0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Microturbines and Small Turbomachinery

Evaluation of the Energy Performance of an Organic Rankine Cycle-Based Micro Combined Heat and Power System Involving a Hermetic Scroll Expander

[+] Author and Article Information
Jean-François Oudkerk

e-mail: jfoudkerk@ulg.ac.be

Ludovic Guillaume

Thermodynamics Laboratory,
University of Liège,
Campus du Sart-Tilman, B-49,
B-4000 Liège, Belgium

Eric Winandy

Emerson Climate Technologies GmbH,
Pascalstrasse 65,
52076 Aachen Germany

Vincent Lemort

Thermodynamics Laboratory,
University of Liège,
Campus du Sart-Tilman, B-49,
B-4000 Liège, Belgium

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power. Manuscript received February 29, 2012; final manuscript received October 11, 2012; published online March 18, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Paolo Chiesa.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 135(4), 042306 (Mar 18, 2013) (10 pages) Paper No: GTP-12-1056; doi: 10.1115/1.4023116 History: Received February 29, 2012; Revised October 11, 2012

This paper evaluates the performance of an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) based micro- combined heat and power (CHP) unit using a scroll expander. The considered system consists of a fuel boiler coupled with an ORC engine. As a preliminary step, the results of an experimental campaign and the modeling of a hermetic, lubricated scroll compressor used as an expander are presented. Then, a fluid comparison based on several criteria is conducted, leading to the selection of R245fa as working fluid for the ORC. A simulation model is then built to evaluate the performance of the system. The model associates an ORC model and a boiler model, both experimentally validated. This model is used to optimize and size the system. The optimization is performed considering two degrees of freedom: the evaporating temperature and the heat transfer fluid (HTF) mass flow rate. Seasonal simulation is finally performed with a bin method according to the standard PrEN14825 for an average European climate and for four heat emitter heating curves. Simulation results show that the electrical efficiency of the system varies from 6.35% for hot water at 65 °C (high temperature application) to 8.6% for a hot water temperature of 22 °C (low temperature application). Over one entire year, the system exhibits an overall electrical efficiency of about 8% and an overall thermal efficiency around 87% without significant difference between the four heat emitter heating curves. Finally, some improvements of the scroll expander are evaluated. It is shown that by increasing the maximum inlet temperature (limited to 140 °C due to technical reasons) and using two scroll expanders in series, the overall electrical efficiency reaches 12.5%.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Evolution of the overall isentropic effectiveness with the pressure ratio imposed to the expander

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Efficiency of the generator and CVexp versus shaft power for a typical scroll expander

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Contribution of electromechanical and under- or overexpansion losses

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Configuration of ORC-based CHP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Evolution of the cycle net efficiency with the evaporating temperature for different fluids (Tcd = 50 °C)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Volume ratio in term of Tev for different fluids (Tcd = 50 °C)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Evolution of the volume coefficient with the evaporating temperature for different fluids (Tcd = 50 °C)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Influence of Tev on the electrical efficiency

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Temperature profile in the evaporator

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Average climate (PrEN14825)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Heat emitters heating curves

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Electrical efficiency for each bin in term of outdoor temperature for four heat emitter heating curves (very high, high, medium, and low temperature application)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Net ORC efficiency versus Tev with actual scroll expander (Tcd = 50 °C)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Isentropic effectiveness of the actual scroll expander in terms of Tev for different fluid (Tcd = 50 °C)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Improvement of the isentropic effectiveness for toluene and n-pentane (Tcd = 50 °C)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

ORC net efficiency with improvement for toluene and n-pentane (Tcd = 50 °C)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In