0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Structures and Dynamics

Experimental Investigation on the Forced Response of a Dummy Counter-Rotating Turbine Stage With Friction Damping

[+] Author and Article Information
Teresa Berruti

e-mail: teresa.berruti@polito.it

e-mail: vanni.maschio@gmail.com
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
Politecnico di Torino,
Corso Duca degli Abruzzi,
24 10129 Turin, Italy

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power. Manuscript received June 19, 2012; final manuscript received July 3, 2012; published online October 11, 2012. Editor: Dilip R. Ballal.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 134(12), 122502 (Oct 11, 2012) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4007325 History: Received June 19, 2012; Revised July 03, 2012

The paper shows the results of the experimental activity about the dynamics of a stage of a counter-rotating turbine of an open rotor architecture engine. The tests presented here explore the dynamic behavior of a simplified counter-rotating turbine stage. The test results show the dynamic behavior of a counter-rotating turbine stage and highlight the importance of the presence of dry friction for vibration damping.

Copyright © 2012 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Schimming, P., 2003, “Counter Rotating Fans—An Aircraft Propulsion for the Future?,” J. Thermal Sci., 112(2), pp. 97–103. [CrossRef]
Page, L., 2009, “NASA Working on ‘Open Rotor’ Green (but Loud) Jets: Want to Save the Planet? Put Up With Noisier Airports,” The Register, June 12, 2009, http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/06/12/nasa_open_rotor_trials/
NASA, 1987, “Full Scale Technology Demonstration of a Modern Counter rotating Unducted Fan Engine Concept—Design Report,” NASA report CR-180867.
NASA, 1987, “Full Scale Technology Demonstration of a Modern Counter rotating Unducted Fan Engine Concept—Engine Test,” NASA report CR-180867.
Ewins, D. J., 2010, “Control of Vibration and Resonance in Aero Engines and Rotating Machinery—An Overview,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 87, pp. 504–510. [CrossRef]
Castanier, M. P., and Pierre, C., 2006, “Modeling and Analysis of Mistuned Bladed Disk Vibration: Status and Emerging Directions,” J. Propul. Power, 22(2), pp. 384–396. [CrossRef]
Cha, D., and Sinha, A., 2011, “Computation of the Optimal Normal Load for a Mistuned and Frictionally Damped Bladed Disk Assembly Under Different Types of Excitation,” J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn., 6, pp. 1–10. [CrossRef]
Zucca, S., Filippi, S, Droetti, F, and Gola, M. M, 2006, “Forced Response of Interlocked Vane Segments: Numerical Prediction and Experimental Results,” ASME 8th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis (ESDA2006) 2006, Torino, Italy, July 4–7, Vol. 3, pp. 413–420 [CrossRef].
DREAM Milestone 3.3.1A PDR Turbine Layout, AVIO.
DREAM Milestone 3.3.6A CDR Blades damping design, June 25, 2010, POLITO.
Pierre, C., Judge, J., Ceccio, S. L., and Castanier, M. P., 2002, “Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Random and Intentional Mistuning on the Vibration of Bladed Disks,” Proceedings of the 7th National High Cycle Fatigue Conference, Palm Beach Gardens, FL, May 14–17.
Firrone, C. M., Berruti, T., 2012, “Non Contact Measurement System With Electromagnets for Vibration Tests on Bladed Disks,” Applied Measurement Systems, M. Z. Haq, ed., InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, pp. 77–108, available at: http://www.intechopen.com/books/applied-measurement-systems/non-contact-measurement-system-with-electromagnets-for-vibration-tests-on-bladed-disks

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) The real CRT turbine stage. (b) The test article.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Detail of the attachment constraints: (a) free configuration, (b) tightened configuration, and (c) cross section of the test article

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Natural frequencies versus nodal diameters for the system outer ring sectors and base disk

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Campbell diagram, 1 F natural frequencies

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Ring with the magnets facing the test article

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

(a) 1 F, ND3 strain pattern and (b) strain gauge position

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

(a) Detail of the strain gauges and cables. (b) Detail of the antenna of the telemetry system.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Deformed shapes of the disk and response FFT: (a) free hooks and (b) constrained hooks

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Experimental Campbell diagram. Constrained hooks configuration. One exciting magnet.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Experimental Campbell diagrams, 21 magnets. (a) 3D free sector hooks. (b) 3D constrained sector hooks.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

EO = 21, ND = 3. Free hooks, FRF at different magnet gap values.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

EO = 21, ND = 3. Constrained hooks, FRF at different magnet gap values.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

EO = 21, ND = 3. Average FRF for the different magnet gap values, comparison of the FRF in the case of free and constrained configuration.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

ND3. Average maximum strain amplitude for different excitation force in the case of free and constrained hooks configuration.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Average maximum strain amplitude for different excitation force in the case of free and constrained hooks configuration, for different ND

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Normalized maximum FRF amplitude versus the amplitude of the excitation force

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In