0
Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power | Volume 133 | Issue 12 | Research Paper
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Structures and Dynamics

Dynamic Loading on Turbofan Blades Due to Bird-Strike

[+] Author and Article Information
Sunil K. Sinha

Kevin E. Turner

 GE Aviation, M.D.: G-36, General Electric, 1 Neumann Way, Cincinnati, OH 45215Kevin.Turner1@.ge.com

Nitesh Jain

 Bangalore Engineering Center, JFWTC, Whitefield Road, Bangalore-560066, Karnataka, IndiaNitesh.Jain@ge.com

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 133(12), 122504 (Sep 01, 2011) (13 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4004126 History: Received April 09, 2011; Revised April 11, 2011; Published September 01, 2011; Online September 01, 2011
Article
References
Figures
Citing Articles

In the present paper, a hydrodynamic bird material model made up of water and air mixture is developed, which produces good correlation with the measured strain-gauge test data in a panel test. This parametric bird projectile model is used to generate the time-history of the transient dynamic loads on the turbofan engine blades for different size birds impacting at varying span locations of the fan blade. The problem is formulated in 3D vector dynamics equations using a nonlinear trajectory analysis approach. The analytical derivation captures the physics of the slicing process by considering the incoming bird in the shape of a cylindrical impactor as it comes into contact with the rotating fan blades modeled as a pretwisted plate with a camber. The contact-impact dynamic loading on the airfoil produced during the bird-strike is determined by solving the coupled nonlinear dynamical equations governing the movement of the bird-slice in time-domain using a sixth-order Runge-Kutta technique. The analytically predicted family of load time-history curves enables the blade designer to readily identify the critical impact location for peak dynamic loading condition during the bird-ingestion tests mandated for certification by the regulatory agencies.
FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2011 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

