0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Turbomachinery

Effect of Flow Inclination on Wind Turbine Performance

[+] Author and Article Information
Christina Tsalicoglou

e-mail: ctsalico@student.ethz.ch

Sarah Barber

e-mail: barbers@lec.mavt.ethz.ch

Ndaona Chokani

e-mail: chokani@lec.mavt.ethz.ch

Reza S. Abhari

e-mail: abhari@lec.mavt.ethz.ch
Laboratory for Energy Conversion,
Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering,
ETH Zurich,
8092 Zurich, Switzerland

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received June 18, 2012; final manuscript received June 29, 2012; published online October 11, 2012. Editor: Dilip R. Ballal.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 134(12), 122601 (Oct 11, 2012) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4007323 History: Received June 18, 2012; Revised June 29, 2012

This work examines the effect of flow inclination on the performance of a stand-alone wind turbine and of wind turbines operating in the wakes of upstream turbines. The experimental portion of this work, which includes performance and flowfield measurements, is conducted in the ETH dynamically-scaled wind turbine test facility, with a wind turbine model that can be inclined relative to the incoming flow. The performance of the wind turbine is measured with an in-line torquemeter, and a 5-hole steady-state probe is used to detail the inflow and wake flow of the turbine. Measurements show that over a range of tip-speed ratios of 4–7.5, the power coefficient of a wind turbine with an incoming flow of 15 deg inclination decreases on average by 7% relative to the power coefficient of a wind turbine with a noninclined incoming flow. Flowfield measurements show that the wake of a turbine with an inclined incoming flow is deflected; the deflection angle is approximately 6 deg for an incoming flow with 15 deg inclination. The measured wake profiles are used as inflow profiles for a blade element momentum code in order to quantify the impact of flow inclination on the performance of downstream wind turbines. In comparison to the case without inclination in the incoming flow, the combined power output of two aligned turbines with incoming inclined flow decreases by 1%, showing that flow inclination in complex terrain does not significantly reduce the energy production.

Copyright © 2012 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2011, “International Energy Statistics,” http://www.eia.gov/
Global Wind Energy Council, 2010, “Global Wind Report,” http://www.gwec. net/
Hau, E., 2006, Wind Turbines: Fundamentals, Technologies, Application, Economics, 2nd ed., Springer, New York.
Winkelmeier, H., and Geistlinger, B., 2004, “Alpine Windharvest,” Alpine Windharvest Partnership Network, Austria, Tech. Report No. A/I-2/3.1./5.
Singh, A., Chokani, N., and Abhari, R. S., 2011, “Assessing Large-Scale, Economic Wind Energy Potential,” 7th PhD Seminar on Wind Energy in Europe, Delft, The Netherlands, Oct. 27-28.
Kocer, G., Mansour, M., Chokani, N., Abhari, R. S., and Müller, M., 2011, “Full-Scale Wind Turbine Near-Wake Measurements Using an Instrumented UAV,” J. Sol. Energy Eng., 133, p. 041011. [CrossRef]
Kress, C., Barber, S., Chokani, N., and Abhari, R. S., 2011, “Improved Modeling of Wakes: Experimental Study and Experimentally-Anchored Model,” Proceedings of the EWEA Offshore 2011 Conference, Amsterdam, November 29-December 1.
Jafari, S., Chokani, N., and Abhari, R. S., 2011, “Terrain Effects on Wind Flow: Simulations With an Immersed Boundary Method,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2011, ASME Paper No. GT2011-46240. [CrossRef]
Barber, S., Wang, Y., Jafari, S., Chokani, N., and Abhari, R. S., 2011, “The Impact of Ice Formation on Wind Turbine Performance and Aerodynamics,” J. Sol. Energy Eng., 133, p. 011007. [CrossRef]
Barber, S., Chokani, N., and Abhari, R. S., 2011, “Effect of Wake Flow Non-Uniformity on Wind Turbine Performance and Aerodynamics,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2011, ASME Paper No. GT2011-46230. [CrossRef]
Kress, C., 2011, “Development of a Wind Turbine Wake Model for Wind Farm Layout,” M.S. thesis, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jiménez, A., Crespo, A., and Migoya, E., 2010, “Application of a LES Technique to Characterize the Wake Deflection of a Wind Turbine in Yaw,” Wind Energy, 13, pp. 559–572. [CrossRef]
Rwigema, M. K., 2010, “Propeller Blade Element Momentum Theory With Vortex Wake Deflection,” Proceedings of the 27th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, Nice, France, September 19–24.
Clayton, B. R., and Filby, P., 1982, “Measured Effects of Oblique Flows and Change in Blade Pitch Angle on Performance and Wake Development of Model Wind Turbines,” Proceedings of the 4th BWEA Wind Energy Conference, 13, pp. 559–572.
Grant, I., Parkin, P., and Wang, X., 1997, “Optical Vortex Tracking Studies of a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine in Yaw Using Laser-Sheet, Flow Visualisation,” Exp. Fluids, 23, pp. 513–519. [CrossRef]
Manwell, J., McGowan, J., and Rogers, A., 2002, Wind Energy Explained: Theory Design and Application, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Kochman, E., 2011, “Effect of Shear Profile and Yaw Angle on Wind Turbine Performance,” ETH Zurich, Switzerland, LEC Internal Report.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Setup of the subscaled wind turbine test facility

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Geometry of the two turbines at LEC’s dynamically scaled wind turbine test facility (a) DT, used for performance measurements and (b) UT, used for flowfield measurements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Five-hole steady-state probe and coordinate system used for the flowfield measurements. Probe diameter 5 mm.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Measurement points for the full plane steady-state flowfield measurements, shown as filled circles over the rotor plane

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Two-turbine configuration in inclined flow. Either a turbine or the probe can be mounted at the position of the downstream turbine.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

cp versus tip-speed ratio curve for (a) turbulence intensity TI=0% and (b) turbulence intensity TI=2.5%

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison of the power yield in yaw and in inclination

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Velocities at the centerline downstream of the DT as a function of x/D, for γ=0 deg and 15 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Side view schematic of the wake expansion and the deflection due to flow inclination at angle γ. The rotor and tower are shown to be at x/D=0.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Contours of axial velocities downstream of the turbine (flow inclination γ=15 deg) at (a) x=3D and (b) x=6D. The velocities are normalized with respect to the freestream axial velocity.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Contours of yaw angles (flow inclination γ=15 deg) at (a) x=3D and (b) x=6D

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

In-plane velocity vectors superimposed on contours of the in-plane velocity. The freestream flow inclination angle (γ=15 deg) is subtracted in the determination of the in-plane velocity vectors. The contours of the in-plane velocities are normalized magnitudes, |uin-plane|/uref.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

In-plane velocity vectors superimposed on contours of in-plane velocity at x=6.5D. The in-plane velocities are normalized magnitudes |uin-plane|/uref. The flow inclination is zero degrees (γ=0 deg).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Power yield versus inclination angle γ

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Power loss components for one turbine in different cases, termed as in Table 3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Estimated combined power yield of n aligned wind turbines on 0 deg and 15 deg slopes

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In