Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Structures and Dynamics

Modeling of Flange Joints for the Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Gas Turbine Engine Casings

[+] Author and Article Information
C. W. Schwingshackl

Imperial College London,
London, United Kingdom
e-mail: c.schwingshackl@imperial.ac.uk

E. P. Petrov

University of Sussex,
Brighton, United Kingdom
e-mail: y.petrov@sussex.ac.uk

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received June 26, 2012; final manuscript received July 2, 2012; published online October 11, 2012. Editor: Dilip R. Ballal.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 134(12), 122504 (Oct 11, 2012) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4007342 History: Received June 26, 2012; Revised July 02, 2012

The finite element analysis of individual components of aircraft engine casings provides high accuracy and a good agreement with the measured response data. However, when these components are assembled, the accuracy of such predictions can significantly deteriorate since models describing stiffness and friction properties of joints are linearized. A full nonlinear analysis of the casing flanges is required to fully include the influence of the bolted joints, model the flexibility in the contact interface, and consider the nonlinear behavior of the contact due to partial slip and separation. In this paper different nonlinear models of casings are investigated with an available nonlinear analysis tool: A parametric study of the contact interface meshes is conducted to identify a satisfying analysis approach. The dynamic flange behavior is analyzed in detail, including effects of the bolt and normal load distribution. A comparison of the introduced nonlinear modeling with more traditional rigid or linear-elastic flange joint models is carried out to evaluate the effect of the nonlinear approach. The study demonstrates the nonlinear nature of a casing flange joint and highlights the need to include them in the analysis. The detailed modeling of the contact interaction of joints gives an insight in the nonlinear contact behavior of flanges of aircraft engine casings, and the predictive capabilities for the nonlinear analysis of gas turbine engines.

