0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Structures and Dynamics

Measured Comparison of Leakage and Rotordynamic Characteristics for a Slanted-Tooth and a Straight-Tooth Labyrinth Seal

[+] Author and Article Information
Naitik J. Mehta

Mechanical Engineer-Rotating Equipment,
Bechtel OG&C,
Houston, TX 77056
e-mail: nmehta1@bechtel.com

Dara W. Childs

The Leland T. Jordan Chair
of Mechanical Engineering,
Turbomachinery Laboratory,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77843
e-mail: dchilds@tamu.edu

Contributed by the Structures and Dynamics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 31, 2013; final manuscript received August 16, 2013; published online October 21, 2013. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 136(1), 012501 (Oct 21, 2013) (11 pages) Paper No: GTP-13-1286; doi: 10.1115/1.4025267 History: Received July 31, 2013; Revised August 16, 2013

Measured results are presented to compare rotordynamic coefficients and leakage of a slanted-tooth labyrinth seal and a straight-tooth labyrinth seal. Both seals had identical pitch, depth, and number of teeth. The teeth inclination angle of the teeth on the slanted-tooth labyrinth was 65 deg from the normal axis. Experiments were carried out at an inlet pressure of 70 bar-a (1015 psi-a), pressure ratios of 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6, rotor speeds of 10.2, 15.35, and 20.2 krpm, and a radial clearance of 0.2 mm (8 mils). One zero and two positive inlet preswirl ratios were used. The results show only minute difference in the rotordynamic coefficients between the two seals. The slanted-tooth labyrinth seal consistently leaked approximately 10% less at all conditions. Predictions were made using a one control volume bulk-flow model (1CVM) which was developed for a straight-tooth labyrinth seal design. 1CVM under-predicted the rotordynamic coefficients and the leakage.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Picardo, A. M., and Childs, D., 2005, “Rotordynamic Coefficients for a Tooth-on-Stator Labyrinth Seal at 70 Bar Supply Pressures–Measurements Versus Theory and Comparisons to a Hole-Pattern Stator Seal,” ASME J. Gas Turbine Power, 127, pp. 843–855. [CrossRef]
Meyer, C. A., and Lowrie, J. A., III, 1975, “The Leakage Thru Straight and Slant Labyrinths and Honeycomb Seals,” ASME J. Gas Turbine Power, Ser. A, 97, pp. 495–501. [CrossRef]
Stocker, H. L., Cox, D. M., and Holle, G. F., 1977, “Aerodynamic Performance of Conventional and Advanced Design Labyrinth Seals With Solid-Smooth, Abradable, and Honeycomb Lands,” NASA CR-135307, (EDR 9339), Detroit Diesel Allison, Division of General Motors Corp., Indianapolis, IN.
Tipton, D. L., Scott, T. E., and Vogel, R. E., 1986, “Analytical and Experimental Development of a Design Model for Labyrinth Seals,” AFWAL-TR-85-2103, Vol. III, Allison Gas Turbine, Division of General Motors Corp., Indianapolis, IN.
Wagner, N. G., and Steff, K., 1996, “Dynamic Labyrinth Coefficients From a High-Pressure Full-Scale Test Rig Using Magnetic Bearings,” Proceedings of the Conference on Rotordynamic Instability Problems in High-Performance Turbomachinery, NASA Conference Publication, No. 3344, pp. 95–111.
Wagner, N. G., 2001, “Reliable Rotor Dynamic Design of High-Pressure Compressors Based on Test Rig Data,” ASME J. Gas Turbine Power, 123, pp. 849–856. [CrossRef]
Wagner, N. G., 2009, “Investigations on the Dynamic Coefficients of Impeller Eye Labyrinth Seals,” Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Turbomachinery Symposium, Houston, TX, September 14–17, pp. 54–70.
Childs, D., and Scharrer, J., 1986, “Iwatsubo-Based Solution for Labyrinth Seals: Comparison to Experimental Results,” ASME J. Gas Turbine Power, 108, pp. 325–331. [CrossRef]
Scharrer, J., 1988, “Theory Versus Experiment for the Rotordynamic Coefficients of Labyrinth Gas Seals: Part I—A Two Control Volume Model,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 110, pp. 270–280. [CrossRef]
Vannini, G., Cioncolini, S., Calicchio, V., and Tedone, F., 2011, “Development of a High Pressure Rotordynamic Test Rig for Centrifugal Compressors Internal Seals Characterization,” Proceedings of the Fortieth Turbomachinery Symposium, Houston, TX, September 12–15, pp. 46–59.
Childs, D., and Hale, K., 1994, “A Test Apparatus and Facility to Identify the Rotordynamic Coefficients of High-Speed Hydrostatic Bearings,” ASME J. Tribol., 116, pp. 337–334. [CrossRef]
Dawson, M., Childs, D., Holt, C., and Phillips, S., 2002, “Theory Versus Experiments for the Dynamic Dynamic Stiffnesses of Annular Gas Seals: Part I—Test Facility and Apparatus,” ASME J. Gas Turbine Power, 124, pp. 958–963. [CrossRef]
Weatherwax, M., and Childs, D., 2003, “The Influence of Eccentricity on the Leakage and Rotordynamic Coefficients of a High Pressure, Honeycomb, Annular Gas Seal Measurements Versus Predictions,” ASME J. Tribol., 125, pp. 422–429. [CrossRef]
Childs, D., and Wade, J., 2004, “Rotordynamic-Coefficient and Leakage Characteristics for Hole-Pattern-Stator Annular Gas Seals-Measurements Versus Predictions,” ASME J. Tribol., 126, pp. 326–333. [CrossRef]
Stanway, R., Burrows, C., and Holmes, R., 1978, “Pseudo-Random Binary Sequence Forcing in Journal and Squeeze Film Bearings,” ASLE Transactions, 22(4), pp. 315–322.
Rouvas, C., and Childs, D., 1993, “A Parameter Identification Method for the Rotordynamic Coefficients of a High Reynolds Number Hydrostatic Bearing,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 115, pp. 264–270. [CrossRef]
Bendat, S., and Piersol, G., 1980, Engineering Applications of Correlation and Spectral Analysis, J. Wiley and Sons, New York.
Mehta, N. J., 2012, “Comparison of a Slanted-Tooth See-Through Labyrinth Seal and a Straight-Tooth See-Through Labyrinth Seal For Rotordynamic Coefficients and Leakage,” M.S. thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Seal tooth profile of the seals

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Cross-sectional view of annular gas seal test stand (AGSTS) [14]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Detailed sectional drawings of the preswirl rings [14]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Preswirl measurement and preswirl ring [14]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Dimensions for the slanted-tooth labyrinth seal

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Dimensions for the straight-tooth labyrinth seal

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Horizontal stiffener

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Vertical stiffener

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Stator coordinate systems viewed from the NDE

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Dynamic stiffness data for slanted-tooth labyrinth after subtracting the baseline data

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Variation of Re(HXX) with the stator masses

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Variation of Re(HYY) with the stator masses

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Cross-coupled stiffness versus inlet preswirl ratio

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Direct damping versus inlet preswirl

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Reaction forces developed by a synchronously-precessing labyrinth seal

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Effective damping versus inlet preswirl

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Whirl frequency ratio for slanted-tooth labyrinth seal

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Seal leakage versus inlet preswirl

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Prediction versus measurements of k and C at 20.2 krpm and 0.5 PR

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Prediction versus measurements for Ceff at 20.2 krpm and 0.5 PR

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

Prediction versus measurements of leakage rate (m·) at 20,200 rpm and 0.5 PR

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In