Research Papers: Nuclear Power

Integration of Nuclear Energy Into Oil Sands Projects

[+] Author and Article Information
Ashley E. Finan, Andrew C. Kadak

 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 132(4), 042902 (Jan 22, 2010) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.3098421 History: Received November 11, 2008; Revised November 22, 2008; Published January 22, 2010; Online January 22, 2010

Energy security and greenhouse gas reduction are thought to be two of the most urgent priorities for sustaining and improving the human condition in the near future. Few places pit the two goals so directly in opposition to one another as the Alberta oil sands. Here, Canadian natural gas is burned in massive quantities to extract oil from one of North America’s largest native sources of carbon-intensive heavy oil. However, this conflict need not continue. Nonemitting nuclear energy can replace natural gas as a fuel source in an economical and more environmentally sound way. This would allow for the continued extraction of transportation fuels without greenhouse gas emissions, while freeing up the natural gas supply for hydrogen feedstock and other valuable applications. Bitumen production in Alberta expanded dramatically in the past 5 years as the price of oil rose to record levels. This paper explores the feasibility and economics of using nuclear energy to power future oil sands production and upgrading activities, and puts forth several nuclear energy application scenarios for providing steam and electricity to in situ and surface mining operations. This review includes the Enhanced CANDU 6, the Advanced CANDU Reactor, and the pebble bed modular reactor. Based on reasonable projections of available cost information, steam produced using nuclear energy is expected to be less expensive than steam produced by natural gas at current natural gas prices and at prices above $6.50/MMBtu (CAD). For electricity production, nuclear energy becomes competitive with natural gas plants at gas prices of $10–13/MMBtu (CAD). Costs of constructing nuclear plants in Alberta are affected by higher local labor costs, which this paper took into account in making these estimates. Although a more definitive analysis of construction costs and project economics will be required to confirm these findings, there appears to be sufficient merit in the potential economics to support further study.

Copyright © 2010 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Pebble bed steam supply flowchart used in analysis

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Levelized cost of electricity comparison

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Levelized cost of electricity with varying nuclear capital costs at $5/MMBtu natural gas

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Cost of steam production from a natural gas fired boiler

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Levelized cost per barrel of steam

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Levelized cost of steam production with varying nuclear capital costs ($5 NG)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Emissions reductions in replacement of natural gas with nuclear energy

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Present value of emissions reductions due to replacement of natural gas with nuclear energy

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Levelized cost of steam with carbon pricing




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In