0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Aircraft Engine

RANS Computations of MEXICO Rotor in Uniform and Yawed Inflow

[+] Author and Article Information
Christina Tsalicoglou

e-mail: christina.tsalicoglou@alumni.ethz.ch

Samira Jafari

e-mail: jafari@lec.mavt.ethz.ch

Ndaona Chokani

e-mail: chokani@lec.mavt.ethz.ch

Reza S. Abhari

e-mail: abhari@lec.mavt.ethz.ch
Laboratory for Energy Conversion,
Department of Mechanical
and Process Engineering,
ETH Zurich,
Zurich 8092, Switzerland

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Aircraft Engine Committee of ASME for publication in the Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power. Manuscript received July 10, 2013; final manuscript received August 2, 2013; published online October 22, 2013. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 136(1), 011202 (Oct 22, 2013) (8 pages) Paper No: GTP-13-1253; doi: 10.1115/1.4025362 History: Received July 10, 2013; Revised August 02, 2013

Full Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulations of the flow in the near wake of a three-bladed horizontal-axis wind turbine are presented. The simulations, which are based on the model experiments in controlled conditions (MEXICO) experiment and include the complete rotor, nacelle, and tower show good agreement with experimental data, with 4% difference relative to measured flow properties. The flow properties in the near wake are detailed for both uniform and nonuniform flow conditions. The effects of increasing tip-speed ratio and a yawed inflow of 30 deg are studied. The full RANS simulations are used to support the development of an immersed wind turbine model at ETH Zurich. This model allows for modeling of the wake evolution and interactions in wind farms, for multiple turbines, with substantially reduced computational effort.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Crespo, A., Hernndez, J., and Frandsen, S., 1999, “Survey of Modelling Methods for Wind Turbine Wakes and Wind Farms,” Wind Energy, 2, pp. 1–24. [CrossRef]
Schepers, J. G., 2003, “ENDOW: Validation and Improvement of ECN's Wake Model,” Energy Research Center of the Netherlands, Petten, Netherlands, Technical Report No. ECN-C–03-034.
Vermeer, L., Sørensen, J., and Crespo, A., 2003, “Wind Turbine Wake Aerodynamics,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 39, pp. 467–510. [CrossRef]
Leishman, G., 2002, “Challenges in Modelling the Unsteady Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines,” Wind Energy, 5, pp. 85–132. [CrossRef]
Jafari, S., Chokani, N., and Abhari, R. S., 2012, “An Immersed Boundary Method for Efficient Simulation of Wind Flow Over Complex Terrain,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 134(1), p. 011006. [CrossRef]
Jafari, S., Chokani, N., and Abhari, R. S., 2013, “Simulation of Wake Interactions in Wind Farms Using an Immersed Wind Turbine Model,” ASME Paper No. GT2013-96035.
Kocer, G., Mansour, M., Chokani, N., Abhari, R. S., and Müller, M., 2011, “Full-Scale Wind Turbine Near Wake Measurements Using an Instrumented Uninhabited Aerial Vehicle,” ASME J. Solar Energy Eng., 133(4), p. 041011. [CrossRef]
Schepers, J. G., and Snel, H., 2007, “Model Experiments in Controlled Conditions—Final Report,” Energy Research Center of the Netherlands, Petten, Netherlands, Technical Report No. ECN-E–07-042.
Schepers, J., Boorsma, K., Bon, A., Kim, C., and Cho, T., 2011, “Results From Mexnext: Analysis of Detailed Aerodynamic Measurements on a 4.5 m Diameter Rotor Placed in the Large German Dutch Wind Tunnel DNW,” Energy Research Center of the Netherlands, Petten, Netherlands, Technical Report No. ECN-M-11-034.
Schepers, J. G., Boorsma, K., Cho, T., Gomez-Iradi, S., Schaffarczyk, P., Jeromin, A., ShenW. Z., Lutz, T., Meister, K., Stoevesandt, B., SchreckS., Micallef, D., Pereira, R., Sant, T., Madsen, H. A., and Sørensen, N., 2012, “Final Report of the IEA Task 29, Mexnext (Phase 1): Analysis of Mexico Wind Tunnel Measurements,” Energy Research Center of the Netherlands, Petten, Netherlands, Technical Report No. ECN-E-12-004.
Bechmann, A., Sørensen, N., and Zahle, F., 2011, “CFD Simulations of the MEXICO Rotor,” Wind Energy, 14, pp. 677–689. [CrossRef]
Ivanell, S., Sorensen, J. N., and Henningson, D., 2007, Numerical Computations of Wind TurbineWakes, Wind Energy, Springer, New York.
Barthelmie, R. J., Hansen, K., Frandsen, S. T., Rathmann, O., Schepers, J. G., Schlez, W., Phillips, J., Rados, K., Zervos, A., Politis, E. S., and Chaviaropoulos, P. K., 2009, “Modelling and Measuring Flow and Wind Turbine Wakes in Large Wind Farms Offshore,” Wind Energy, 12(5), pp. 431–444. [CrossRef]
Whale, J., Anderson, C. G., Barreiss, R., and Wagner, S., 2000, “An Experimental and Numerical Study of the Vortex Structure in the Wake of a Wind Turbine,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 84, pp. 1–21. [CrossRef]
Eggleston, D. M., and Stoddard, F. S., 1987, Wind Turbine Engineering Design, Springer, New York.
Barhtelmie, R. J., Folkerts, L., Larsen, G. C., Rados, K., Pryor, S. C., Frandsen, S. T., Lange, B., and Schepers, J. G., 2006, “Comparison of Wake Model Simulations With Offshore Wind Turbine Wake Profiles Measured by SODAR,” J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 23, pp. 888–901. [CrossRef]
Ebert, P. R., and Wood, D. H., 1998, “The Near Wake of a Model Horizontal-Axis Wind Turbine, Part II: General Features of the Three-Dimensional Flowfield,” Renewable Energy, 18, pp. 513–534. [CrossRef]
Wood, D. H., 1994, “Simple Equations for Helical Vortex Wakes,” J. Aircraft, 31, pp. 994–995. [CrossRef]
Coleman, R. P., Heingold, A. M., and Stempin, C. W., 1945, “Evaluation of the Induced-Velocity Field of an Idealized Helicopter Rotor,” NACA Report No. L5E10.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Wind turbine used for the MEXICO rotor experiment in the DNW wind tunnel [8] and (b) dimensions of MEXICO wind turbine in meters