1
Code of Federal Regulations: Aeronautics and Space, 1990, Art. 33.76, Vol. 14 , Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Record Administration, Washington, DC.
2
Georgiadis, S., Gunnion, A. J., Thomson, R. S., and Cartwright, B. K., 2008, “Bird-Strike Simulation for Certification of the Boeing 787 Composite Moveable Trailing Edge,” Compos. Struct., 86  (1–3), pp. 258−268.  [CrossRef]
3
Niering, E., 1990, “Simulation of Bird Strikes on Turbine Engines,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 112 , pp. 573−578.  [CrossRef]
4
Martin, N. F., 1990, “Nonlinear Finite-Element Analysis to Predict Fan Blade Damage Soft Body Impact,” J. Propul.86 , pp. 445−450.  [CrossRef]
5
Vasco, T. J., 2000, “Fan Blade Bird-Strike Analysis and Design,” "Proceedings of the 6th International LS-DYNA Users Conference", Detroit, MI, Session 9–2, April 9−10,LSTC, Livermore, CA.
6
Jain, R., and Ramchandra, K., 2003, “Bird Impact Analysis of Pre-Stressed Fan Blades using Explicit Finite Element Code,” "IGTC 2003 Tokyo TS–009, Proceedings of the Int. Gas Turbine Congress", Tokyo, Japan November 2−7, IGTI, Norcross, GA., pp. 7.
7
Frischbier, J., and Kraus, A., 2005, “Multiple Stage Turbofan Bird Ingestion Analysis with ALE and SPH Methods,” "XVII International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines (ISABE)", Munich, Germany, Sept. 4−9, 2005, Paper No. ISABE–2005–1016 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, AIAA, Reston, VA.
8
Shmotin, Y. N., Chupin, P. V., Gabov, D. V., Ryabov, A. A., Romanov, V. I., and Kukanov, S. S., 2009, “Bird Strike Analysis of Aircraft Engine Fan,” "Proceedings of the 7th European LS-DYNA Users Conference", Salzburg, Austria, May 14−19, LSTC, Livermore, CA.
9
McCarthy, M. A., Xiao, J. R., McCarthy, C. T., Kamoulakos, A., Ramos, J., Gallaard, J. P., and Melito, V., 2004, “Modeling of Bird-Strike on an Aircraft Wing Leading Edge Made From Fiber Metal Laminates,” Appl. Compos. Mater., 11 (5), pp. 317−340.  [CrossRef]
10
Goyal, V. K., Huertas, C. A., Borrero, J. R., and Leutwiler, T. R., 2006, “Robust Bird-Strike Modeling Based on ALE Formulation Using LS-DYNA,” "47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference", Newport, Rhode Island, 4 May 2006, AIAA Paper No. 2006–1759, AIAA, Reston, VA.18 pp.
11
Schwer, L. E., and Whirley, R. G., 1999, “Impact of a 3D Woven Textile Composite Thin Panel: Damage and Failure Modeling,” Mech. Compos. Mater. Struct.6 (1), pp. 9−30.  [CrossRef]
12
Langrand, B., Bayart, A. S., Chauveau, Y., and Deletombe, E., 2002, “Assessment of Multi-Physics Fe Methods for Bird Strike Modelling - Application to a Metallic Riveted Airframe,” Int. J. Crashworthiness, 7 (4), pp. 415−428.  [CrossRef]
13
Anghileri, M., Castelletti, L. L., Invernizzi, F., and Mascheroni, M., 2005, “Birdstrike onto the Composite Intake of a Turbofan Engine,” "Proceedings of the 5th European LS-DYNA Users Conference", Birmingham, UK, May 25−26, LSTC, Livermore, CA.
14
McCallum, S. C., and Constantinou, C. “The Influence of Bird-Shape in Bird-Strike Analysis,” "Proc. 5th European LS-DYNA Users Conference", Birmingham, UK, May 25−26, 2005.
15
Johnson, A. F., and Holzapfel, M., 2006, “Numerical Prediction of Damage in Composite Structures From Soft Body Impacts,” J. Mater. Sci., 41 (20), pp. 6622−6630.  [CrossRef]
16
Smojver, I., and Ivančević, D., 2010, “Numerical Simulation of Bird Strike Damage Prediction in Airplane Flap Structure,” Compos. Struct.92 (9), pp. 2016−2026.  [CrossRef]
17
Guida, M., Marulo, F., Polito, T., Meo, M., and Riccio, M., 2009, “Design and Testing of a Fiber-Metal-Laminate Bird-Strike-Resistant Leading Edge,” J. of Aircr., 46 (6), pp. 2121−2129.  [CrossRef]
18
Sinha, S. K., and Jain, N., 2007, “Soft-Body Impact on Jet Engine Components Made-Up of Composites,” "International SAMPE Technical Conference", Cincinnati, OH. SAMPE, Covina, CA.
19
Kermanidis, T., Labeas, G., Sunaric, M., Johnson, A. F., and Holzapfel, M., 2006, “Bird Strike Simulation on a Novel Composite Leading Edge Design,” Int. J. Crashworthiness, 11 (3), pp. 189−201.  [CrossRef]
20
McCarthy, M. A., Xiao, J. R., Petrinic, N., Kamoulakos, A., and Melito, V., 2005, “Modelling Bird Impacts on an Aircraft Wing - Part 1: Material Modelling of the Fibre Metal Laminate Leading Edge Material With Continuum Damage Mechanics,” Int. J. Crashworthiness, 10 (1), pp. 41−49.  [CrossRef]
21
Xinjun, W., Zhenzhou, F., Fusheng, W., and Zhufeng, Y., 2007, “Dynamic Response Analysis of Bird Strike on Aircraft Windshield Based on Damage-Modified Nonlinear Viscoelastic Constitutive Relation,” Chin. J. Aeronaut., 20 , pp. 511−517.  [CrossRef]
