0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Controls, Diagnostics, and Instrumentation

Analysis of the Exhaust Gas Recirculation System Performance in Modern Diesel Engines

[+] Author and Article Information
Stefano d'Ambrosio

e-mail: stefano.dambrosio@polito.it

Alessandro Ferrari

e-mail: alessandro.ferrari@polito.it

Ezio Spessa

e-mail: ezio.spessa@polito.it
Energy Department,
IC Engines Advanced Laboratory,
Politecnico di Torino,
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi, 24,
Torino 10129, Italy

Contributed by the Controls, Diagnostics and Instrumentation Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received November 28, 2012; final manuscript received January 31, 2013; published online June 24, 2013. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 135(8), 081601 (Jun 24, 2013) (13 pages) Paper No: GTP-12-1457; doi: 10.1115/1.4024089 History: Received November 28, 2012; Revised January 31, 2013

Exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) is extensively employed in diesel combustion engines to achieve nitrogen oxides emission targets. The EGR is often cooled in order to increase the effectiveness of the strategy, even though this leads to a further undesired impact on particulate matter and hydrocarbons. Experimental tests were carried out on a diesel engine at a dynamometer rig under steady-state speed and load working conditions that were considered relevant for the New European Driving Cycle. Two different shell and tube-type EGR coolers were compared, in terms of the pressure and temperature of the exhaust and intake lines, to evaluate thermal effectiveness and induced pumping losses. All the relevant engine parameters were acquired along EGR trade-off curves, in order to perform a detailed comparison of the two coolers. The effect of intake throttling operation on increasing the EGR ratio was also investigated. A purposely designed aging procedure was run in order to characterize the deterioration of the thermal effectiveness and verify whether clogging of the EGR cooler occurred. The EGR mass flow-rate dependence on the pressure and temperature upstream of the turbine as well as the pressure downstream of the EGR control valve was modeled by means of the expression for convergent nozzles. The restricted flow-area at the valve-seat passage and the discharge coefficient were accurately determined as functions of the valve lift.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Scheme of the cooled short-route EGR system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Cooler A, aged (a) and cooler B, new (b)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Thermal effectiveness versus λ

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Thermal effectiveness versus m·EGR/m·EGR,ref

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Intake manifold temperature versus m·EGR/m·EGR,ref

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Gas temperature at the EGR cooler inlet versus λ

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Gas temperature at the EGR cooler outlet versus λ

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

EGR mass fraction versus λ

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

NOx emissions versus oxygen fraction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Pressure drop in the EGR line versus m·EGR/m·EGR,ref

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Lift of the EGR control valve versus m·EGR/m·EGR,ref

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Pressure drop in the EGR line and in the cooler versus λ

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Brake specific fuel consumption versus λ

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Thermal effectiveness versus pneumatic efficiency

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Indicated and mechanical efficiency versus λ

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Thermal effectiveness versus pneumatic efficiency

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Thermal effectiveness versus pneumatic efficiency

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Lift of the EGR control-valve versus m·EGR/m·EGR,ref

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Effect of throttling: lv versus bmep

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Effect of throttling: NOx versus bmep

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Effect of throttling: bsfc versus bmep

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 24

Cooler B: thermal effectiveness versus time

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

Thermal effectiveness versus m·EGR,ref/m·EGR

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

Thermal effectiveness versus NTU

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 26

EGR flow-rate, valve lift and pressure drop at different coolant temperatures for cooler B during the run-in

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 25

Cooler B: bsfc versus time during the run-in phase

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 27

Geometrical data of the EGR control valve

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 28

Location of the restricted flow-area of the control valve for different valve lifts

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 29

Valve discharge coefficient as a function of lv

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 30

Valve restricted flow-area as a function of lv

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In