Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions

Impact of Cooling Air Injection on the Primary Combustion Zone of a Swirl Burner

[+] Author and Article Information
A. Marosky

e-mail: marosky@td.mw.tum.de

T. Sattelmayer

Lehrstuhl für Thermodynamik,
Technische Universität München,
85748 Garching, Germany

F. Magni

Alstom Ltd.,
5401 Baden, Switzerland

1Address all correspondence to this author.

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received June 19, 2012; final manuscript received June 27, 2012; published online October 11, 2012. Editor: Dilip R. Ballal.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 134(12), 121502 (Oct 11, 2012) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4007330 History: Received June 19, 2012; Revised June 27, 2012

In most dry, low NOx combustor designs, the front panel impingement cooling air is directly injected into the combustor primary zone. As this air partially mixes with the swirling flow of premixed reactants from the burner prior to completion of heat release, it reduces the effective equivalence ratio in the flame and has a beneficial effect on NOx emissions. However, the fluctuations of the equivalence ratio in the flame potentially increase heat release fluctuations and influence flame stability. Since both effects are not yet fully understood, isothermal experiments are made in a water channel, where high speed planar laser-induced fluorescence (HSPLIF) is applied to study the cooling air distribution and its fluctuations in the primary zone. In addition, the flow field is measured with high speed particle image velocimetry (HSPIV). Both mixing and flow field are also analyzed in numerical studies using isothermal large eddy simulation (LES), and the simulation results are compared with the experimental data. Of particular interest is the influence of the injection configuration and cooling air momentum variation on the cooling air penetration and dispersion. The spatial and temporal quality of mixing is quantified with probability density functions (PDF). Based on the results regarding the equivalence ratio fluctuations, regions with potential negative effects on combustion stability are identified. The strongest fluctuations are observed in the outer shear layer of the swirling flow, which exerts a strong suction effect on the cooling air. Interestingly, the cooling air dilutes the recirculation zone of the swirling flow. In the reacting case, this effect is expected to lead to a decrease of the temperature in the flame-anchoring zone below the adiabatic flame temperature of the premixed reactant, which may have an adverse effect on flame stability.

Copyright © 2012 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Venkataraman, K., Preston, L., Simons, D., Lee, B., Lee, J., and Santavicca, D., 1999, “Mechanism of Combustion Instability in a Lean Premixed Dump Combustor,” J. Propul. Power, 15(6), 909–918. [CrossRef]
Lieuwen, T., Neumeier, Y., and Zinn, B., 1998, “The Role of Unmixedness and Chemical Kinetics in Driving Combustion Instabilities in Lean Premixed Combustors,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 135, pp. 193–211. [CrossRef]
Cohen, J., and Anderson, T., 1996, “Experimental Investigation of Near-Blowout Instabilities in a Lean, Premixed Step Combustor, 34th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 15–18, Paper No. AIAA-1996-819.
Sangl, J., Mayer, C., and Sattelmayer, T., 2011, “Dynamic Adaptation of Aerodynamic Flame Stabilization of a Premix Swirl Burner to Fuel Reactivity Using Fuel Momentum,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 133(7), p. 071501. [CrossRef]
Mayer, C., Sangl, J., Sattelmayer, T., Lachaux, T., and Bernero, S., 2012, “Study on the Operational Window of a Swirl Stabilized Syngas Burner Under Atmospheric and High Pressure Conditions,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(3), p. 031506. [CrossRef]
Hasselbrink, E. F., and Mungal, M. G., 2001, “Transverse Jets and Jet Flames. Part 2. Velocity and OH Field Imaging,” J. Fluid Mech., 443, pp. 27–68 [CrossRef].
Liscinsky, D., True, B., and Holdeman, J., 1993, “Experimental Investigation of Crossflow Jet Mixing in a Rectangular Duct,” 29th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit 1993, Monterey, CA, June 28–30, AIAA Paper No. 93-2037.
Pernpeinter, M., Lauer, M., Hirsch, C., and Sattelmayer, T., 2011, “A Method to Obtain Planar Mixture Fraction Statistics in Turbulent Flows Seeded With Tracer Particles,” Proceedings ofASME Turbo Expo 2011, Vancouver, Canada, ASME Paper No. GT2011-46844. [CrossRef]
Tropea, C., Yaris, A. L., and Foss, J. F., eds., 2007, Handbook of Experimental Fluid Mechanics, Springer, New York.
LAVISION, Product Manual, LIF in Liquid Fluids, 2009, LaVision GmbH, Göttingen, Germany.
Nicoud, F., and Ducros, F., 1999, “Subgrid-Scale Stress Modelling Based on the Square of the Velocity Gradient Tensor,” Flow, Turbul. Combust., 62, pp. 183–200. [CrossRef]
Shih, T., Liou, W. W., Shabbir, A., Yang, Z., and Zhu, J., 1995, “A New k-Epsilon Eddy Viscosity Model for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Flows,” Comput. Fluids, 24(3), pp. 227–238. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Modular design of the front plate (left) and dimensions of the three configurations of cooling air injection (right)—small annular gap (SAG), large annular gap (LAG), injection rows (INJ)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Principle of the HSPLIF setup of water test rig

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Camera calibration curve

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Signal decay in raw data of uniform concentration distribution

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Scheme of absorption correction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Fluctuation of laser intensity

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Mean axial flow field (HSPIV): without injection (WO); detail of cooling air injection through injector rows (INJ); small annular gap (SAG); large annular gap (LAG)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Mean (top) and RMS (bottom) of mixture fraction (HSPLIF): injector rows (INJ); small annular gap (SAG); large annular gap (LAG)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Mean mixture fraction by HSPLIF and LES for INJ, SAG, and LAG

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Data points for evaluation of mixture fraction PDF

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Mixture fraction PDF along burner center axis for LAG, SAG, INJ with constant injection momentum

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Scaled mixture fraction PDF along burner center axis for varying momentum (LAG)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Scaled mixture fraction PDF field for varying injection momentum (LAG)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In