0
TECHNICAL PAPERS: Internal Combustion Engines

Friction Reduction by Piston Ring Pack Modifications of a Lean-Burn Four-Stroke Natural Gas Engine: Experimental Results

[+] Author and Article Information
Kris Quillen, Rudolf H. Stanglmaier

Engines and Energy Conversion Laboratory, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO 80524

Luke Moughon, Rosalind Takata, Victor Wong

Sloan Automotive Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139

Ed Reinbold, Rick Donahue

 Waukesha Engine Dresser, Waukesha, WI 53188

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 129(4), 1088-1094 (Jan 11, 2007) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2719262 History: Received July 13, 2006; Revised January 11, 2007

A project to reduce frictional losses from natural gas engines is currently being carried out by a collaborative team from Waukesha Engine Dresser, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), and Colorado State University (CSU). This project is part of the Advanced Reciprocating Engine System (ARES) program led by the U.S. Department of Energy. Previous papers have discussed the computational tools used to evaluate piston-ring/cylinder friction and described the effects of changing various ring pack parameters on engine friction. These computational tools were used to optimize the ring pack of a Waukesha VGF 18-liter engine, and this paper presents the experimental results obtained on the engine test bed. Measured reductions in friction mean effective pressure (FMEP) were observed with a low tension oil control ring (LTOCR) and a skewed barrel top ring (SBTR). A negative twist second ring (NTSR) was used to counteract the oil consumption increase due to the LTOCR. The LTOCR and SBTR each resulted in a 0.50% improvement in mechanical efficiency (ηmech).

Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Typical piston ring pack

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Illustration of skewed barrel profile design

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Cylinder 5 pressure transducer measurements

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Cylinder 5 pressure transducer locations

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Optical encoder and optical pickup

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Eddy current dynamometer

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

AVL automatic oil consumption meter

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Output from the oil consumption meter (LTOCR & NTSR at 1800rpm and 400bhp(298kW))

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Blow-by flow meter

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

COV of IMEP of cylinder 6 and the cylinder average

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Assembled test engine

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Disassembled test engine

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

FMEP versus BMEP at 1800rpm (combined baseline results)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

FMEP vs. BMEP at 1800rpm (separate baseline results)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 16

Experimental and modeled FMEP results at 1800rpm and 400bhp(298kW)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 17

ηmech versus BMEP at 1800rpm

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 18

ηmech versus BMEP at 1800rpm

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 19

Measured oil consumption at 1800rpm and 400bhp(298kW)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 20

Blow-by flow versus BMEP at 1800rpm

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In