0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Aircraft Engine

Effects of Scalloping on the Mixing Mechanisms of Forced Mixers With Highly Swirling Core Flow

[+] Author and Article Information
Ali Mahallati

e-mail: ali.mahallati@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
Gas Turbines, Aerospace, National Research Council of Canada,
Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada

Mark Cunningham

Installation and Turbine Aerodynamics,
Pratt & Whitney Canada,
Longueuil,
QCJ4G 1A1, Canada

Julio Militzer

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Dalhousie University,
Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power. Manuscript received October 8, 2012; final manuscript received November 26, 2012; published online June 10, 2013. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 135(7), 071202 (Jun 10, 2013) (10 pages) Paper No: GTP-12-1397; doi: 10.1115/1.4024043 History: Received October 08, 2012; Revised November 26, 2012

This paper presents a detailed experimental and computational investigation of the effects of scalloping on the mixing mechanisms of a scaled 12-lobe turbofan mixer. Scalloping was achieved by eliminating approximately 70% of the lobe sidewall area. Measurements were made downstream of the mixer in a co-annular wind tunnel, and the simulations were carried out using an unstructured Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) solver, Numeca FINE/Hexa, with k-ω SST model. In the core flow, the swirl angle was varied from 0deg to 30deg. At high swirl angles, a three-dimensional separation bubble was formed on the lobe's suction surface penetration region and resulted in the generation of a vortex at the lobe valley. The valley vortex quickly dissipated downstream. The mixer lobes removed most of the swirl, but scalloped lobes removed less swirl in the region of the scalloped notch. The residual swirl downstream of the scalloped mixer interacted with the vortices and improved mixing rates compared to the unscalloped mixer. Core flow swirl up to 10deg provided improved mixing rates and reduced pressure and thrust losses for both mixers. As core flow swirl increased beyond 10deg, the mixing rate continued to improve, but pressure and thrust losses declined compared to the zero swirl case. Lobe scalloping, in high swirl conditions, resulted in better mixing and improved pressure loss over the unscalloped mixer but at the expense of reduced thrust.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Paterson, R. W., 1984, “Turbofan Mixer Nozzle Flow Field—Benchmark Experimental Study,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 106, pp. 692–6981. [CrossRef]
Waitz, I. A., Qiu, Y. J., Manning, T. A., Fung, A. K. S., Elliot, J. K., Kerwin, J. M., Krasnodebske, J. K., O'Sullivan, M. N., Tew, D. E., Greitzer, E. M., Marble, F. E., Tan, C. S., and Tillman, T. G., 1997, “Enhanced Mixing With Streamwise Vorticity,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 33, pp. 323–351. [CrossRef]
McCormick, D. C., and Bennett, J. C. J., 1994, “Vortical and Turbulent Structure of a Lobed Mixer Free Shear Layer,” AIAA J., 32, pp. 1852–1859. [CrossRef]
Yu, S. C. M., Yeo, J. H., and Teh, J. K. L., 1995, “Velocity Measurements Downstream of Lobed Forced Mixers With Different Convoluted Trailing Edge Configurations,” J. Propul. Power, 13, pp. 87–97. [CrossRef]
Yu, S. C. M., Yu, X. G., and Yip, T. H., 1996, “Effects of Initial Boundary Layer Thickness to the Lobed Forced Mixer Trailing Streamwise Vorticity,” J. Propul. Power, 12, pp. 440–442. [CrossRef]
Yu, S. C. M., and Yip, T. H., 1997, “Experimental Investigation of Two-Stream Mixing Flows With Streamwise and Normal Vorticity,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 18, pp. 253–261. [CrossRef]
Hu, H., Saga, T., and Kobayashi, T., 2005, “Dual-Plane Stereoscopic PIV Measurements in a Lobed Jet Mixing Flow,” Proceedings of the 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV, January 10–13, AIAA Paper No. 2005-443. [CrossRef]
Kuchar, A. P., and Chamberlin, R., 1980 “Scale Model Performance Test Investigation of Exhaust System Mixers for an Energy Efficient Engine (E3) Propulsion System,” Proceedings of the 18th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Pasadena, CA, January 14–16, AIAA Paper No. 80-0229. [CrossRef]
Kozlowski, H., and Larkin, M., 1981, “Energy Efficient Engine: Exhaust Mixer Model Technology Report,” NASA, Report No. CR-165459.
Tanna, H. K., 1973, “On the Effect of Swirling Motion of Sources on Subsonic Jet Noise,” J. Sound Vib., 29, pp. 281–293. [CrossRef]
