0
TECHNICAL PAPERS: Power Engineering

# Natural Gas Decarbonization Technologies for Advanced Power Plants

[+] Author and Article Information
Marco Gambini

Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Rome “Tor Vergata,” Via del Politecnico no. 1, 00133 Rome, Italygambini@ing.uniroma2.it

Michela Vellini

Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Rome “Tor Vergata,” Via del Politecnico no. 1, 00133 Rome, Italyvellini@ing.uniroma2.it

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 129(4), 1114-1124 (Jan 24, 2007) (11 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2719266 History: Received October 13, 2006; Revised January 24, 2007

## Abstract

In this paper two options for $H2$ production, by means of natural gas, are presented and their performances are evaluated when they are integrated with advanced $H2$/air cycles. In this investigation two different schemes have been analyzed: an advanced combined cycle power plant (CC) and a new advanced mixed cycle power plant (AMC). The two methods for producing $H2$ are as follows: (1) steam methane reforming: it is the simplest and potentially the most economic method for producing hydrogen in the foreseeable future; and (2) partial oxidation of methane: it could offer an energy advantage because this method reduces the energy requirement of the reforming process. These hydrogen production plants require material and energetic integrations with power section and the best interconnections must be investigated in order to obtain good overall performance. With reference to thermodynamic and economic performance, significant comparisons have been made between the above introduced reference plants. An efficiency decrease and an increase in the cost of electricity has been obtained when power plants are equipped with a natural gas decarbonization section. The main results of the performed investigation are quite variable among the different $H2$ production technologies here considered: the efficiency decreases in a range of 5.5 percentage points to nearly 10 for the partial oxidation of the natural gas and in a range of about 9 percentage points to over 12 for the steam methane reforming. The electricity production cost increases in a range of about 41–42% for the first option and in a range of about 34–38% for the second one. The AMC, coupled with partial oxidation, stands out among the other power plant solutions here analyzed because it exhibits the highest net efficiency and the lowest final specific $CO2$ emission. In addition to this, economic impact is favorable when AMC is equipped with systems for $H2$ production based on partial oxidation of natural gas.

<>

## Figures

Figure 1

CC power plant

Figure 2

AMC power plant

Figure 3

Steam methane reforming process

Figure 4

Separation process of CO2 by chemical absorption

Figure 5

CO2 liquefaction process

Figure 6

Methane partial oxidation process

Figure 7

CC power plant integrated with H2 production plant (steam methane reforming)

Figure 8

AMC power plant integrated with H2 production plant (steam methane reforming)

Figure 9

Heat exchanger network (CC)

Figure 10

Heat exchanger network (AMC)

Figure 11

Heat and mass balances (CC)

Figure 12

Heat and mass balances (AMC)

Figure 13

The overall efficiency

Figure 14

The CO2 specific emission rate

Figure 15

Electricity production costs

Figure 16

The electricity production cost increase

## Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

### Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related Proceedings Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections