Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions

On the Use of Thermoacoustic Analysis for Robust Burner Design

[+] Author and Article Information
Valter Bellucci1

 ALSTOM, CH-5401 Baden, Switzerland

Dariusz Nowak, Weiqun Geng, Christian Steinbach

 ALSTOM, CH-5401 Baden, Switzerland


Present address: Combustion Research Laboratory, Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI), CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 130(3), 031506 (Apr 03, 2008) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2800348 History: Received May 23, 2007; Revised June 13, 2007; Published April 03, 2008

Advanced thermoacoustic analysis is now routinely used in gas turbine combustor development. A thermoacoustic approach based on a combination of numerical analysis (CFD and three-dimensional acoustics), acoustic network models, and dedicated measurements of acoustic flame response is well accepted across the industry. However, its application to specific combustor upgrade or development programs in “prediction mode” as opposed to “analysis mode” remains a challenge. This is mainly due to the large sensitivity of the complex methodology to key inputs, such as flame transfer functions, that can be only predicted in the burner design phase. This paper discusses an example where we made an effort to apply the thermoacoustic approach in predictive mode. The example refers to the upgrade of a first generation diffusion burner with a partially premix burner to achieve low emissions. Thermoacoustic instabilities were predicted as a limiting factor for combustor operation and thus a design parameter was identified to perform the thermoacoustic combustor tuning at engine level. A particular challenge of this development program was that no test rig was available. Therefore, the new premix burner was directly installed into a field engine where it was successfully tested.

Copyright © 2008 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

EV burner principle

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

LEV single burner

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

LEV burner concept

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Thermoacoustic network

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

FEM models of engine hood with SDB and LEV burner

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Acoustic modes of SDB and LEV combustor

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Pressure pulsations in SDB combustor: engine measurements versus TA3 network simulations

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Pressure pulsations in LEV combustor: TA3 network simulations with minimum and maximum heat release saturations for the three axial lance positions L1, L2 and Lopt(L1<Lopt<L2)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Pressure pulsations in LEV combustor: engine tests for axial lance positions L1 and Lopt

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

NOx emissions from engine tests (no water injection): SDB versus LEV with axial lance position Lopt

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Pressure pulsations in LEV combustor: TA3 network simulations for axial lance positions L1 and Lopt




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In