Copyright © 2012 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Firrone, C. M., Zucca, S., and Gola, M., 2009, “Effect of Static/Dynamic Coupling on the Forced Response of Turbine Bladed Disks With Underplatform Dampers,” Proc. of ASME Turbo Expo, Orlando, FL, June 8–12, ASME Paper No. GT2009-59905, pp. 429–440. [CrossRef]
Cigeroglu, E., An, N., and Menq, C. H., 2007, “Wedge Damper Modeling and Forced Response Prediction of Frictionally Constrained Blades,” Proc. of ASME Turbo Expo, Montreal, Canada, May 14–17, ASME Paper No. GT2007-27963, pp. 519–528. [CrossRef]
Petrov, E. P., 2008, “Explicit Finite Element Models of Friction Dampers in Forced Response Analysis of Bladed Disks,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 130(2), p. 022502. [CrossRef]
Charleux, D., Gibert, C., Thouverez, F., and Dupeux, J., 2006, “Numerical and Experimental Study of Friction Damping in Blade Attachments of Rotating Bladed Disks,” Int. J. Rotating Mach., Article ID 71302, pp. 1–13. [CrossRef]
Petrov, E. P., and Ewins, D. J., 2006, Effects of Damping and Varying Contact Area at Blade-Disc Joints in Forced Response Analysis of Bladed Disc Assemblies, ASME J. Turbomach., 128, pp. 403–410. [CrossRef]
Chen, J. J., and Menq, C. H., 2001, “Prediction of Periodic Response of Blades Having 3D Nonlinear Shroud Constraints,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 123, pp. 901–909. [CrossRef]
Petrov, E. P., 2004, “A Method for Use of Cyclic Symmetry Properties in Analysis of Nonlinear Multiharmonic Vibrations of Bladed Discs,” ASME J. Turbomach., 126, pp. 175–183. [CrossRef]
Luan, Y., Guan, Z., Cheng, G., and Liu, S., 2011, “A Simplified Nonlinear Dynamic Model for the Analysis of Pipe Structures With Bolted Flange Joints,” J. Sound Vib.331(2), pp. 325–344. [CrossRef]
Boeswald, M., and Link, M., 2003, “Experimental and Analytical Investigations of Non-Linear Cylindrical Casing Joints Using Base Excitation Testing,” Proceedings of International Modal Analysis Conference 2003, IMAC XXI, Kissimmee, FL, February 3–6.
Boeswald, M., and Link, M., 2004, “Identification of Non-Linear Joint Parameters by Using Frequency Response Residuals,” Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, ISMA, pp. 3121–3140.
Gaul, L., and Lenz, J., 1997, “Nonlinear Dynamics of Structures Assembled by Bolted Joints,” Acta Mech., 125(1-4), pp. 169–181. [CrossRef]
Ibrahim, R. A., and Pettit, C. L., 2003, “Uncertainties and Dynamic Problems of Bolted Joints and Other Fasteners,” J. Sound Vib., 279(3-5), pp. 857–936. [CrossRef]
Petrov, E. P., and Ewins, D. J., 2004, “Generic Friction Models for Time-Domain Vibration Analysis of Bladed Disks,” ASME J. Turbomach., 126(1), pp. 184–192. [CrossRef]
Schwingshackl, C. W., Petrov, E. P., and Ewins, D. J., 2011, “Measured and Estimated Friction Interface Parameters in a Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 28, pp. 574–584. [CrossRef]
Petrov, E. P., and Ewins, D. J., 2002, “Analytical Formulation of Friction Interface Elements for Analysis of Nonlinear Multiharmonic Vibrations of Bladed Discs,” ASME J. Turbomach., 125, pp. 364–371. [CrossRef]
Petrov, E. P., and Ewins, D. J., 2004, “State-of-the-Art Dynamic Analysis for Nonlinear Gas Turbine Structures,” J. Aerosp. Eng., Proc. IMechE, Part G, 218(G3), pp. 199–211. [CrossRef]
Petrov, E., 2011, “A High-Accuracy Model Reduction for Analysis of Nonlinear Vibrations in Structures With Contact Interfaces,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 133, p. 102503. [CrossRef]
Petrov, E. P., and Ewins, D. J., 2007, “Advanced Modelling of Underplatform Friction Dampers for Analysis of Bladed Disk Vibration,” ASME J. Turbomach., 129(1), pp. 143–150. [CrossRef]
Schwingshackl, C. W., Petrov, E. P., and Ewins, D. J., 2011, “Effects of Contact Interface Parameters on Vibration of Turbine Bladed Disks with Underplatform Dampers,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2011: Power for Land, Sea and Air, Vancouver, Canada, June 6–10, ASME Paper No. GT2011-45699, pp. 867–876. [CrossRef]
Shigley, J. E., 2001, Mechanical Engineering Design, 6th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Bickford, J. H., 1998, Handbook of Bolts and Bolted Joints, Dekker, New York.
Matek, W., Muhs, D., Wittel, H., and Becker, M., 1994, Roloff/Matek Maschinenelemente, 13th ed., Vieweg, Braunschweig, Germany.
Oskouei, R. H., Keikhosravy, M., and Soutis, C., 2009, “Estimating Clamping Pressure Distribution and Stiffness in Aircraft Bolted Joints by Finite-Element Analysis,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part G, 223(7), pp. 863–871. [CrossRef]
Kim, J., Yoon, J.-C., and Kang, B.-S., 2007, “Finite Element Analysis and Modeling of Structure With Bolted Joints,” Appl. Math. Model., 31(5), pp. 895–911. [CrossRef]
Williams, J. G., Anley, R. E., Nash, D. H., and Gray, T. G. F., 2009, “Analysis of Externally Loaded Bolted Joints: Analytical, Computational and Experimental Study,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 86(7), pp. 420–427. [CrossRef]
Schwingshackl, C. W., Petrov, E. P., and Ewins, D. J., 2010, “Validation of Test Rig Measurements and Prediction Tools for Friction Interface Modelling,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2010: Power for Land, Sea and Air, Glasgow, UK, June 14–18, ASME Paper No. GT2010-23274, pp. 1015–1024. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Application of bolt load with joint boundary and uniform pressure distribution

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Scheme of the forced response analysis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Finite element sector mode (a) flange sector with detail, (b) cyclic view of sector, and (c) bolt model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Different nonlinear node locations for 46–171 elements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Nonlinear model for the sector with bolt

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Flange FRF for different excitation levels and 2 and 4 ND

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Flange behavior for 4ND at 10 N excitation: (a) energy dissipation and (b) contact condition

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Different static normal stress distributions, (a) across the flange, (b) coarse mesh with joint boundary, and (c) fine mesh with joint boundary

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

2ND and 4ND modes for the rigidly connected sector model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Comparison between rigid, spring, nonlinear, and bolt model for 2ND at 1 N excitation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Resonance response for different normal load distributions and at different excitation loads

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Resonance response for different element numbers and nodal diameters

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Resonance response for different element numbers and nodal diameters (2ND and 4ND)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Sector model with bolt; frequency response at different excitation levels

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Flange behavior with bolt for 2ND at (a) 30 N and (b) 100 N excitation




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In