0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Aircraft Engine

Multidisciplinary Analysis of a Geared Fan Intercooled Core Aero-Engine

[+] Author and Article Information
Konstantinos G. Kyprianidis

Cranfield University,
Bedfordshire MK43 0AL, UK
e-mail: k.kyprianidis@gmail.com;
k.kyprianidis@cranfield.ac.uk

Andrew M. Rolt

Rolls-Royce plc,
Derby DE24 8BJ, UK

Tomas Grönstedt

Chalmers University of Technology,
Gothenburg SE-41296, Sweden

Contributed by the Aircraft Engine Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 11, 2013; final manuscript received August 9, 2013; published online October 22, 2013. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 136(1), 011203 (Oct 22, 2013) (11 pages) Paper No: GTP-13-1258; doi: 10.1115/1.4025244 History: Received July 11, 2013; Revised August 09, 2013

The reduction of CO2 emissions is strongly linked with the improvement of engine specific fuel consumption, along with the reduction of engine nacelle drag and weight. One alternative design approach to improving specific fuel consumption is to consider a geared fan combined with an increased overall pressure ratio intercooled core performance cycle. The thermal benefits from intercooling have been well documented in the literature. Nevertheless, there is very little information available in the public domain with respect to design space exploration of such an engine concept when combined with a geared fan. The present work uses a multidisciplinary conceptual design tool to analyze the option of an intercooled core geared fan aero engine for long haul applications with a 2020 entry into service technology level assumption. With minimum mission fuel in mind, the results indicate as optimal values a pressure ratio split exponent of 0.38 and an intercooler mass flow ratio of 1.18 at hot-day top of climb conditions. At ISA midcruise conditions a specific thrust of 86 m/s, a jet velocity ratio of 0.83, an intercooler effectiveness of 56%, and an overall pressure ratio value of 76 are likely to be a good choice. A 70,000 lbf intercooled turbofan engine is large enough to make efficient use of an all-axial compression system, particularly within a geared fan configuration, but intercooling is perhaps more likely to be applied to even larger engines. The proposed optimal jet velocity ratio is actually higher than the value one would expect by using standard analytical expressions, primarily because this design variable affects core efficiency at mid-cruise due to a combination of several different subtle changes to the core cycle and core component efficiencies at this condition. The analytical expressions do not consider changes in core efficiency and the beneficial effect of intercooling on transfer efficiency, nor do they account for losses in the bypass duct and jet pipe, while a relatively detailed engine performance model, such as the one utilized in this study, does. Mission fuel results from a surrogate model are in good agreement with the results obtained from a rubberized-wing aircraft model for some of the design parameters. This indicates that it is possible to replace an aircraft model with specific fuel consumption and weight penalty exchange rates. Nevertheless, drag count exchange rates have to be utilized to properly assess changes in mission fuel for those design parameters that affect nacelle diameter.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

General arrangement of the direct-drive fan intercooled core configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

General arrangement of the geared fan intercooled core configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Performance model of the geared fan intercooled core configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Conceptual design tool algorithm [20]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Fan design parameters at top of climb

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Specific thrust versus efficiency at midcruise

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Specific thrust versus engine component weight, size, and stage count

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Specific thrust versus block fuel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Jet velocity ratio versus midcruise SFC and efficiency

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Jet velocity ratio versus top of climb behavior and engine weight

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Jet velocity ratio versus block fuel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Intercooler mass flow ratio versus midcruise SFC, efficiency, weight, and size

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Intercooler mass flow ratio versus block fuel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

OPR versus pressure ratio split exponent

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Pressure ratio split versus midcruise SFC and efficiency

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Pressure ratio split versus top of climb SFC

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Pressure ratio split versus engine weight and size

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Pressure ratio split versus engine component weight and stage count

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Pressure ratio split versus block fuel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Overall pressure ratio versus SFC at midcruise

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Overall pressure ratio versus efficiency at midcruise

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

Overall pressure ratio versus engine component weight and stage count

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

Overall pressure ratio versus block fuel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 24

Intercooler effectiveness at midcruise versus combustor outlet temperature and bypass ratio

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 25

Intercooler effectiveness at midcruise versus efficiency

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 26

Intercooler effectiveness at midcruise versus block fuel

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In