0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Controls, Diagnostics, and Instrumentation

Integrating Systems Engineering Into the USAF Academy Capstone Gas Turbine Engine Course

[+] Author and Article Information
August J. Rolling, Aaron R. Byerley, Charles F. Wisniewski

 USAF Academy, HQ USAFA/DFAN, 2410 Faculty Drive, USAFA, CO 80840

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 134(2), 021601 (Dec 07, 2011) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4004397 History: Received April 10, 2011; Accepted May 27, 2011; Published December 07, 2011; Online December 07, 2011

This paper is intended to serve as a template for incorporating technical management majors into a traditional engineering design course. In 2002, the Secretary of the Air Force encouraged the United States Air Force (USAF) Academy to initiate a new interdisciplinary academic major related to systems engineering. This direction was given in an effort to help meet the Air Force’s growing need for “systems” minded officers to manage the development and acquisition of its ever more complex weapons systems. The curriculum for the new systems engineering management (SEM) major is related to the “engineering of large, complex systems and the integration of the many subsystems that comprise the larger system” and differs in the level of technical content from the traditional engineering major. The program allows emphasis in specific cadet—selected engineering tracks with additional course work in human systems, operations research, and program management. Specifically, this paper documents how individual SEM majors have been integrated into aeronautical engineering design teams within a senior level capstone course to complete the preliminary design of a gas turbine engine. As the Aeronautical Engineering (AE) cadets performed the detailed engine design, the SEM cadets were responsible for tracking performance, cost, schedule, and technical risk. Internal and external student assessments indicate that this integration has been successful at exposing both the AE majors and the SEM majors to the benefits of “systems thinking” by giving all the opportunity to employ SE tools in the context of a realistic aircraft engine design project.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2012 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Technical management processes overview from SYS101 Fundamentals of SPRDE [4]

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Design process from Aircraft Engine Design [5]

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Organizational chart, top-level work breakdown structure example

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Thermodynamic ICD (DID 4) example

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Risk chart example

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Combustor analysis of alternatives example

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In