Research Papers: Nuclear Power

A Method to Evaluate Fission Gas Release During Irradiation Testing of Spherical Fuel

[+] Author and Article Information
Hanno van der Merwe1

 Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (Pty) Ltd., 1279 Mike Crawford Avenue, Centurion 0046, South Africahanno.vdmerwe@pbmr.co.za

Johan Venter

 Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (Pty) Ltd., 1279 Mike Crawford Avenue, Centurion 0046, South Africa


Corresponding author.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 131(5), 052902 (Jun 09, 2009) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.3097131 History: Received October 23, 2008; Revised November 10, 2008; Published June 09, 2009

The evaluation of fission gas release from spherical fuel during irradiation testing is critical to understand expected fuel performance under real reactor conditions. Online measurements of krypton and xenon fission products explain coated particle performance and contributions from graphitic matrix materials used in fuel manufacture and irradiation rig materials. Methods that are being developed to accurately evaluate fission gas release are described here together with examples of evaluations performed on irradiation tests HFR-K5, -K6, and EU1bis.

Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

R/B versus half-life graph, HFR-K6/4, cycle 24

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Measured and calculated X135 meR/B comparison for test element K6/4

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Measured K88rR/B and sphere /4 temperatures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Measured and calculated K88rR/B for contamination and one failed particle

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Measured and calculated K88rR/B

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Measured and calculated K85 mrR/B

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Measured and calculated X135eR/B

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

R/B versus half-life graph for HFR-EU1bis, cycle 13

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

R/B versus half-life graph, HFR-EU1bis, cycle 10

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Effective uranium contamination in the matrix material for test element HFR-K6/1

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

R/B versus half-life graph, HFR-K5/2, cycle 12

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

R/B versus half-life graph, HFR-K5/2, cycle 24

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Measured and calculated K88rR/B comparison for test element K6/2

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

R/B versus half-life graph, HFR-K6/4, cycle 4




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In