Presz, W. M., Reynolds, G., and McCormick, D., 1994, “Thrust Augmentation Using Mixer-Ejector-Diffuser Systems,” Proceedings of the 32nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV, January 10–13, AIAA Paper No. 94-0020. [CrossRef]
Yu, S. C. M., Yip, T. H., and Liu, C. Y., 1997, “The Mixing Characteristics of Forced Mixers With Scalloped Lobes,” J. Propul. Power, 13, pp. 305–311. [CrossRef]
Yu, S. C. M., Hou, Y., and Chan, W. K., 2000., “Scarfing and Scalloping Effects on Lobed Forced Mixer at Low-Speed Conditions,” J. Propul. Power, 16, pp. 440–448. [CrossRef]
Mao, R., Yu, S. C. M., Zhou, T., and Chua, L. P., 2009, “On the Vorticity Characteristics of Lobe-Forced Mixer at Different Configurations,” Exp. Fluids, 46, pp. 1049–1066. [CrossRef]
Lei, J., Mahallati, A., Cunningham, M., and Germain, P., 2012, “Effects of Core Flow Swirl on Flow Characteristics of a Scalloped Lobed Force Mixer,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134, p. 111201. [CrossRef]
Lei, Z., Mahallati, A., Yang, H., Cunningham, M., and Germain, P., 2011, “Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Highly Swirling Flows in a Model Turbofan Lobed Mixer,” Proceedings of the 20th International Society for Airbreathing Engines (ISABE 2011), Gothenburg, Sweden, September 12–16, Paper No. ISABE-2011-1822.
Koutmos, P., and McGuirk, J. J., 1989, “Turbofan Forced Mixer/Nozzle Temperature and Flow Field Modelling,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 32, pp. 1141–1153. [CrossRef]
O'Sullivan, M. N., Krasnodebski, J. K., Waitz, I. A., Greitzer, E. M., Tan, C. S., and Dawes, W. N., 1996, “Computational Study of Viscous Effects on Lobed Mixer Flow Features and Performance,” J. Propul. Power, 12, pp. 449–456. [CrossRef]
Tester, B. J., Fisher, M. J., and Dalton, W. N., 2004, “A Contribution to the Understanding and Prediction of Jet Noise Generation in Forced Mixers,” Proceedings of the 10th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Manchester, UK, May 10–12, AIAA Paper No. 2004-2897. [CrossRef]
Manning, T. A., 1991, “Experimental Studies of Mixing Flows With Streamwise Vorticity,” M.S. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Menter, F. R., Kuntz, M., and Langtry, R., 2003, “Ten Years of Industrial Experience With the SST Turbulence Model,” Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer, Antalya, Turkey, October 12–17, Vol. 4, K. Hanjalić, Y.Nagano, and M.Tummers, eds., Begell House Inc., Redding, CT, pp. 625–632.
Gregory-Smith, D. G., Graves, C. P., and Walsh, J. A., 1988, “Growth of Secondary Losses and Vorticity in an Axial Turbine Cascade,” ASME J. Turbomach., 110, pp. 1–8. [CrossRef]
Escudier, M. P., and Keller, J. J., 1985, “Recirculation in Swirling Flow: A Manifestation of Vortex Breakdown,” AIAA J., 23, pp. 111–116. [CrossRef]
Sheen, H. J., Chen, W. J., and Jeng, S. Y., 1996, “Recirculation Zones of Unconfined and Confined Annular Swirling Jets,” AIAA J., 34, pp. 572–579. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Cutaway of the test section

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Lobed mixer geometry

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Computational mesh

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Experimentally measured flowfields downstream of the mixers at baseline

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Axial decay of streamwise circulation at baseline

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Radial distribution of swirl angle at the x/Dh = 0.07 plane for 10 deg and 30 deg swirl cases

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

CFD predicted static pressure distribution and surface oil-flow visualization on the core surface of lobe valley

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Experimentally measured flowfields downstream of the mixers at 30 deg swirl

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

CFD predicted streamwise vorticity fields with 30 deg inlet swirl

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

CFD predicted streamwise vorticity field at the mixer valley trailing edge

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Streamwise circulation at the x/Dh = 0.07 plane

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

CCW streamwise circulation downstream of the mixers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

CFD predicted normalized turbulent kinetic energy at 30 deg swirl

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Static pressure mixing index

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Total pressure and thrust loss of the mixers

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In