TECHNICAL PAPERS: Gas Turbines: Structures and Dynamics

Convergent Zone-Refinement Method for Risk Assessment of Gas Turbine Disks Subject to Low-Frequency Metallurgical Defects

[+] Author and Article Information
Harry R. Millwater

Department of Mechanical Engineering,  The University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX, 78249harry.millwater@utsa.edu

Michael P. Enright

Reliability and Material Integrity, Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Rd., San Antonio, TX, 78228menright@swri.org

Simeon H. K. Fitch

 Mustard Seed Software, 1634 Brandywine Drive, Charlottesville, VA, 22901simeon.fitch@mseedsoft.com

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 129(3), 827-835 (Sep 15, 2006) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2431393 History: Received March 08, 2005; Revised September 15, 2006

Titanium gas turbine disks are subject to a rare but not insignificant probability of fracture due to metallurgical defects, particularly hard α. A probabilistic methodology has been developed and implemented in concordance with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Advisory Circular 33.14-1 to compute the probability of fracture of gas turbine titanium disks subject to low-frequency metallurgical (hard α) defects. This methodology is further developed here to ensure that a robust, converged, accurate calculation of the probability is computed that is independent of discretization issues. A zone-based material discretization methodology is implemented, then refined locally through further discretization using risk contribution factors as a metric. The technical approach is akin to “h” refinement in finite element analysis; that is, a local metric is used to indicate regions requiring further refinement, and subsequent refinement yields a more accurate solution. Supporting technology improvements are also discussed, including localized finite element refinement and onion skinning for zone subdivision resolution, and a restart database and parallel processing for computational efficiency. A numerical example is presented for demonstration.

Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Fracture mechanics model using a rectangular plate overlaid on an axisymmetric finite element model

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Univariant stress gradient

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Selection of zones for refinement using risk contribution factors; red (gray) zones indicate RCF greater than 5%

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Schematic of zone subdivision: parent zone (left) divided into four subzones (right) about stress centroid of parent

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Example of finite element subdivision in support of zone refinement

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Example of onion-skinning algorithm applied to a single finite element

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Iteration results showing the convergence in risk versus the number of zones (old and new)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

(a)–(d) Sequence of zone refinement iterations for impeller rotor disk model and (e)–(h) sequence of zone refinement iterations for impeller rotor disk model

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Three-dimensional idealized impeller finite element model



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In