Research Papers: Power Engineering

Estimating HP-IP Midspan Packing Leakage in Combined Cycles

[+] Author and Article Information
Tsatsu Fiadjoe

 GE Energy, Schenectady, NY 12306

Published by Cotton (2) in “Evaluating and Improving Steam Turbine Performance.”

Source: GE Technical Information Series (3).

Maximum temperature spreads are subject to the turbine manufacturer’s specifications.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 130(2), 023007 (Mar 05, 2008) (4 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2772631 History: Received October 16, 2006; Revised December 06, 2006; Published March 05, 2008

When a turbine has combined high-pressure (HP) and intermediate-pressure (IP) sections, there is a steam flow path between the sections. In combined cycle steam turbines, this internal leakage flow rate needs to be determined for the steam turbine performance calculations. However, since the leakage is internal to the turbine, it cannot be measured directly. One method, which has been employed in determining the midpacking leakage flow rate, is the variation of initial and̸or reheat temperature method. It involves using the convergence of IP efficiency plots from multiple test runs to estimate the HP-IP leakage flow rate. Although this method has been employed successfully in large steam applications, it has generally not produced consistent results for combined cycle steam turbines. The lack of convergence for combined cycles may be due to the fact that some of the assumptions made in applying the method to large steam applications are not valid for combined cycle applications. Some of the assumptions, which need to be reviewed and modified for combined cycle application, are as follows: (a) constant IP efficiency for all test runs, (b) constant throttle flow during all test runs, (c) constant section pressure ratios for all test runs, and (d) no influence of external cooling or admission flows. This paper reviews the modifications to the traditional initial and/or reheat temperature variation method to make the midpacking leakage calculations more consistent for combined cycle applications. Some data have shown that incorporating these additional changes improves the convergence of midpacking leakage determination.

Copyright © 2008 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Normalized IP efficiency versus normalized group velocity ratio

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Typical instrumentation diagram of a combined cycle steam turbine

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

HP-IP leakage using traditional fossil analysis method

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

HP-IP leakage test using combined analysis method




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In