0
Research Papers: Nuclear Power

Ways to Increase Efficiency of the High-Temperature Gas Reactor Coupled With the Gas-Turbine Power Conversion Unit

[+] Author and Article Information
V. F. Golovko

 OKB Mechanical Engineering, Burnakovsky Proezd 15, Nizhny Novgorod 603074, Russiagolovko@okbm.nnov.ru

N. G. Kodochigov, A. V. Vasyaev

 OKB Mechanical Engineering, Burnakovsky Proezd 15, Nizhny Novgorod 603074, Russia

A. Shenoy

 General Atomics, P.O. Box 85608, San Diego, CA 92186-5608arkal.shenoy@gat.com

C. B. Baxi

 General Atomics, P.O. Box 85608, San Diego, CA 92186-5608

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 131(5), 052903 (Jun 09, 2009) (5 pages) doi:10.1115/1.3097133 History: Received October 28, 2008; Revised December 04, 2008; Published June 09, 2009

This paper deals with the issue of increasing efficiency of nuclear power plants with the modular high-temperature gas reactor (HTGR) and direct gas-turbine cycle. It should be noted that only this combination can highlight the advantages of the HTGR, namely, the ability to heat helium to about 1000°C, in comparison with other reactor plants for electricity generation. The HTGR has never been used in the direct gas-turbine cycle. At present, several designs of such commercial plants are at the stage of experimental validation of main technical features. In Russia, OKB Mechanical Engineering together with General Atomics (United States) are developing the GT-MHR project with a reactor power of 600 MW, a reactor outlet helium temperature of 850°C, and an efficiency of about 45.2%; the South African Republic is developing the РBMR project with a reactor power of 400 MW, a reactor outlet helium temperature of 900°C, and an efficiency of about 42%; and Japan is developing the GTHTR-300 project with a reactor power of 600 MW, a reactor outlet helium temperature of 850°C, and an efficiency of about 45.6%. As it has been proven by technical and economic estimations, one of the most important factors for successful promotion of reactor designs is their net efficiency, which must not be lower than 47%. A significant advantage of a reactor plant with the HTGR and gas-turbine power conversion unit over the steam cycle is considerable simplification of the power unit layout and reduction in the required equipment and systems (no steam generators, no turbine hall including steam lines, condenser, deaerator, etc.), which makes the gas-turbine power conversion unit more compact and less costly in production, operation, and maintenance. However, in spite of this advantage, it seems that in the projects currently being developed, the potential of the gas-turbine cycle and high-temperature reactor to more efficiently generate electricity is not fully used. For example, in modern reactor plants with highly recuperative steam cycle with supercritical heat parameters, the net efficiency of electricity generation reaches 50–55%. There are three methods of the Brayton cycle carnotization: regeneration, helium cooldown during compression, and heat supply during expansion. These methods can be used both separately and in combination, which gives a total of seven complex heat flow diagrams. Besides, there are ways to increase helium temperature at the reactor inlet and outlet, to reduce hydraulic losses in the helium path, to increase the turbomachine rotation speed in order to improve the turbine and compressor efficiency, to reduce helium leaks in the circulation path, etc. The analysis of GT-MHR, PBMR, and GTHTR-300 development experience allows identification of the main ways of increasing the efficiency by selecting optimal parameters and design solutions for the reactor and power conversion unit. This paper estimates the probability of reaching the maximum electricity generation efficiency in reactor plants with the HTGR and gas-turbine cycle with account of the up-to-date development status of major reactor plant components (reactor, vessels, turbocompressor, generator, heat exchange equipment, and structural materials).

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Efficiency as a function of cooler number with a helium temperature of 850°C at the turbine inlet

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Influence of helium temperatures of 950°C (1), 900°C (2), 850°C (3), 800°C (4), and 750°C (5) at the reactor outlet (turbine inlet) on the GT-MHR efficiency at a recuperator effectiveness of 0.95

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Influence of compression ratio and recuperator effectiveness of 0.95 (1), 0.9 (2), and 0.85 (3) on the GT-MHR efficiency at a helium inlet turbine temperature of 850°C

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Cycle efficiency dependence on turbine inlet gas temperature with account of leakage for turbine cooling

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In