Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions

Influence of Burner Material, Tip Temperature, and Geometrical Flame Configuration on Flashback Propensity of H2-Air Jet Flames

[+] Author and Article Information
Vincent McDonell

UCI Combustion Laboratory,
University of California,
Irvine, CA 92697-3550

Thomas Sattelmayer

Lehrstuhl für Thermodynamik,
Technische Universität München,
Boltzmannstrasse 15,
Garching D-85747, Germany

Contributed by the Combustion and Fuels Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 3, 2013; final manuscript received July 29, 2013; published online October 28, 2013. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 136(2), 021502 (Oct 28, 2013) (10 pages) Paper No: GTP-13-1230; doi: 10.1115/1.4025359 History: Received July 03, 2013; Revised July 29, 2013

Flashback is a key operability issue for low emission premixed combustion systems operated on high hydrogen content fuels. Previous work investigated fuel composition impacts on flashback propensity and found that burner tip temperature was important in correlating flashback data in premixed jet flames. An enclosure around the jet flame was found to enhance the flame–burner rim interaction. The present study further addresses these issues using a jet burner with various geometric configurations and interchangeable materials. Systematic studies addressing the quantitative influence of various parameters such as tip temperature, burner material, enclosure size, and burner diameter on flashback propensity were carried out. A comprehensive overview of the flashback limits for all conditions tested in the current study as well as those published previously is given. The collective results indicate that the burner materials, tip temperature, and flame confinement play significant roles for flashback propensity and thus help explain previous scatter in flashback data. Furthermore, the present work indicates that the upstream flame propagation during flashback is affected by the burner material. The material with lower thermal conductivity yields larger flashback propensity but slower flame regression inside the tube. These observations can be potentially exploited to minimize the negative impacts of flashback in practical applications.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Lieuwen, T., McDonell, V., Santavicca, D., and Sattelmayer, T., 2008, “Burner Development and Operability Issues Associated With Steady Flowing Syngas Fired Combustors,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 180(6), pp. 1169–1192. [CrossRef]
Lewis, B., and von Elbe, G., 1943, “Stability and Structure of Burner Flames,” J. Chem. Phys., 11(2), pp. 75–97. [CrossRef]
Wohl, K., 1953, “Quenching, Flash-Back, Blow-Off-Theory and Experiment,” Symp. (Int.) Combust., 4(1), pp. 68–89. [CrossRef]
Putnam, A. A., and Jensen, R. A., 1949, “Application of Dimensionless Numbers to Flash-Back and Other Combustion Phenomena,” Symp. Combust. Flame Explosion Phenom., 3(1), pp. 89–98. [CrossRef]
Grumer, J., 1949, “Predicting Burner Performance With Interchanged Fuel Gases,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 41(12), pp. 2756–2761. [CrossRef]
Grumer, J., and Harris, M. E., 1952, “Flame-Stability Limits of Methane, Hydrogen, and Carbon Monoxide Mixtures,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 44(7), pp. 1547–1553. [CrossRef]
Grumer, J., Harris, M. E., and Schultz, H., 1952, “Predicting Interchangeability of Fuel Gases. Interchangeability of Oil Gases or Propane-Air Fuels With Natural Gases,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 44(7), pp. 1554–1559. [CrossRef]
Grumer, J., and Harris, M. E., 1954, “Temperature Dependence of Stability Limits of Burner Flames,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 46(11), pp. 2424–2430. [CrossRef]
Grumer, J., Harris, M. E., and Schultz, H., 1955, “Flame-Stability Limits of Ethylene, Propane, Methane, Hydrogen, and Nitrogen Mixtures,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 47(9), pp. 1760–1767. [CrossRef]
Grumer, J., Harris, M. E., and Rowe, V., 1956, Fundamental Flashback, Blow Off, and Yellow-Tip Limits of Fuel Gas–Air Mixtures, United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines.
Caffo, E., and Padovani, C., 1963, “Flashback in Premixed Air Flames,” Combust. Flame, 7(4), pp. 331–337. [CrossRef]
Van Krevelen, D. W., and Chermin, H. A. G., 1958, “Generalized Flame Stability Diagram for the Prediction of Interchangeability Of Gases,” Symp. (Int.) Combust., 7(1), pp. 358–368. [CrossRef]
Putnam, A. A., Ball, D. A., and Levy, A., 1980, “Effect of Fuel Composition on Relation of Burning Velocity to Product of Quenching Distance and Flashback Velocity Gradient,” Combust. Flame, 37, pp. 193–196. [CrossRef]
Ball, D. A., Putnam, A. A., Radhakrishman, E., and Levy, A., 1978, “Relation of Burning Velocity, Quenching Distance, and Flashback Velocity Gradient for Low and Intermediate BTU Gases,” Battelle Columbus Laboratories, Columbus, OH.
Yamazaki, K., and Tsuji, H., 1961, “An Experimental Investigation on the Stability of Turbulent Burner Flames,” Symp. (Int.) Combust., 8(1), pp. 543–553. [CrossRef]
Fine, B., 1957, “Stability Limits and Burning Velocities for Some Laminar and Turbulent Propane and Hydrogen Flames at Reduced Pressure,” NACA Technical Note, 4031 p. 49.
Fine, B., 1958, “Flashback of Laminar and Turbulent Burner Flames at Reduced Pressure,” Combust. Flame, 2(3), pp. 253–266. [CrossRef]
Fine, B., 1959, “Effect of Initial Temperature on Flash Back of Laminar and Turbulent Burner Flames,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 51(4), pp. 564–566. [CrossRef]
Dugger, G. L., 1955, “Flame Stability of Preheated Propane–Air Mixtures,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 47(1), pp. 109–114. [CrossRef]
Khitrin, L. N., Moin, P. B., Smirnov, D. B., and Shevchuk, V. U., 1965, “Peculiarities of Laminar- and Turbulent-Flame Flashbacks,” Symp. (Int.) Combust., 10(1), pp. 1285–1291. [CrossRef]
Bollinger, L. E., and Edse, R., “Effect of Burner-Tip Temperature on Flash Back of Turbulent Hydrogen-Oxygen Flames,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 48(4), pp. 802–807. [CrossRef]
Kedia, K. S., and Ghoniem, A. F., 2012, “Mechanisms of Stabilization and Blowoff of a Premixed Flame Downstream of a Heat-Conducting Perforated Plate,” Combust. Flame, 159(3), pp. 1055–1069. [CrossRef]
Shaffer, B., Duan, Z., and McDonell, V., 2013, “Study of Fuel Composition Effects on Flashback Using a Confined Jet Flame Burner,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 135(1), p. 011502. [CrossRef]
Eichler, C., and Sattelmayer, T., 2011, “Experiments on Flame Flashback in a Quasi-2D Turbulent Wall Boundary Layer for Premixed Methane-Hydrogen-Air Mixtures,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 133(1), p. 011503. [CrossRef]
Eichler, C., Baumgartner, G., and Sattelmayer, T., 2012, “Experimental Investigation of Turbulent Boundary Layer Flashback Limits for Premixed Hydrogen-Air Flames Confined in Ducts,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(1), p. 011502. [CrossRef]
Lee, S. T., and Tien, J. S., 1982, “A Numerical-Analysis of Flame Flashback in a Premixed Laminar System,” Combust. Flame, 48(3), pp. 273–285. [CrossRef]
Kurdyumov, V. N., Fernández, E., and Liñán, A., 2000, “Flame Flashback and Propagation of Premixed Flames Near a Wall,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 28(2), pp. 1883–1889. [CrossRef]
Kurdyumov, V. N., Truffaut, J. M., Quinard, J., Wangher, A., and Searby, G., 2008, “Oscillations of Premixed Flames in Tubes Near the Flashback Conditions” Combust. Sci. Technol., 180(5), pp. 731–742. [CrossRef]
Kurdyumov, V., Fernández-Tarrazo, E., Truffaut, J. M., Quinard, J., Wangher, A., Searby, G., 2007, “Experimental and Numerical Study of Premixed Flame Flashback,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 31(1), pp. 1275–1282. [CrossRef]
Duan, Z., Shaffer, B., and McDonell, V., 2013, “Study of Burner Material and Tip Temperature Effects on Flashback of Confined Jet Flame,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 135(12), p. 121504. [CrossRef]
Baumgartner, G., and Sattelmayer, T., 2013, “Experimental Investigation of the Flashback Limits and Flame Propagation Mechanisms for Premixed Hydrogen–Air Flames in Non-Swirling and Swirling Flow,” ASME Turbo Expo 2013, San Antonio, TX, June 3–7, ASME Paper No. GT2013-94258.
Schlichting, H. and Gersten, K., 2000, Boundary-Layer Theory, Springer, Berlin.
Eichler, C., and Sattelmayer, T., 2012, “Premixed Flame Flashback in Wall Boundary Layers Studied by Long-Distance Micro-PIV,” Exp. Fluids, 2012, pp. 1–14.
Incropera, F. P., and DeWitt, D. P., 2002, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, 5th ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Matweb, 2013, “Online Materials Information Resource,” available from: http://www.matweb.com/