22
Guida, M., Marulo, F., Meo, M., and Riccio, M., 2008, “Analysis of Bird Impact on a Composite Tailplane Leading Edge,” Appl. Compos. Mater.15 , pp. 241−257.  [CrossRef]
23
Hanssen, A. G., Girard, Y., Olovsson, L., Berstad, T., and Langseth, M., 2006, “A Numerical Model for Bird Strike of Aluminum Foam-Based Sandwich Panels,” Int. J. Impact Eng., 32 , pp. 1127−1144.  [CrossRef]
24
Airoldi, A., and Cacchione, B., 2006, “Modelling of Impact Forces and Pressures in Lagrangian Bird Strike Analyses,” Int. J. Impact Eng., 32 , pp. 1651−1677.  [CrossRef]
25
Teichman, H. C., and Tadros, R. N., 1991, “Analytical and Experimental Simulation of Fan Blade Behavior and Damage Under Bird Impact,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 113 , pp. 582−594.  [CrossRef]
26
Mao, R. H., Meguid, S. A., and Ng, T. Y., 2008, “Transient Three Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of a Bird Striking a Fan Blade,” Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des., 4 (1), pp. 79−96.  [CrossRef]
27
Lavoie, M.-A., Gakwaya, A., Ensam, M. N., and Zimcik, D. G., 2007, “Review of Existing Numerical Methods and Validation Procedure Available for Bird Strike Modeling,” Int. Conf. Comp. Exp. Eng. Sci.. (ICCES), 2 (4), pp. 111−118.  [CrossRef]
28
Nizampatnam, L. S., 2007, “Models and Methods for Bird Strike Load Predictions,” "Ph.D. thesis", Wichita State University, Wichita, KS.
29
Khulief, Y. A., 2010, “Numerical Modeling of Impulsive Events in Mechanical Systems,” Int. J. Model. Simulat.30 (1), pp. 80−86.  [CrossRef]
30
Shivkumar, K. N., Elber, W., and Illg, W., 1985, “Prediction of Impact Force and Duration Due to Low-Velocity Impact on Circular Composite Laminates,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 52 (3), pp. 674−680.  [CrossRef]
31
Sinha, S. K., and Zentner, M. M., 1986, “Dynamic Bending Stresses in Thin Elastic Plates Due to Impact by Spherical Projectile,” "10th U.S. National Congress of Applied Mechanics", University of Texas at Austin, TX.
32
Doyle, J. F., 1987, “Experimentally Determining the Contact Force During the Transverse Impact of an Orthotropic Plate,” J. Sound Vib.118 (3), pp. 441−448.  [CrossRef]
33
Hemmi, K., Nishikawa, M., and Takeda, N., 2008, “Prediction of the Foreign-Object Impact Force on the Composite Fan Blade,” "Design, Manufacturing and Applications of Composites: Proceedings of the 7th Joint Canada-Japan Workshop on Composites", pp. 101−108.
34
Wilbeck, J. S., and Rand, J. L., 1981, “The Development of a Substitute Bird Model,” ASME J. Eng. Power, 103 , pp. 725−730.  [CrossRef]
35
Kim, H., and Kedward, K. T., 2000, “Modeling Hail Ice Impacts and Predicting Impact Damage Initiation in Composite Structures,” AIAA J., 38 (7), pp. 1278−1288.  [CrossRef]
36
Fehlberg, E., 1964, “New High Order Runge-Kutta Formulas With Stepsize Control for Systems of First- and Second Order Differential Equations,” ZAMM, 44 , pp. 17−29  [CrossRef].
37
Olsson, R., 2003, “Closed Form Prediction of Peak Load and Delamination Onset Under Small Mass Impact,” Compos. Struct.59 , pp. 341−349.  [CrossRef]
38
Van Paepegema, W., Shulev, A., Moentjens, A., Harizanova, J., Degrieck, J., and Sainov, V., 2008, “Use of Projection Moiré for Measuring the Instantaneous Out-of-Plane Deflections of Composite Plates Subject to Bird Strike,” Opt. Lasers Eng., 46 , pp. 527−534.  [CrossRef]
39
Timoshenko, S., and Woinowsky-Krieger, S., 1959, "Theory of Plates and Shells"2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 378−380.
40
Sinha, S. K., and Turner, K. E., 2011, “Natural Frequencies of a Pre-Twisted Blade in a Centrifugal Force Field,” J. Sound Vib.330 (11), pp. 2655−2681.  [CrossRef]
41
Chen, G., Coleman, M. P., and Liu, K., 1998, “Boundary Stabilization of Donnell’s Shallow Circular Cylindrical Shell,” J. Sound Vib.209 (2), pp. 265−298.  [CrossRef]
42
Sinha, S. K., 2007, “Combined Torsional-Bending-Axial Dynamics of a Twisted Rotating Cantilever Timoshenko Beam With Contact-Impact Loads at the Free End,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 74 , pp. 505−522.  [CrossRef]
43
Sinha, S. K., and Dorbala, S., 2009, “Dynamic Loads in the Fan Containment Structure of a Turbofan Engine,” ASCE J. Aerospace Eng., 22 (3), pp. 260−269.  [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
+Time-history of the bird-slice load in the tangential direction of the fan-rotor on a 20 bladed rotor due to 2 kg bird at 100 m/s
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Time-history of the bird-slice load in the tangential direction of the fan-rotor on a 20 bladed rotor due to 2 kg bird at 100 m/s
Figure 12

