Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Aircraft Engine

Effects of Advanced Engine Technology on Open Rotor Cycle Selection and Performance

[+] Author and Article Information
Christopher A. Perullo

e-mail: chris.perullo@ae.gatech.edu

Jimmy C. M. Tai

e-mail: jimmy.tai@ae.gatech.edu

Dimitri N. Mavris

e-mail: dimitri.mavris@aerospace.gatech.edu
School of Aerospace Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
270 Ferst Drive,
Atlanta, GA 30332-0150

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Aircraft Engine Committee of ASME for publication in the Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power. Manuscript received February 14, 2013; final manuscript received March 6, 2013; published online June 12, 2013. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 135(7), 071204 (Jun 12, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: GTP-13-1052; doi: 10.1115/1.4024019 History: Received February 14, 2013; Revised March 06, 2013

Recent increases in fuel prices and increased focus on aviation's environmental impacts have reignited focus on the open rotor engine concept. This type of architecture was extensively investigated in previous decades but was not pursued through to commercialization due to relatively high noise levels and a sudden, sharp decrease in fuel prices. More recent increases in fuel prices and increased government pressure from taxing carbon-dioxide production mean the open rotor is once again being investigated as a viable concept. Advances in aero-acoustic design tools have allowed industry and academia to re-investigate the open rotor with an increased emphasis on noise reduction while retaining the fuel burn benefits due to the increased propulsive efficiency. Recent research with conceptual level multidisciplinary considerations of the open rotor has been performed (Bellocq et al., 2010, “Advanced Open Rotor Performance Modeling For Multidisciplinary Optimization Assessments,” Paper No. GT2010-2963), but there remains a need for a holistic approach that includes the coupled effects of the engine and airframe on fuel burn, emissions, and noise. Years of research at Georgia Institute of Technology have led to the development of the Environmental Design Space (EDS) (Kirby and Mavris, 2008, “The Environmental Design Space,” Proceedings of the 26th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences). EDS serves to capture interdependencies at the conceptual design level of fuel burn, emissions, and noise for conventional and advanced engine and airframe architectures. Recently, leveraging NASA environmentally responsible aviation (ERA) modeling efforts, EDS has been updated to include an open rotor model to capture, in an integrated fashion, the effects of an open rotor on conventional airframe designs. Due to the object oriented nature of EDS, the focus has been on designing modular elements that can be updated as research progresses. A power management scheme has also been developed with the future capability to trade between fuel efficiency and noise using the variable pitch propeller system. Since the original GE open rotor test was performed using a military core, there is interest in seeing the effect of modern core-engine technology on the integrated open rotor performance. This research applies the modular EDS open rotor model in an engine cycle study to investigate the sensitivity of thermal efficiency improvements on open rotor performance, including the effects on weight and vehicle performance. The results are that advances in the core cycle are necessary to enable future bypass ratio growth and the trades between core operating temperatures and size become more significant as bypass ratio continues to increase. A general benefit of a 30% reduction in block fuel is seen on a 737-800 sized aircraft.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

EDS counter rotating propeller map

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

EDS open rotor high speed cruise performance

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

EDS open rotor takeoff performance

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Projected open rotor fuel burn benefit

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

EDS open rotor design sensitivities

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Open rotor modeling methodology

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Tail strike angle constraint

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

GE representative open rotor improvements




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In