0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions

Flame Structure and Combustion Capability of Non-Premixed Rifled Nozzles

[+] Author and Article Information
Kuo C. San

Department of Aircraft Engineering,
Air Force Institute of Technology,
Kaohsiung, Taiwan 820, China
e-mail: d90543001@ntu.edu.tw

Shun C. Yen

Department of Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering,
National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung,
Taiwan 202, China

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power. Manuscript received August 10, 2012; final manuscript received October 27, 2012; published online June 10, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Joseph Zelina.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 135(7), 071501 (Jun 10, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: GTP-12-1325; doi: 10.1115/1.4024060 History: Received August 10, 2012; Revised October 27, 2012

The target of this study is to promote combustion capability using a novel rifled nozzle which was set at the outlet of a conventional (unrifled) combustor. The rifled nozzle was utilized to adjust the flow swirling intensity behind the traditional combustor by changing the number of rifles. The rifle mechanism enhances the turbulence intensity and increases the mixing efficiency between the central-fuel jet and the annular swirled air-jet by modifying the momentum transmission. Specifically, direct photography, Schlieren photography, thermocouples, and a gas analyzer were utilized to document the flame behavior, peak temperature, temperature distribution, combustion capability, and gas-concentration distribution. The experimental results confirm that increasing the number of rifles and the annular swirling air-jet velocity (ua) improves the combustion capability. Five characteristic flame modes—jet-flame, flickering-flame, recirculated-flame, ring-flame and lifted-flame—were obtained using various annular air-jet and central fuel-jet velocities. The total combustion capability (Qtot) increases with the number of rifles and with increasing ua. The Qtot of a 12-rifled nozzle (swirling number (S) = 0.5119) is about 33% higher than that of an unrifled nozzle. In addition, the high swirling intensity induces the low nitric oxide (NO) concentration, and the maximum concentration of NO behind the 12-rifled nozzle (S = 0.5119) is 49% lower than that behind the unrifled nozzle.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Gupta, A. K., Lilley, D. G., and Syred, N., 1984, Swirl Flow, Abacus Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 1–293.
Rose, W. G., 1962, “A Swirling Round Turbulent Jet 1-Mean-Flow Measurements,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 29, pp. 615–625. [CrossRef]
Chigier, N. A., and Beer, J. M., 1964, “Velocity and Static Pressure Distributions in Swirling Air Jets Issuing from Annular and Divergent Nozzles,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 86, pp. 788–798. [CrossRef]
Davies, T. W., and Beer, J. M., 1971, “Flow in the Wake of Bluff-Body Flame Stabilizers,” Proceedings of the Thirteenth Symposium (International) on Combustion, Salt Lake City, UT, August 23–29, 1970, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 631–638. [CrossRef]
Chen, Y. C., Cheng, C. C., Pan, K. L., and Yang, J. T., 1998, “Flame Lift-Off and Stabilization Mechanisms of Nonpremixed Jet Flame on a Bluff-Body Burner,” Combust. Flame, 115, pp. 51–65. [CrossRef]
Huang, R. F., and Lin, C. L., 1994, “Characteristic Modes and Thermal Structure of Nonpremixed Circular-Disc Stabilized Flames,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 100, pp. 123–139. [CrossRef]
Roquemore, W. M., Tankin, R. S., Chiu, H. H., and Lottes, S. A., 1986, “A Study of a Bluff-Body Combustor Using Laser Sheet Lighting,” Exp. Fluids, 4, pp. 205–213. [CrossRef]
Marsri, A. R., and Bilger, R. W., 1984, “Turbulent Diffusion Flame of Hydrocarbon Fuel Stabilized on a Bluff Body,” Proceedings of the Twentieth Symposium (International) on Combustion, Ann Arbor, MI, August 12–17, The Combustion Institute, pp. 319–326. [CrossRef]
Li, X., and Takin, R. S., 1987, “A Study of Cold and Combusting Flow Around Bluff-Body Combustors,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 52, pp. 173–206. [CrossRef]
