Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Controls, Diagnostics, and Instrumentation

An Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Wave Propagation in Teflon and Nylon Tubing With Methods to Prevent Aliasing in Pressure Scanners

[+] Author and Article Information
Adam M. Hurst

e-mail: adamh@kulite.com

Joe VanDeWeert

e-mail: joev@kulite.com
Kulite® Semiconductor Products Inc.,
One Willow Tree Road,
Leonia, NJ 07605

Contributed by the Controls, Diagnostics and Instrumentation Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received June 27, 2013; final manuscript received July 3, 2013; published online September 6, 2013. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 135(10), 101602 (Sep 06, 2013) (7 pages) Paper No: GTP-13-1196; doi: 10.1115/1.4025004 History: Received June 27, 2013; Revised July 03, 2013

Accurate static and dynamic pressure measurements provide the feedback needed to advance gas turbine efficiency and reliability as well as improve aircraft design and flight control. During turbine testing and aircraft flight testing, flush mounting pressure transducers at the desired pressure measurement location is not always feasible and recess mounting with connective tubing is often used as an alternative. Resonances in the connective tubing can result in aliasing within pressure scanners even within a narrow bandwidth and especially when higher frequency content dc to ∼125 Hz is desired. We present experimental results that investigate tube resonances and attenuation in 1.35 mm inner diameter (I.D.) (used on 0.063 in. tubulations) and 2.69 mm I.D. (used on 0.125 in. tubulations) Teflon and Nylon tubing at various lengths. We utilize a novel dynamic pressure generator, capable of creating large changes in air pressure (<1 psi to 10 psi, <6.8 kPa to 68.9 kPa), to determine the frequency response of such tubing from ∼1 Hz to 2800 Hz. We further compare these experimental results to established analytical models for propagation of pressure disturbances in narrow tubes. While significant theoretical and experimental work relating to the frequency response of connective tubing or transmission lines has been published, there is limited literature presenting experimental frequency response data with air as the media in elastic tubing. In addition, little progress has been made in addressing the issue of tubing-related aliasing within pressure scanners, as the low sampling rate in scanners often makes postprocessing antialiasing filters ineffective.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Epstein, A. H., 1985, “High Frequency Response Measurements in Turbomachinery,” Fluid Dynamics Measurement Techniques in Turbomachines, Vol. 1, (VKI Lecture Series 1985-03) von Karman Institute, Rhode-St-Genese, Belgium, p. 104.
Whitmore, S. A., Lindsey, W. T., Curry, R. E., and Gilyard, G. B., 1990, “Experimental Characterization of the Effects of Pneumatic Tubing on Unsteady Pressure Measurements,” NASA Technical Memorandum 4171.
Whitmore, S. A., and Leondes, C. T., 1990, “Compensating for Pneumatic Distortion in Pressure Sensing Devices,” NASA Technical Memorandum 101716.
Stephens, R. W. B., and Bate, A. E., 1966, Acoustics and Vibrational Physics, 2nd ed., St. Martin's Press, London.
Ogata, K., 2002, Modern Control Engineering, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Burrus, C. S., Parks, T. W., and Potts, J. F., 1984, DFT/FFT and Convolution Algorithms: Theory and Implementation, Wiley, New York.
Antonini, C., Persico, G., and Rowe, A. L., 2008, “Prediction of the Dynamic Response of Complex Transmission Line Systems for Unsteady Pressure Measurements,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 19(12), p. 125401. [CrossRef]
Yoshida, M., Kondo, K., and Suzuki, M., 1992, “Fluctuating Wind Pressure Measured With Tubing System,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 42, pp. 987–998. [CrossRef]
Instrumentation and Automation Society, 2002, “A Guide for the Dynamic Calibration of Pressure Transducers,” ISA, Research Triangle Park, NC, Report No. ISA-37.16.01-2002, p. 54.
Bergh, H., and Tijdeman, H., 1965, “Theoretical and Experimental Results for the Dynamic Response of Pressure Measuring Systems,” National Aerospace Laboratory, NLR Report No. NLR-TR-F.238.
Bansevičius, R., and Kargaudas, V., 2005, “Wave Propagation in Elastic Cylindrical Tubes With Viscous and Heat-Conducting Fluid,” Ultragarsas, 3, pp. 1–10.
Stinson, M. R., 1991, “The Propagation of Plane Sound Waves in Narrow and Wide Circular Tubes, and Generalization to Uniform Tubes of Arbitrary Cross-Sectional Shape,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 89, p. 550. [CrossRef]
Whitmore, S. A., Petersen, B. J., and Scott, D. D., 1996, “A Dynamic Response Model for Pressure Sensors in Continuum and High Knudsen Number Flows With Large Temperature Gradients,” NASA Technical Memorandum 4728.
Funk, J. E., and Robe, T. R., 1970, “Transients in Pneumatic Transmission Lines Subjected to Large Pressure Changes,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 12, pp. 245–257. [CrossRef]
Gumley, S. J., 1983, “A Detailed Design Method for Pneumatic Tubing Systems,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 13, pp. 441–452. [CrossRef]
Hurst, A., and Kurtz, A., 2008, “High Temperature Static and Dynamic Pressure Transducer for Combustion Instability Control Using Acoustic Low-Pass Filter Structures,” ASME Gas Turbo Expo, Berlin, June 9–13, ASME Paper No. GT2008-51522. [CrossRef]
White, F. M., 2003, Fluid Mechanics, McGraw-Hill, Boston.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Example of pressure signal amplification and phase shift from a 1 m long pressure transmission tube (data presented above was taken using the dynamic pressure generator presented herein)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Experimental demonstration of aliasing when making pressure measurements at the end of a 1 m, 2.69 mm diameter Teflon pressure transmission line (tube) (data presented above was taken using the dynamic pressure generator presented herein)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic of spinning valve, variable mass based dynamic pressure generator

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Power spectral density plot of flush mounted reference transducer and the response from the transducer at the end of the 1 m long, 2.69 mm I.D. Teflon tube

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison of past modeling techniques with experimental results for a 2 m, 2.69 mm diameter Teflon tube

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Tube with pressure sensor at terminating end

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Model and measured data for 2.69 mm diameter Teflon tubing at lengths of 1, 2, and 5 m

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Model and measured data for 1.35 mm diameter Teflon tubing at lengths of 1, 2, and 5 m

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Model and measured data for 1.45 mm diameter Nylon tubing at lengths of 1, 2, and 5 m

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparison of past modeling techniques with new model for 2.69 mm diameter Teflon tubing 2 m long

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Model of data taken with and without 3 m of 1.35 mm tubing




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In