Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Industrial & Cogeneration

Effects of a Low Octane Gasoline Blended Fuel on Negative Valve Overlap Enabled HCCI Load Limit, Combustion Phasing and Burn Duration

[+] Author and Article Information
Luke M. Hagen

e-mail: lumoha@umich.edu

Laura Manofsky Olesky

e-mail: manofsky@umich.edu

Stanislav V. Bohac

e-mail: sbohac@umich.edu

George Lavoie

e-mail: glavoie@umich.edu
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Michigan,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109

Dennis Assanis

Office of the Provost,
Stony Brook University,
Stony Brook, NY 11794
e-mail: dennis.assanis@stonybrook.edu

1Dennis Assanis is the former Jon R. and Beverly S. Holt Professor of Engineering, and former Director of the Walter E. Lay Automotive Laboratory at the University of Michigan. He is presently the Provost and Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs at Stony Brook University, and VP for Brookhaven Affairs.

Contributed by the IC Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power. Manuscript received November 18, 2012; final manuscript received November 26, 2012; published online June 12, 2013. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 135(7), 072001 (Jun 12, 2013) (10 pages) Paper No: GTP-12-1439; doi: 10.1115/1.4023885 History: Received November 18, 2012; Revised November 26, 2012

Homogeneous charge compression iginition (HCCI) combustion allows for the use of fuels with octane requirements below that of spark-ignited engines. A reference gasoline was compared with iso-octane and a low octane blend of gasoline and 40% n-heptane, NH40. Experiments were conducted on a single cylinder engine operating with negative valve overlap (NVO). The fuel flow rate per cycle was compensated based on the lower heating value to maintain a constant energy addition across fuels. Iso-octane and gasoline demonstrated similar maximum load, achieving a gross IMEPg of ~430 kPa, whereas the NH40 demonstrated an increased IMEPg of ~460 kPa. The NH40 could be operated at a later phasing compared with the higher octane fuels, and exhibited a shorter burn duration at a given fueling rate and phasing. These results could be due to compositional differences, as NH40 required less NVO compared to iso-octane and gasoline, leading to less thermal and compositional stratification, as well as a higher O2 concentration and less residual gas. Additionally, the NH40 fuel demonstrated a higher intermediate temperature heat release than the higher octane fuels, potentially contributing to the shorter burn duration. Overall, these results demonstrate clear benefits to NVO enabled HCCI combustion with low octane fuels.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Onishi, S., Jo, H. S., Shoda, K., Jo, P. D., and Kato, S., 1979, “Active Thermo-Atmoshphere Combustion (ATAC)—A New Combustion Processs for Internal Combustion Engines,” SAE Technical Paper No. 790501. [CrossRef]
Najt, P. M., and Foster, D. E., 1983, “Compression-Ignited Homogeneous Charge Combustion,” SAE Paper No. 830264. [CrossRef]
Hildingsson, L., Kalghatgi, G., Tait, N., Johansson, B., and Harrison, A., 2009, “Fuel Octane Effects in the Partially Premixed Combustion Regime in Compression Ignition Engines,” SAE Paper No. 2009-01-2648. [CrossRef]
Shibata, G., and Urushihara, T., 2008, “Dual Phase High Temperature Heat Release Combustion,” SAE Paper No. 2008-01-0007. [CrossRef]
Shibata, G., and Urushihara, T., 2009, “Realization of Dual Phase High Temperature Heat Release Combustion of Base Gasoline Blends From Oil Refineries and a Study of HCCI Combustion Processes,” SAE Paper No. 2009-01-0298. [CrossRef]
Yang, Y., Dec, J., Dronniou, N., Sjöberg, M., and Cannella, W., 2011, “Partial Fuel Stratification to Control HCCI Heat Release Rates: Fuel Composition and Other Factors Affecting Pre-Ignition Reactions of Two-Stage Ignition Fuels,” SAE Paper No. 2011-01-1359. [CrossRef]
Yang, Y., Dec, J., and Dronniou, N., 2012, “Boosted HCCI Combustion Using Low-Octane Gasoline With Fully Premixed and Partially Stratified Charges,” SAE Paper No. 2012-01-1120. [CrossRef]
Dec, J. E., and Yang, Y., 2010, “Boosted HCCI for High Power Without Engine Knock and With Ultra-Low NOx Emissions—Using Conventional Gasoline,” SAE Paper No. 2010-01-1086. [CrossRef]
Manofsky, L., Vavra, J., and Babajimopoulos, A., 2011, “Bridging the Gap Between HCCI and SI: Spark-Assisted Compression Ignition,” SAE Paper No. 2011-01-1179. [CrossRef]
Olsson, J., Tunestå, L. P., Ulfvik, J., and Johansson, B., 2003, “The Effect of Cooled EGR on Emissions and Performance of a Turbocharged HCCI Engine,” SAE Paper No. 2003-01-0743. [CrossRef]
Babajimopoulos, A., Challa, V., Lavoie, G., and Assanis, D., 2009, “Model-Based Assessment of Two Variable CAM Timing Strategies for HCCI Engines: Recompression vs. Rebreathing,” Proceedings of the ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division 2009 Spring Technical Conference, Milwaukee, WI, May 3–6, ASME Paper No. ICES2009-76103. [CrossRef]
Eng, J., 2002, “Characterization of Pressure Waves in HCCI Combustion,” SAE Paper No. 2002-01-2859. [CrossRef]
Chang, J., Güralp, O., Filipi, Z., Assanis, D., Kuo, T.-W., Najt, P., and Rask, R., 2004, “New Heat Transfer Correlation for an HCCI Engine Derived From Measurments of Instantaneous Surface Heat Flux,” SAE Paper No. 2004-01-2996. [CrossRef]
Woschni, G., 1967, “A Universally Applicable Equation for the Instantaneous Heat Transfer Coefficient in the Internal Combustion Engine,” SAE Paper No. 670931. [CrossRef]
Ortiz-Soto, E. A., Vavra, J., and Babajimopoulos, A., 2011, “Assessment of Residual Mass Estimation Methods for Cylinder Pressure Heat Release Analysis of HCCI Engines With Negative Valve Overlap,” Proceedings of the ASME 2011 Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Technical Conference, Morgantown, WV, October 2–5, ASME Paper No. ICES2011-60167. [CrossRef]
Lavoie, G. A., Martz, J., Wooldridge, M., and Assanis, D., 2010, “A Multi-Mode Combustion Diagram for Spark Assisted Compression Ignition,” Combust. Flame, 157(6), pp. 1106–1110. [CrossRef]
Sjöberg, M., and Dec, J. E., 2005, “An Investigation Into Lowest Acceptable Combustion Temperatures for Hydrocarbon Fuels in HCCI Engines,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 30(2), pp. 2719–2726. [CrossRef]
Manofsky-Olesky, L., Vavra, J., Babajimopoulos, A., and Assanis, D., 2012, “Internal Residual vs. Elevated Intake Temperature: How the Method of Charge Preheating Affects the Phasing Limitations of HCCI Combustion,” Proceedings of the ASME 2012 Internal Combustion Engine Division Spring Technical Conference, Torino, Italy, May 6–9, Paper No. ICES2012-81127.
He, X., Donovan, M., Zigler, B., Palmer, T., Walton, S., Wooldridge, M., and Atreya, A., 2005, “An Experimental and Modeling Study of Iso-Octane Ignition Delay Times Under Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition Conditions,” Combust. Flame, 142(3), pp. 266–275. [CrossRef]
Martz, J. B., 2010, “Simulation and Model Development for Auto-Ignition and Reaction Front Propagation in Low Temperature High-Pressure Lean-Burn Engines,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Rothamer, D. A., Snyder, J. A., Hanson, R. K., Steeper, R. R., and Fitzgerald, R. P., 2009, “Simultaneous Imaging of Exhaust Gas Residuals and Temperature During HCCI Combustion,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 32(2), pp. 2869–2876. [CrossRef]
Sjöberg, M., and Dec, J. E., 2004, “Comparing Enhanced Natural Thermal Stratification Against Retarded Combustion Phasing for Smoothing of HCCI Heat-Release Rates,” SAE Paper No. 2004-01-2994. [CrossRef]
Hwang, W., Dec, J., and Sjoberg, M., 2008, “Spectroscopic and Chemical-Kinetic Analysis of the Phases of HCCI Autoignition and Combustion for Single- and Two-Stage Ignition Fuels,” Combust. Flame, 154(3), pp. 387–409. [CrossRef]
Sjöberg, M., and Dec, J. E., 2003, “Combined Effects of Fuel-Type and Engine Speed on Intake Temperature Requirements and Completeness of Bulk-Gas Reactions for HCCI Combustion,” SAE Paper No. 2003-01-3173. [CrossRef]
Sjöberg, M., and Dec, J. E., 2007. “EGR and Intake Boost for Managing HCCI Low-Temperature Heat Release Over Wide Ranges of Engine Speed,” SAE Paper No. 2007-01-0051. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of the FFVA experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Operational range of the baseline gasoline