Schefer, R. W., Namazian, M., and Kelly, J., 1994, “Velocity Measurement in Turbulent Bluff-Body Stabilized Flows,” AIAA J., 32, pp. 1844–1851. [CrossRef]
Görtler, H., 1954, “Decay of Swirl in an Axially Symmetrical Jet Far From the Orifice,” Rev. Mat. Hisp.-Am., 14(4), pp. 143–178.
Hartnett, J. P., and Eckert, E. R. G., 1957, “Experiment Study of the Velocity and Temperature Distribution in a High Velocity Vortex Type Flow,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 79, pp. 751–757.
Lay, J. E., 1959, “An Experiment and Analytical Study of the Vortex-Flow Temperature Separation by Position of Spiral and Axial Flows,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 81, pp. 202–212.
Chigier, N. A., and Chervinsky, A., 1967, “Experimental Investigation of Swirling Vortex Motions in Jets,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 89, pp. 443–451. [CrossRef]
Kerr, N. M., and Fraser, D., 1965, “Swirl Part 1: Effect on Axisymmetrical Turbulent Jets,” J. Institute Fuel, 38, pp. 519–526.
Cheng, T. S., Chao, Y. C., Wu, D. C., Yuan, T., Lu, C. C., Cheng, C. K., and Chang, J. M., 1998, “Effects of Fuel-Air Mixing on Flame Structures and NOx Emissions in Swirling Methane Jet Flames,” Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Symposium (International) on Combustion, Boulder, CO, August 2–7, The Combustion Institute, pp. 1229–1237.
Chervinsky, A., 1969, “Turbulent Swirling Jet Diffusion Flames,” AIAA J., 7(10), pp. 1877–1883. [CrossRef]
Chen, R. H., and Driscoll, J. F., 1988, “The Role of the Recirculation Vortex in Improving Fule-Air Mixing Within Swirling Flames,” Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Symposium (International) on Combustion, Seattle, WA, August 14–19, The Combustion Institute, pp. 531–540.
Morcos, V. H., and Abdel-Rahim, Y. M., 1999, “Parametric Study of Flame Length Characteristics in Straight and Swirl Light-Fuel Oil Burners,” Fuel, 78(8), pp. 979–985. [CrossRef]
Huang, R. F., and Yen, S. C., 2008, “Aerodynamic Characteristics and Thermal Structure of Nonpremixed Reacting Swirling Wakes at Low Reynolds Numbers” Combust. Flame, 155(4), pp. 539–556. [CrossRef]
San, K. C., and Hsu, H. J., 2009, “Characteristics of Flow and Flame Behavior Behind Rifled/Unrifled Nozzles,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 131, p. 051501. [CrossRef]
Huang, R. F., and Tsai, F. C., 2001, “Observations of Swirling Flows Behind Circular Discs,” AIAA J., 39(6), pp. 1106–1112. [CrossRef]
Yen, S. C., 2003, “Flow Control and Flame Manipulation of Swirling Jets Using a Dual-Disc Blockage Configuration,” Ph.D. thesis, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 63–65.
Cengel, Y. A., and Boles, M. A., 1998, Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Variations of swirl number (S) against the annular-jet velocity (ua)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Photographs of flame configurations for a unrifled nozzle at (a) ua = 0 m/s, (b) ua = 0.23 m/s, (c) ua = 0.42 m/s, (d) ua = 1.22 m/s, (e) ua = 1.98 m/s, and (f) ua = 2.16 m/s with a constant uc of 2.5 m/s. Shuttle speed = 1/2000 s.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Distribution of characteristic flame modes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Flame patterns visualized using the Schlieren photography when uc = 2.5 m/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Radial-temperature distributions along the axial positions at uc = 2.5 m/s. (a)–(c): ua = 0.23 m/s and (d)–(f) ua = 2.16 m/s.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Temperature distributions along the x-axis at uc = 2.5 m/s and 0 ≤ ua ≤ 2.16 m/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Variations of nondimensional peak-temperature coordinate (xp.t./D) versus ua when uc = 2.5 m/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Variations of combustion capability (Q) versus x/D for various ua when uc = 2.5 m/s. (a) Behind an unrifled nozzle, (b) behind a 6-rifled nozzle and (c) behind a 12-rifled nozzle.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Total combustion capability (Qtot) versus ua when uc = 2.5 m/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Variations of radial-concentrations at x/D = 3.75 when uc = 2.5 m/s. (a)–(c) ua = 0.23 m/s and (d)–(f) ua = 2.16 m/s.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In