0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Ceramics

Foreign Object Damage in an Oxide/Oxide Composite at Ambient Temperature

[+] Author and Article Information
Sung R. Choi1

 Naval Air Systems Command, Patuxent River, MD 20670sung.choi1@navy.mil

Donald J. Alexander, Robert W. Kowalik

 Naval Air Systems Command, Patuxent River, MD 20670

1

Corresponding author.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 131(2), 021301 (Dec 24, 2008) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2969091 History: Received April 09, 2008; Revised April 10, 2008; Published December 24, 2008

Foreign object damage behavior of an oxide/oxide (N720/AS) ceramic matrix composite was determined at ambient temperature using impact velocities ranging from 100 m/s to 400 m/s by 1.59 mm diameter steel-ball projectiles. Two different support configurations of target specimens were used: fully supported and partially supported. The degree of post-impact strength degradation increased with increasing impact velocity and was greater in a partially supported configuration than in a fully supported one. For the fully supported configuration, frontal contact stress played a major role in generating composite damage, while for the partially supported case, both frontal contact and backside flexure stresses were the combined sources of damage generation. The oxide/oxide composite was able to survive high energy (1.3J) impacts without complete structural failure. The degree of relative post-impact strength degradation of the oxide/oxide composite was similar to that of an advanced SiC/SiC composite observed from a previous study, regardless of the type of specimen support. Like the SiC/SiC composite, impact-damage tolerance was greater in the oxide/oxide than in monolithic silicon nitride ceramics for impact velocities >300m/s.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

SEM micrographs of oxide/oxide (N720/AS) ceramic matrix composite used in this work

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Impact testing apparatus (15)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

(a) Two types of target-specimen support used in FOD testing: (i) fully supported and (ii) partially supported (L=20 mm); (b) four-point flexure configuration used in post-impact strength testing with a LVDT placed

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Post-impact flexural strength as a function of impact velocity, determined for oxide/oxide composite impacted by 1.59-mm-diameter steel-ball projectiles with two different types of specimen support. As-R represents as-received strength with no impact.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

(a) Comparison of post-impact flexural strength as a function of impact velocity between the oxide/oxide (this study) and the MI SiC/SiC composites (21), impacted by 1.59-mm-diameter steel-ball projectiles with two different types of specimen support. (b) Comparison in normalized post-impact strength between the two composites.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

1.59-mm-diameter steel-ball projectiles after impact on (a) oxide/oxide at 400 m/s (in full support), (b) oxide/oxide at 400 m/s (in partial support), and (c) AS800 silicon nitride at 350 m/s (in full support) (15)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Frontal impact-damage size as a function of impact velocity for the oxide/oxide composite in fully and partially supported configurations. The data on the MI SiC/SiC composite (21) were included for comparison.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Typical examples of damage showing impact sites and sides of specimens at 350 m/s: (a) fully supported specimen; (b) partially supported specimen. The arrows indicate the impact sites.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Progression of impact damage with velocity in (a) fully supported and (b) partially supported specimens. The vertical arrow indicates a case of increasing impact velocity.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Cross-sectional views of impact sites showing occurrence of cone cracking in (a) oxide/oxide (400 m/s), (b) SiC/SiC (400 m/s), (c) AS800 silicon nitride at 400 m/s (18), and (d) a cone separated from (c). The arrows indicate the impact sites.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Load-deflection curves determined in flexure for both fully and partially supported specimens impacted from 0 m/s to 400 m/s. The curves with zero velocity indicate the as-received specimen with no impact.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Comparison of normalized post-impact strength as a function of impact kinetic energy among the oxide/oxide, the MI SiC/SiC (21), and AS800 and SN282 silicon nitrides (16), impacted by 1.59-mm-diameter steel projectiles in a fully supported configuration

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In