Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Coal, Biomass, and Alternative Fuels

Rotordynamic Stability Predictions for Centrifugal Compressors Using a Bulk-Flow Model to Predict Impeller Shroud Force and Moment Coefficients

[+] Author and Article Information
Manoj K. Gupta

 Dresser-Rand Company, Paul Clark Dr., Olean, NY 14760manoj̱ḵgupta@dresser-rand.com

Dara W. Childs

Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TXdchilds@mengr.tamu.edu

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 132(9), 091402 (Jun 17, 2010) (14 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2720519 History: Received June 12, 2006; Revised January 04, 2007; Published June 17, 2010; Online June 17, 2010

An analysis is developed for a compressible bulk-flow model of the leakage path between a centrifugal-compressor impeller’s shroud and its housing along the impeller’s front and back sides. This development is an extension of analyses performed first by Childs (1989, ASME J. Vib. Acoust., Stress, Reliab. Des., 111, pp. 216–225) for pump impellers. The bulk-flow model is used to predict reaction force and moment coefficients for the impeller shroud. A labyrinth seal code developed by Childs and Scharrer ( 1986, ASME Trans. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 108, pp. 325–331) is used to calculate the rotordynamic coefficients developed by the labyrinth seals in the compressor stage and also provides a boundary condition for the shroud calculations. Comparisons between the measured shroud moment coefficients by Yoshida (1996, Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Rotating Machinery, 2, pp. 151–160) and model predictions show reasonable agreements for the clearance flow and reaction moments. For the conditions considered, low Mach number flow existed in the shroud clearance areas and compressible-flow and incompressible-flow models produced similar predictions. Childs’ model predictions for the direct damping and cross-coupled stiffness coefficients of a pump impeller produced reasonable agreement; hence the present model was validated to the extent possible. A rotor model consisting of an overhung impeller stage supported by a nominally cantilevered rotor was analyzed for stability using the present bulk-flow model and an API standard Wachel–von Nimitz formula model (1981, J. Petrol. Technol., pp. 2252–2260). The bulk-flow model predicted significantly higher onset speeds of instability. Given that some compressors have been predicted to be comfortably stable using API standard Wachel–von Nimitz formula but have been unstable on the test stand, these results suggest that unidentified destabilizing forces and or moments are present in compressors. Seal rub conditions that arise from surge events and increase the seal clearances are simulated, showing that enlarged clearances increase the preswirl at the seals, thus increasing these seal’s destabilizing forces and reducing stability margins. These results are consistent with field experience. Predictions concerning the back shroud indicate that shunt-hole injection mainly acts to enhance stability by changing the flow field of the division wall or balance piston seals, not by influencing the back-shroud’s forces or moments. Effective swirl brakes at these seals also serve this purpose.

Copyright © 2010 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Schematic of the centrifugal impeller with seals (Childs (17))

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Calculated transverse moment using bulk-flow model versus measured transverse moment

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Calculated direct moment using compressible code versus measured direct moment

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Basic clearances and pressure conditions of the impeller stage

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Predictions for the front shroud nondimensional radial force coefficient

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Predictions for the front shroud nondimensional tangential force coefficient

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Predicted nondimensional radial force coefficients for the back shroud

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Predicted nondimensional tangential force coefficients for the back shroud

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Nondimensional transverse moment coefficients for the back shroud

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Predicted nondimensional direct moment coefficients for the back shroud

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Predicted nondimensional radial force coefficients for the back shroud

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Predicted Log dec




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In