Gas Turbine Field Performance Determination: Sources of Uncertainties

M. Pinelli; P. R. Spina

doi:10.1115/1.1413464

Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power | Volume 124 | Issue 1 | TECHNICAL PAPERS

< Previous Article Next Article >

TECHNICAL PAPERS

Gas Turbine Field Performance Determination: Sources of Uncertainties

M. Pinelli and P. R. Spina

[+] Author Affiliations

M. Pinelli

Dipartimento di Ingegneria, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy

P. R. Spina

DIEM-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 124(1), 155-160 (Feb 01, 2000) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1413464 History: Received November 01, 1999; Revised February 01, 2000

Article

References

Figures

Tables

Purchase this Content

$25.00

Purchase

Learn about subscription and purchase options

Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Layout of the gas turbine with the measurements considered

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Error on the estimated parameters due to the error on the measurements Q_m and Q_WP (Case 1a)

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Absolute value of the weighting factors of the Q_m measurements on the estimated parameters (Case 1)

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Absolute value of the weighting factors of the Q_WP measurements on the estimated parameters (Case 1)

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Contribution ΔX_ji due to a one percent variation on the fixed parameters η_cc,Δp_cc, and M_cool (Case 1)

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Error on the estimated parameters due to the error on the measurements Q_m and Q_WP (Case 2a)

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Contribution ΔX_ji due to a one percent variation on the fixed parameters η_cc,Δp_cc,M_cool, and η_pt (Case 2a)

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Error on the estimated parameters due to the error on the measurements Q_m and Q_WP (Case 2b)

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Contribution ΔX_ji due to a one percent variation on the fixed parameters η_cc,Δp_cc,M_cool, and μ_pt (Case 2b)

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Web of Science® Times Cited: 0

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

PDF
Email

You must be logged in and have an account to share content.

Return to: Gas Turbine Field Performance Determination: Sources of Uncertainties

Copyright in the material you requested is held by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (unless otherwise noted). This email ability is provided as a courtesy, and by using it you agree that you are requesting the material solely for personal, non-commercial use, and that it is subject to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers' Terms of Use. The information provided in order to email this topic will not be used to send unsolicited email, nor will it be furnished to third parties. Please refer to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers' Privacy Policy for further information.
Share
Get Citation

Pinelli MM, Spina PR. Gas Turbine Field Performance Determination: Sources of Uncertainties. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2000;124(1):155-160. doi:10.1115/1.1413464.

Download citation file:

RIS (Zotero)

EndNote

BibTex

Medlars

ProCite

RefWorks

Reference Manager

© Copyright
Get Alerts

Processing your request... Please Wait.

Gas Turbine Field Performance Determination: Sources of Uncertainties

References

Figures

Layout of the gas turbine with the measurements considered

Error on the estimated parameters due to the error on the measurements Q_m and Q_WP (Case 1a)

Absolute value of the weighting factors of the Q_m measurements on the estimated parameters (Case 1)

Absolute value of the weighting factors of the Q_WP measurements on the estimated parameters (Case 1)

Contribution ΔX_ji due to a one percent variation on the fixed parameters η_cc,Δp_cc, and M_cool (Case 1)

Error on the estimated parameters due to the error on the measurements Q_m and Q_WP (Case 2a)

Contribution ΔX_ji due to a one percent variation on the fixed parameters η_cc,Δp_cc,M_cool, and η_pt (Case 2a)

Error on the estimated parameters due to the error on the measurements Q_m and Q_WP (Case 2b)

Contribution ΔX_ji due to a one percent variation on the fixed parameters η_cc,Δp_cc,M_cool, and μ_pt (Case 2b)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Related Content

Journals

Conference Proceedings

eBooks

Gas Turbine Field Performance Determination: Sources of Uncertainties

References

Figures

Layout of the gas turbine with the measurements considered

Error on the estimated parameters due to the error on the measurements Qm and QWP (Case 1a)

Absolute value of the weighting factors of the Qm measurements on the estimated parameters (Case 1)

Absolute value of the weighting factors of the QWP measurements on the estimated parameters (Case 1)

Contribution ΔXji due to a one percent variation on the fixed parameters ηcc,Δpcc, and Mcool (Case 1)

Error on the estimated parameters due to the error on the measurements Qm and QWP (Case 2a)

Contribution ΔXji due to a one percent variation on the fixed parameters ηcc,Δpcc,Mcool, and ηpt (Case 2a)

Error on the estimated parameters due to the error on the measurements Qm and QWP (Case 2b)

Contribution ΔXji due to a one percent variation on the fixed parameters ηcc,Δpcc,Mcool, and μpt (Case 2b)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Related Content

Journals

Conference Proceedings

eBooks

Error on the estimated parameters due to the error on the measurements Q_m and Q_WP (Case 1a)

Absolute value of the weighting factors of the Q_m measurements on the estimated parameters (Case 1)

Absolute value of the weighting factors of the Q_WP measurements on the estimated parameters (Case 1)

Contribution ΔX_ji due to a one percent variation on the fixed parameters η_cc,Δp_cc, and M_cool (Case 1)

Error on the estimated parameters due to the error on the measurements Q_m and Q_WP (Case 2a)

Contribution ΔX_ji due to a one percent variation on the fixed parameters η_cc,Δp_cc,M_cool, and η_pt (Case 2a)

Error on the estimated parameters due to the error on the measurements Q_m and Q_WP (Case 2b)

Contribution ΔX_ji due to a one percent variation on the fixed parameters η_cc,Δp_cc,M_cool, and μ_pt (Case 2b)