Time-history of the bird-slice load in the tangential direction of the fan-rotor on a 20 bladed rotor due to 2 kg bird at 100 m/s

Grahic Jump Location
+LS-DYNA simulation of a 2 kg bird-strike on a 3-bladed sector of a typical turbofan rotor
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
LS-DYNA simulation of a 2 kg bird-strike on a 3-bladed sector of a typical turbofan rotor
Figure 11

LS-DYNA simulation of a 2 kg bird-strike on a 3-bladed sector of a typical turbofan rotor

Grahic Jump Location
+Comparison of strain gauge dynamic response from LS-DYNA vs test data (widthwise strain gauge - SG8)
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Comparison of strain gauge dynamic response from LS-DYNA vs test data (widthwise strain gauge - SG8)
Figure 10

Comparison of strain gauge dynamic response from LS-DYNA vs test data (widthwise strain gauge - SG8)

Grahic Jump Location
+Comparison of strain gauge dynamic response from LS-DYNA vs test data (lengthwise strain gauge – SG3)
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Comparison of strain gauge dynamic response from LS-DYNA vs test data (lengthwise strain gauge – SG3)
Figure 9

Comparison of strain gauge dynamic response from LS-DYNA vs test data (lengthwise strain gauge – SG3)

Grahic Jump Location
+(a) Rectangular composite panel with strain gauges (SG3 and SG 8) being impacted by a bird-cylinder moving at 92.66 m/s. (b) LS-DYNA results showing the deformation of a bird cylinder during the bird-strike after 0.4 ms of initial contact.
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
(a) Rectangular composite panel with strain gauges (SG3 and SG 8) being impacted by a bird-cylinder moving at 92.66 m/s. (b) LS-DYNA results showing the deformation of a bird cylinder during the bird-strike after 0.4 ms of initial contact.
Figure 8

(a) Rectangular composite panel with strain gauges (SG3 and SG 8) being impacted by a bird-cylinder moving at 92.66 m/s. (b) LS-DYNA results showing the deformation of a bird cylinder during the bird-strike after 0.4 ms of initial contact.

Grahic Jump Location
+Time-history of contact-impact loads (FBird-slice) on a typical fan blade (L/C =2), by different size birds at the critical impact location of 43% of span
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Time-history of contact-impact loads (FBird-slice) on a typical fan blade (L/C =2), by different size birds at the critical impact location of 43% of span
Figure 7

Time-history of contact-impact loads (FBird-slice) on a typical fan blade (L/C =2), by different size birds at the critical impact location of 43% of span

Grahic Jump Location
+(a) 25% span impact, (b) 50% span impact, (c) 75% span impact. Time-history of contact-impact loads (F(t)Bird-slice ) on a typical fan blade (L/C = 2), by different size birds at the leading edge span locations (a) 25%, (b) 50%, (c) 75%.
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
(a) 25% span impact, (b) 50% span impact, (c) 75% span impact. Time-history of contact-impact loads (F(t)Bird-slice ) on a typical fan blade (L/C = 2), by different size birds at the leading edge span locations (a) 25%, (b) 50%, (c) 75%.
Figure 6

(a) 25% span impact, (b) 50% span impact, (c) 75% span impact. Time-history of contact-impact loads (F(t)Bird-slice ) on a typical fan blade (L/C = 2), by different size birds at the leading edge span locations (a) 25%, (b) 50%, (c) 75%.

Grahic Jump Location
+Analytically computed bird-slice trajectory on the concave surface of an airfoil blade for a typical 75% span-shot
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Analytically computed bird-slice trajectory on the concave surface of an airfoil blade for a typical 75% span-shot
Figure 5

Analytically computed bird-slice trajectory on the concave surface of an airfoil blade for a typical 75% span-shot

Grahic Jump Location
+A pretwisted and curved airfoil surface as viewed from the blade tip-side
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
A pretwisted and curved airfoil surface as viewed from the blade tip-side
Figure 4

A pretwisted and curved airfoil surface as viewed from the blade tip-side

Grahic Jump Location
+Effect of relative velocity vector during slicing action of the fan blade
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Effect of relative velocity vector during slicing action of the fan blade
Figure 3

Effect of relative velocity vector during slicing action of the fan blade

Grahic Jump Location
+Bird cylinder coming in contact with rotating turbofan blades and local coordinate system
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Bird cylinder coming in contact with rotating turbofan blades and local coordinate system
Figure 2

Bird cylinder coming in contact with rotating turbofan blades and local coordinate system

Grahic Jump Location
+A typical plastically deformed bulge in the leading edge of a metal turbofan blade after slicing action during bird-strike
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
A typical plastically deformed bulge in the leading edge of a metal turbofan blade after slicing action during bird-strike
Figure 1

A typical plastically deformed bulge in the leading edge of a metal turbofan blade after slicing action during bird-strike

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Control and Operational Performance
Closed-Cycle Gas Turbines> Chapter 5
Stress Analysis of Gas Turbine Blade under Different Loads Using Finite Element Modeling
International Conference on Mechanical and Electrical Technology, 3rd, (ICMET-China 2011), Volumes 1–3
Congestion Management in Deregulation by Generation Rescheduling and Load Shedding Using Evolutionary Programming Based OPF
International Conference on Mechanical and Electrical Technology, 3rd, (ICMET-China 2011), Volumes 1–3
Influence of Coefficient of Friction on the Fretting Stresses
International Conference on Mechanical and Electrical Technology, 3rd, (ICMET-China 2011), Volumes 1–3
Stress Intensity Factor Estimation for a Crack Emanating from an Acme Threaded Bolt
International Conference on Mechanical and Electrical Technology, 3rd, (ICMET-China 2011), Volumes 1–3
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy. | Accept
Sign In