a closed rotating annulus, solution of the unsteady Navier–Stokes equations, for Rayleigh numbers up to 109, show Rayleigh–Bénard convection similar to that found in stationary enclosures. The computed streamlines in the r-θ plane show pairs of cyclonic and anti-cyclonic vortices; but, at the larger Rayleigh numbers, the computed isotherms suggest that the flow in the annulus is thermally mixed. At the higher Rayleigh numbers, the computed instantaneous Nusselt numbers are unsteady and tend to oscillate with time. The computed time-averaged Nusselt numbers are in good agreement with the correlations for Rayleigh–Bénard convection in a stationary enclosure, but they are significantly higher than the published empirical correlations for a closed rotating annulus.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Simplified diagram of high-pressure compressor rotor with axial throughflow

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Schematic diagram of open and closed rotating cavities

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Rayleigh–Bénard convection in a horizontal stationary enclosure

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

2D computations of variation of Nu3,av with t¯ for a∕b=0.5

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Computed 2D streamlines and isotherms for a∕b=0.5

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Computed 3D flow structure at z¯=0.25 and for Ra3=103.9, a∕b=0.5, G=0.5

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

2D computations of variation of Nu¯3,av with Ra3 for a∕b=0.5

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In