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) Computational domain used for simulations of uniform inflow and (b) definition of coordinate system with yaw angle γ and pitch angle θ

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

(a) Computational domain used for simulations of yawed inflow and (b) close-up view of rotating cylindrical domain around wind turbine

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

(a) Unstructured octree-type volume mesh and (b) closer view of the mesh around the wind turbine blade at midspan

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Effect of grid refinement on predicted torque compared to experiments for different tip-speed ratios

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of predicted pressure coefficients with experiments at different spanwise positions for λ = 6.67

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Distribution of the turbulence intensity directly downstream of the rotor plane (0.1D), (a) for λ = 4.17 and (b) for λ = 6.67. The radial extent of the plot is 1D.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Location of radial traverses for prediction and measurements in MEXICO rotor experiment

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparison of predicted velocities with experiments along four radial traverses 0.05D downstream of the rotor for λ = 4.17

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Location of axial traverse for prediction and measurements in MEXICO rotor experiment

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Comparison of predicted velocity components with experiments along axial traverse for λ = 6.67

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Wake expansion against downstream distance λ = 4.17,6.67, and 10

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Contour of total velocity at x = -2D for (a) λ = 4.17 and (b) λ = 6.67. The radial extent of the plots is 2D. Comparison of predicted total velocity at x = -2D to ECN Wakefarm model for the two different tip-speed ratios.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

In-plane velocity vectors at x = -1D and x = -2D, superposed on contours of in-plane velocity magnitude for (a) for λ = 4.17 and (b) λ = 6.67. The radial extent of the plots is 1D.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Contours of vorticity in horizontal plane at hub-height. (a) λ = 4.17 and (b) λ = 6.67. Uniform inflow case.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Coordinate system for simulations with yawed inflow. The location of the axial traverse at r = rin used for comparison with measured velocities is also shown.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Periodic variation of the torque acting on the rotor operating in yawed inflow

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Comparison of the predicted velocity components with experiment along axial traverse for yawed inflow case

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Contour of total velocity at x = -0.5D. The radial extent of the plot is 2D. The location of the tower and rotor is shown in the left half of the plane.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Plan view of predicted total velocity in horizontal plane at hub height. Yawed inflow case. Tip-speed ratio is 6.67.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Contours of (a) yaw angles and (b) in-plane velocities at x = -1D. The radial extent of the plots is 2D. The location of the tower and rotor is shown in the left half of the plane.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

Contour of vorticity in horizontal plane at hub-height. 30 deg yawed inflow case.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In