0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Structures and Dynamics

Scavenge Flow in a Bearing Chamber With Tangential Sump Off-Take

[+] Author and Article Information
Budi Chandra

University Technology Centre for Gas Turbine,
Transmission Systems,
University of Nottingham,
University Park,
Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK

Steven H. Collicott

School of Aeronautics and Astronautics,
Purdue University,
West Lafayette, IN 47907-2045

John H. Munson

Rolls-Royce Corporation,
Indianapolis, IN 46206

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received August 15, 2012; final manuscript received October 8, 2012; published online February 21, 2013. Editor: Dilip R. Ballal.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 135(3), 032503 (Feb 21, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: GTP-12-1332; doi: 10.1115/1.4007869 History: Received August 15, 2012; Revised October 08, 2012

A tangential sump design is employed in several aero-engines mainly due to its simplicity and compactness. However various problems have prompted investigations of the sump design. An experimental program at Purdue University (Chandra, 2006, “Flows in Turbine Engine Oil Sumps,” Ph.D. thesis, School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Purdue University and Radocaj, 2001, “Experimental Characterization of a Simple Gas Turbine Engine Sump Geometry,” M.S. thesis, School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Purdue University) was conducted to investigate the characteristics of a tangential sump design like one used in the AE3007 aero-engine. The research employed a transparent chamber to allow unprecedented view of the flow inside the bearing chamber. It was quickly found that a persistent liquid pooling near the drain entrance of a tangential sump obstructs the outflow to the scavenge pump. The air flow near the drain entrance has been shown to have strong reverse flow, even with, or perhaps due to, substantial over-scavenging. Various modifications were tested with varying degrees of success. The work highlights limitations of a tangential sump design. Based on the lessons learned, a new sump design was proposed. Preliminary test of the new sump design has shown positive results.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Axial diagram of gas turbine bearing chamber

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Center sump of Rolls-Royce AE3007 engine

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Bearing chamber with a tangential off-take sump

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Schematic of the closed-loop experimental rig

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The sump construction consisting of a center plate and two endplates

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Shaft and seal runner location in the chamber

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Injector assembly and placement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Flow patterns of tangential off-take sump (Ql = 0.3 gpm, gravity drain)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Typical streamlines around a sharp and a rounded sump lip [12]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Rounded drain lip attachment

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

A sample case of an oil smearing experiment

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Computational result for streamlines around the drain entrance [12]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

A sample case of flow visualization using tufts

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Vortices on boundary layers of sump walls

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Streamlines of undersized, matched, and oversized sump [12]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Lip attachments with various effective sump heights

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Schematic of the experimental rig with three solenoid valves for residence volume measurements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Residence volume for sump height of 0.25 inches

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Residence volume for sump height of 0.20 inches

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Residence volume for sump height of 0.15 inches

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Residence volume for sump height of 0.10 inches

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

Residence volume for sump height of 0.05 inches

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

A new center plate for the advanced sump design (shaft rotation is anti-clockwise)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 24

Advanced sump at oil flow rate, Ql, of 0.3 gpm and SR ≈ 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 25

Residence volume comparison between the original and advanced Indy sump (AE3007)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In