0
Research Papers: Nuclear Power

Mechanism of Upward Fuel Discharge During Core Disruptive Accidents in Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactors

[+] Author and Article Information
Ken-ichi Matsuba

e-mail: matsuba.kennichi@jaea.go.jp

Mikio Isozaki

e-mail: isozaki.mikio@jaea.go.jp

Kenji Kamiyama

e-mail: kamiyama.kenji@jaea.go.jp

Yoshiharu Tobita

e-mail: tobita.yoshiharu@jaea.go.jp
Advanced Nuclear System Research
and Development Directorate,
Japan Atomic Energy Agency,
Oarai, Ibaraki, 311-1393, Japan

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Nuclear Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power. Manuscript received September 12, 2012; final manuscript received September 19, 2012; published online February 21, 2013. Editor: Dilip R. Ballal.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 135(3), 032901 (Feb 21, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: GTP-12-1355; doi: 10.1115/1.4007870 History: Received September 12, 2012; Revised September 19, 2012

The elimination of severe power excursion during core disruptive accidents is a key issue for the enhanced safety of sodium-cooled fast reactors. In order to prevent the formation of a large-scale molten fuel pool within a reactor core, which is one of the factors leading to the severe power excursion, the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) is considering the introduction of fuel assembly with inner duct structure (FAIDUS). In the current reference design for FAIDUS, the top end of the inner duct is open, whereas the bottom end is closed, and therefore it is expected that the molten fuel will be discharged from the reactor core towards the upper sodium plenum through the inner duct. The objective of the present study is to clarify the fundamental mechanism for upward fuel discharge through the inner duct structure, and thereby to confirm the effectiveness of FAIDUS. The possibility of upward discharge of a high-density melt driven by coolant vapor has been confirmed by the JAEA's experiment, in which molten Wood's metal simulating the molten fuel was injected into a coolant channel (equivalent inner diameter: 30 mm, total height: 2 m, fluid content: water) simulating the inner duct structure. In this paper, the mechanism of upward discharge of a high-density melt driven by coolant vapor pressure and/or flow in this experiment is discussed in terms of the application to reactor conditions. Through this discussion, the following mechanisms were clarified. (1) Coolant vapor pressure is built up within the coolant channel after the melt injection. The magnitude of the pressure buildup becomes larger with the increase of melt-enthalpy-injection rate, which is defined by the product of melt-mass-injection rate into the coolant channel and melt specific enthalpy. (2) Following the pressure buildup, the melt is discharged upward, being driven by the coolant vapor flow directing towards the top opening end of the coolant channel. The upward discharge mass rate becomes higher with the increase of the magnitude of the pressure buildup and, therefore, the melt-enthalpy-injection rate. The experimental knowledge obtained from the JAEA's experiment suggests that the coolant pressure buildup could act as one of the driving forces for the upward discharge of a high-density melt through the inner duct structure in FAIDUS under reactor conditions with higher melt-enthalpy-injection rate than the current simulant experimental condition.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Kondo, Sa., Nonaka, N., Niwa, H., Sato, I., Furutani, A., and Miyake, O., 1990, “Integrated Analysis of In-Vessel and Ex-Vessel Severe-Accident Sequences,” Proceedings of the 1990 International Fast Reactor Safety Meeting, Snowbird, UT, August 12–16, Vol. 4, pp. 1–12.
Sato, I., Tobita, Y., Konishi, K., Kamiyama, K., Toyooka, J., Nakai, R., Kubo, S., Kotake, S., Koyama, K., Vassiliev, Y., Vurim, A., Zuev, V., and Kolodeshnikov, A., 2011, “Safety Strategy of JSFR Eliminating Severe Recriticality Events and Establishing In-Vessel Retention in the Core Disruptive Accident,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 48(4), pp. 556–566. [CrossRef]
Hishida, M., Kubo, S., Konomura, M., and Toda, M., 2007, “Progress on the Plant Design Concept of Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 44(3), pp. 303–308. [CrossRef]
Konishi, K., Kubo, S., Konomura, M., Sato, I., Koyama, K., Toyooka, J., Kamiyama, K., Kotake, S., Vurim, A. D., Gaidaichuk, V. A., Pakhnits, A. V., and Vassiliev, Y. S., 2006, “The Eagle Project to Eliminate the Recriticality Issue of Fast Reactors; Progress and Results of In-Pile Tests,” Proceedings of the 5th Korea–Japan Symposium on Nuclear Thermal Hydraulics and Safety (NTHAS5), Jeju, Korea, November 26–29, pp. 465–471.
Matsuba, K., Isozaki, M., Kamiyama, K., and Tobita, Y., 2011, “Experimental Study on Upward Fuel Discharge During Core Disruptive Accident in JSFR: Results of an Out-of-Pile Experiment With Visual Observation,” Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE-19), Osaka, Japan, October 24–25, Paper No. ICONE19-43993.
Onoda, Y., Fukano, Y., Sato, I., Marquie, C., and Duc, B., 2011, “Three-Pin Cluster CABRI Tests Simulating the Unprotected Loss-of-Flow Accident in Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactors,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 48(2), pp. 188–204. [CrossRef]
Matsuba, K., Imahori, S., and Isozaki, M., 2004, “Experimental Study on Void Development Behavior in a Simulated Coolant Channel,” Proceedings of the 6th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics, Nara, Japan, October 4–8, Paper No. N6P077.
Spencer, B. W., Wilson, R. J., Vetter, D. L., Erickson, E. G., and Dewey, G., 1985, “Results of Recent Reactor-Material Tests on Dispersal of Oxide Fuel from a Disrupted Core,” Proceedings of the International Topical Meeting on Fast Reactor Safety, Vol. 2, Knoxville, TN, April 21–25, pp. 877–882.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Concept of fuel assembly with inner duct structure (FAIDUS) which is studied for an advanced loop-type fast reactor named JSFR (Japan sodium-cooled fast reactor)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

ULOF scenario for JSFR

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Suggested mechanism of upward melt discharge mainly driven by coolant vapor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Overall schematic view of the experimental apparatus

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Visual images of the upward melt discharge observed in the No. 5 test

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Melt injection rate and coolant pressure buildup measured in the No. 5 experiment

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Photograph of the melt discharged into the upper plenum after the No. 5 test

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Comparison of the measured pressure transients in the coolant channel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparison of the mass fractions of the upward melt discharge amount to the total amount of the injected melt

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Composite bar chart of the mass fraction of the upward melt discharge amount

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Comparison of the variations of the coolant void volume in the coolant channel

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In