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of the axisymmetric single injector rig and associated supporting hardware (UCI burner [30])

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic of the enclosure holder (UCI injector [30])

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Injector with ceramic block (UCI burner)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Schematic of TUM/BACATEC setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Schematic of the pilot burner (TUM/BACATEC [31])

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Definition of the burner type: (a) UCI's setup and (b) TUM/BACATEC's setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Schematic of the thermocouple alignment (UCI burner [30])

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Response of the sensors (pressure transducer and TC) to FB event (sample rate = 10 Hz)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Results of the cooling effect test with 40 mm stainless tube: FB EQ versus gc

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Results of the cooling effect test with 40 mm stainless tube: FB EQ versus tip temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Comparison of measured and predicted gc value using Eq. (2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Effect of enclosure (i.d. = 63.5 mm) on FB limits (** [23])

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Effect of enclosure on the tip temperature (stainless burner only)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Effect of enclosure size on the critical velocity gradient (AFT = 1700 and 1900 K)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Effect of enclosure size on the tip temperature (AFT = 1700 and 1900 K)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Process of flame propagation in the quartz tube due to heat conduction from the block to burner

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Effect of confinement on FB limits, AFT = 1700 K (* [25])

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Material effects on the FB propensity

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Effect of burner material on the tip temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Overview of the test results with various injector configuration: diameter-burner type–material-temp ctrl: * [25], ** [23], *** [20]




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In