Research Papers: Internal Combustion Engines

Combustion Phasing Effect on Cycle Efficiency of a Diesel Engine Using Advanced Gasoline Fumigation

[+] Author and Article Information
Bin Huang

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Minnesota,
Minneapolis, MN 55455

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the IC Engine Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power. Manuscript received August 13, 2012; final manuscript received August 14, 2012; published online February 21, 2013. Editor: Dilip R. Ballal.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 135(3), 032801 (Feb 21, 2013) (6 pages) Paper No: GTP-12-1330; doi: 10.1115/1.4007757 History: Received August 13, 2012; Revised August 14, 2012

Advanced premixed compression ignition (CI) combustion using fumigation has been shown to yield significant improvements in indicated efficiency over traditional diesel combustion strategies while simultaneously reducing engine-out soot and NOx emissions. To better interpret these findings, a breakdown of the ways in which actual performance deviates from ideal engine cycles is helpful. Nonideal combustion phasing is one cause of such deviations. In this paper, the centroid of the calculated apparent heat release rate is used to estimate an adjusted maximum possible thermal efficiency based on constant volume combustion using an effective compression ratio concept. Using these metrics, experimental engine data are evaluated from a single cylinder direct-injection diesel engine operating in premixed CI mode enabled by gasoline fumigation and a diesel pilot injection. Indicated gross cycle efficiency was found to be higher for premixed fumigation compared with a conventional diesel condition at the same load. A key finding of the work is that the peak indicated cycle efficiency for fumigated premixed CI combustion occurs with combustion phased very close to top dead center. Shorter heat release duration and lower heat losses from the cylinder are thought to be the cause of differences in cycle efficiency between conventional combustion and premixed CI fumigation modes.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Dec, J., 2009, “Advanced Compression-Ignition Engines—Understanding the In-Cylinder Processes,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 32, pp. 2727–2742. [CrossRef]
Ickes, A. M., Assanis, D. N., and Bohac, S. V., 2009, “Load Limits With Fuel Effects of a Premixed Diesel Combustion Mode,” SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-1972. [CrossRef]
Lu, Y.Yu, W., and Su, W., 2011, “Using Multiple Injection Strategies in Diesel PCCI Combustion: Potential to Extend Engine Load, Improve Trade-Off of Emissions and Efficiency,” SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-1396. [CrossRef]
Hanson, R. M., Kokjohn, S. L., Splitter, D. A., and Reitz, R. D., 2010, “An Experimental Investigation of Fuel Reactivity Controlled PCCI Combustion in a Heavy-Duty Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-0864. [CrossRef]
S. Kokjohn, S., Hanson, R., Splitter, D., Kaddatz, J., and Reitz, R., 2011, “Fuel Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition (RCCI) Combustion in Light- and Heavy-Duty Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-0357. [CrossRef]
Splitter, D., Hanson, R., Kokjohn, S., and Reitz, R., 2011, “Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition (RCCI) Heavy-Duty Engine Operation at Mid- and High-Loads With Conventional and Alternative Fuels,” SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-0363. [CrossRef]
Kokjohn, S. L., Hanson, R. M., Splitter, D. A., and Reitz, R. D., 2011, “Fuel Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition (RCCI): A Pathway to Controlled High-Efficiency Clean Combustion,” Int. J. Eng. Res., 12, pp. 209–226. [CrossRef]
Van Overbeke, C. W., 1942, “Mainfold Introduction of Hydrocarbons as an Aid for Starting,” Ph.D thesis, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA.
Alperstein, M., Swim, W. B., and Schweitzer, P. H., 1958, “Fumigation Kills Diesel Smoke and Improves Performance,” SAE Trans., 66, pp. 574–588. [CrossRef]
Ohkishi., M., Kuboto., K., Hosogai, D., Nishimura, J., and Kobayashi, T., 1992, “Diesel Smoke Reduction by Gasoline Fumigation Using an Ultrasonic Atomizer,” SAE Technical Paper 920691. [CrossRef]
C. F.Taylor, 1960, The Internal Combustion Engine in Theory and Practice, 2nd ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Heywood, J., 1988, Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Kook, S., Bae, C., Miles, P., Choi, D., and Pickett, L., 2005, “The Influence of Charge Dilution and Injection Timing on Low-Temperature Diesel Combustion and Emissions,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-3837. [CrossRef]
Petersen, B. R., Ekoto, I., and Miles, P., 2010, “An Investigation into the Effects of Fuel Properties and Engine Load on the UHC and CO Emissions From a Light-Duty Optical Diesel Engine Operating in a Partially Premixed Combustion Regime,” SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-1470. [CrossRef]
Jacobs, T. J., and Assanis, D. N., 2007, “The Attainment of Premixed Compression Ignition Low-Temperature Combustion in a Compression Ignition Direct Injection Engine,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 31, pp. 2913–2920. [CrossRef]
Curran, S., Prokhodko, V., Cho, K., Sluder, C., Parks, J., Wagner, R., Kokjohn, S., and Reitz, R., 2010, “In-Cylinder Fuel Blending of Gasoline/Diesel for Improved Efficiency and Lowest Possible Emissions on a Multi-Cylinder Light Duty Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-2206. [CrossRef]
Wiedenhoefer, J. F., and Reitz, R., 2003, “Multidimensional Modeling of the Effects of Radiation and Soot Deposition in Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0560. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Plot of ideal closed Otto cycle with constant volume combustion occurring at TDC, 10 deg BTDC and 10 deg ATDC

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Centroid of heat release versus diesel injection timing for F-1 and F-2 operating conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Cylinder pressure and gross apparent rate of heat release for F-1 and D-1 operating conditions at 20 deg BTDC commanded diesel injection timing

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Gross apparent rate of heat release for F-1 and F-2 operating conditions at 20, 40 and 60 deg BTDC commanded injection timing

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Gross indicated specific NOx and soot for F-1 and F-2 operating conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Gross indicated cycle efficiency versus diesel injection timing for F-1, F-2 and D-1 operating conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Gross indicated cycle efficiency versus the centroid of heat release for the F-1 and D-1 operating conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Gross indicated cycle efficiency versus effective compression ratio for F-1, F-2 and D-1 operating conditions showing peak Otto cycle efficiency with constant γ = 1.3




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In