0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Cycle Innovations

Calculations of Cooled Turbine Efficiency

[+] Author and Article Information
J. H. Horlock

Whittle Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0DY, UK

Leonardo Torbidoni

 Ansaldo Energia, 16152 Genoa, Italyleonardo.torbidoni@aen.ansaldo.it

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 130(1), 011703 (Jan 11, 2008) (5 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2771250 History: Received July 05, 2006; Revised August 09, 2006; Published January 11, 2008

The efficiency of a cooled turbine stage has been discussed in the literature. All proposed definitions compare the actual power output with an ideal output, which has to be determined; but usually, one of two definitions has been used by turbine designers. In the first, the so-called Hartsel efficiency, the mainstream gas flow, and the various coolant flows to rotor and stator are assumed to expand separately and isentropically to the backpressure. In the second, it is assumed that these flows mix at constant (mainstream) gas pressure before expanding isentropically (sometimes, the rotor coolant flow is ignored in this definition). More recently, it has been suggested that a thermodynamically sounder definition is one in which the gas and coolant flows mix reversibly and adiabatically before isentropic expansion to the backpressure. In the current paper, these three efficiencies are compared, for a typical stage—the first cooled stage of a multistage industrial gas turbine. It is shown that all the efficiencies fall more or less linearly with increase of the fractional (total) coolant flow. It is also shown that the new definition of efficiency gives values considerably lower than the other two efficiencies, which are more widely used at present. Finally, the various irreversibilities associated with the flow through a cooled turbine are calculated. Although all these irreversibilities increase with the fractional coolant flow, it is shown that the “thermal” irreversibility associated with film cooling is higher than the other irreversibilities at large fractional coolant flow.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2008 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

fr-mix, Hartsel, and mp-mix efficiencies compared for varying coolant flow fractions

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Timko efficiency compared with Hartsel and mp-mix efficiencies for varying coolant flow fractions

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Energy losses (nondimensional form) for the complete stage (stator plus rotor) and for varying coolant flow fractions. All these losses are included within the fr-mix efficiency

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In