0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Structures and Dynamics

Leakage and Rotordynamic Coefficients of Brush Seals With Zero Cold Clearance Used in an Arrangement With Labyrinth Fins

[+] Author and Article Information
Manuel Gaszner

Research Assistant break/>e-mail: gaszner@es.mw.tum.de

Alexander O. Pugachev

Research Associate
e-mail: pugachev@tum.de

Institute of Energy Systems,
Technische Universität München,
Garching 85748, Germany

Christos Georgakis

Manager, CT Blades,
ALSTOM,
Rugby CV21 2NH, UK
e-mail: christos.georgakis@power.alstom.com

Paul Cooper

Steam Turbines Chief Engineers Office,
ALSTOM,
Rugby CV21 2NH, UK
e-mail: paul.cooper@power.alstom.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Structures and Dynamics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received June 13, 2013; final manuscript received August 1, 2013; published online September 23, 2013. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 135(12), 122506 (Sep 23, 2013) (11 pages) Paper No: GTP-13-1167; doi: 10.1115/1.4025236 History: Received June 13, 2013; Revised August 01, 2013

A brush-labyrinth sealing configuration consisting of two labyrinth fins upstream and one brush seal downstream is studied experimentally and theoretically. Two slightly different brush seal designs with zero cold radial clearance are considered. The sealing configurations are tested on the no-whirl and dynamic test rigs to obtain leakage performance and rotordynamic stiffness and damping coefficients. The no-whirl tests allow identification of the local rotordynamic direct and cross-coupled stiffness coefficients for a wide range of operating conditions, while the dynamic test rig is used to obtain both global stiffness and damping coefficients but for a narrower operating range limited by the capabilities of a magnetic actuator. Modeling of the brush-labyrinth seals is performed using computational fluid dynamics. The experimental global rotordynamic coefficients consist of an aerodynamic component due to the gas flow and a mechanical component due to the contact between the bristle tips and rotor surface. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD)–based calculations of rotordynamic coefficients provide, however, only the aerodynamic component. A simple mechanical model is used to estimate the theoretical value of the mechanical stiffness of the bristle pack during the contact. The results obtained for the sealing configurations with zero cold radial clearance brush seals are compared with available data on three-tooth-on-stator labyrinth seals and a brush seal with positive cold radial clearance. Results show that the sealing arrangement with a line-on-line welded brush seal has the best performance overall with the lowest leakage and cross-coupled stiffness. The predictions are generally in agreement with the measurements for leakage and stiffness coefficients. The seal-damping capability is noticeably underpredicted.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Air supply and swirl generator system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The no-whirl test rig (left) and eccentric rotor operation (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The dynamic test rig (top) and magnetic actuator operation (bottom)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Schemes of the sealing arrangements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Experimental effective clearance for various sealing configurations versus pressure ratio

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Experimental local stiffness coefficients for medium preswirl

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Preswirl influence on the experimental local stiffness coefficients (SSB-1 and SSB-2 seals)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Effect of rotational speed on the experimental local stiffness coefficients

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Experimental global rotordynamic coefficients for medium preswirl

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Computational model of the SSB-1 seal

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Single bristle as cantilever beam [14]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Experimental and predicted leakage for the SSB-1 and SSB-2 seals

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Experimental and predicted local stiffness coefficients for the SSB-1 and SSB-2 seals

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Experimental and predicted global rotordynamic coefficients for the SSB-1 and SSB-2 seals

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In