0
Research Papers: Power Engineering

Fouling Formation in 575 MV Tangential-Fired Pulverized-Coal Boiler

[+] Author and Article Information
E. Bar-Ziv1

 Ben-Gurion University, P.O. Box 653, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israelbarziv@bgu.ac.il

Y. Berman, R. Saveliev, M. Perelman, E. Korytnyi, B. Davidson

 Ben-Gurion University, P.O. Box 653, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel

B. Chudnovsky

 Israel Electric Corporation, P.O. Box 10, Haifa 31000, Israel

http://www.reaction-eng.com.

1

Corresponding author.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 132(12), 123001 (Sep 01, 2010) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4001297 History: Received December 10, 2009; Revised December 17, 2009; Published September 01, 2010; Online September 01, 2010

Due to the liberalization of the energy markets and the globalization of coal procurement, fuel management became of substantial importance to power plant operators, which are faced with new challenges when operating with coal types different from the originally designed ones for the specific boiler. Environmental regulations, combustion behavior, possible malfunctions and low operation, and maintenance cost became of essential importance. Fouling is one of the major challenges when new coals are being used. For that purpose we initiated a comprehensive study of fouling on the water-wall tubes in a 575 MW tangential-fired pulverized-coal utility boiler. We developed a methodology to evaluate fouling propensity of coals and specifically tested two bituminous South African coals: Billiton-Prime and Anglo-Kromdraai. The methodology is based on the adherence of ash particles on the water walls. Adherence of the ash particle depends on the particle properties, temperature, and velocity vector at the boundary layer of the water walls. In turn, the flow and temperature fields were determined by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. For CFD simulations we also needed the combustion kinetic parameters, emissivity, and thermal resistance, and they were all determined experimentally by a 50 kW test facility. Using this methodology we mapped off the locations where fouling is mostly to occur. It was found that our results fitted with the experience from the data obtained for these two coals in the Israel Electric Corporation utility boilers. The methodology developed was shown to be able to provide the fouling propensity of a certain coal, and yielded good prediction of the fouling behavior in utility boilers. Therefore, the methodology can assist in the optimization of the soot-blowing regime (location and frequency).

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2010 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Kinetic model for the devolatilization and combustion of coal

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Photographs of the probe with the ash deposit and SEM analyses of the deposit of AKD and Billiton-prime coals after 150 min from the insertion of the probe into the furnace at l/d=7.83

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Experimental results for the water-wall tube heat absorption versus time for the Billiton-Prime and AKD coals

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Rate of heat absorption loss versus time for coals AKD (black) and Billiton-Prime (dashed black)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Heat flux prediction (top) and measurement (bottom) at the front and right walls of the tangential-fired boiler for different resistances (left: clean furnace (R=0.002 m2 K/W−1), right: dirty furnace R=0.0038 m2 K/W−1 when the Biliton-Prime coal was burned. The predictions were done using operation parameters in Tables  45, and the model parameters from Tables  67.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Localized ash deposition rate (mass) on the front wall tangential-fired boiler

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Coal/ash particles in the water-wall boundary layer

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Schematics of (a) the radial cross section (top view) of the probe and the furnace, and (b) the axial cross section (side view) of the probe and the furnace (TC denotes thermocouple)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In