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

NVO range of the baseline gasoline

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Comparison of required NVO for the three test fuels

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Overlaid operational range of the test fuels, highlighting the 9.0 bar EMEP and peak EMEP cases

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of IMEPg for sweeps at 9.0 bar EMEP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Cylinder pressure trace for the most advanced cases at 9.0 bar EMEP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Comparing fuel/air (φ) and fuel/charge (φ′) equivalence ratio with thermal efficiency

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Heat release and inferred average cylinder temperature for the most advanced cases at 9.0 bar EMEP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Heat release and inferred average cylinder temperature at the most retarded phasing at the highest EMEP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Decreasing burn duration with lower octane fuels at 9 bar EMEP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Comparison of burn duration at peak load sweeps for the three fuels

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Comparison of the 10–90 burn duration to CA50 and CA90 at 9.0 bar EMEP (lower graph) and peak load (upper graph—9.8 bar for Iso-octane, 10.0 bar for NH40) EMEP for iso-octane and NH40

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Estimated oxygen and residual gas mass fractions for the NVO sweep at 9 bar EMEP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Normalized HRR of the highest IMEPg points at 9 bar EMEP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Rescaled HRR to highlight ITHR for NH40 at 9 bar EMEP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Normalized HRR of the highest IMEPg points at the highest EMEP for three fuels

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Rescaled HRR to highlight ITHR for NH40 at peak IMEPg and EMEP




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In