0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions

Assessment of a Gas Turbine NOx Reduction Potential Based on a Spatiotemporal Unmixedness Parameter

[+] Author and Article Information
Stefan Dederichs

e-mail: stefan.dederichs@partner.kit.edu

Nikolaos Zarzalis

e-mail: Nikolaos.Zarzalis@kit.edu

Peter Habisreuther

e-mail: peter.habisreuther@kit.edu
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology,
Engler-Bunte-Ring 1,
Karlsruhe 76131, Germany

Christian Beck

e-mail: beckchristian@siemens.com

Bernd Prade

e-mail: prade.bernd@siemens.com

Werner Krebs

e-mail: wernerkrebs@siemens.com
Siemens AG,
Mellinghofer Str. 55,
Muelheim an der Ruhr 45473, Germany

Contributed by the Combustion and Fuels Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 9, 2013; final manuscript received July 16, 2013; published online September 17, 2013. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 135(11), 111504 (Sep 17, 2013) (8 pages) Paper No: GTP-13-1248; doi: 10.1115/1.4025078 History: Received July 09, 2013; Revised July 16, 2013

The paper presents a one-dimensional approach to assess the reduction potential of NOx emissions for lean premixed gas turbine combustion systems. NOx emissions from these systems are known to be mainly caused by high temperatures, not only from an averaged perspective but especially related to poor mixing quality of fuel and air. The method separates the NOx chemistry in the flame front zone and the postflame zone (slow reaction). A one-dimensional treatment enables the use of detailed chemistry. A lookup table parameterized by reaction progress and equivalence ratio is used to improve the computational efficiency. The influence of mixing quality is taken into account by a probability density function of the fuel element–based equivalence ratio, which itself translates into a temperature distribution. Hence, the NOx source terms are a function of reaction progress and equivalence ratio. The reaction progress is considered by means of the two-zone approach. Based on unsteady computational fluid dynamics (CFD) data, the evolution of the probability density function with residence time has been analyzed. Two types of definitions of an unmixedness quantity are considered. One definition accounts for spatial as well as temporal fluctuations, and the other is based on the mean spatial distribution. They are determined at the location of the flame front. The paper presents a comparison of the modeled results with experimental data. A validation and application have shown very good quantitative and qualitative agreement with the measurements. The comparison of the unmixedness definitions has proven the necessity of unsteady simulations. A general emissions-unmixedness correlation can be derived for a given combustion system.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Leonard, G., and Correa, S., 1990, “NOx, Formation in Premixed High-Pressure Lean Methane Flames”, 2nd ASME Fossil Fuel Combustion Symposium, Vol. 30, ASME/PD, New York, pp. 69–74.
Steele, R., Jarrett, A., Malte, P. C., Tonouchi, J. H., and Nicol, D. G., 1997, “Variables Affecting NOx Formation in Lean-Premixed Combustion,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 119(1), pp. 102–107. [CrossRef]
Lyons, V. J., 1981, “Fuel/Air Nonuniformity-Effect on Nitric Oxide Emissions,” AIAA J., 20(5), pp. 660–665. [CrossRef]
Pompei, F., and Heywood, J. B., 1972, “The Role of Mixing in Burner-Generated Carbon Monoxide and Nitric Oxide,” Combust. Flame, 19, pp. 407–418. [CrossRef]
Zeldovich, Y. B., 1946, “The Oxidation of Nitrogen in Combustion and Explosions,” Acta Physicochim. URSS, 21, pp. 557–560.
Malte, P. C., and Pratt, D. T., 1974, “Measurement of Atomic Oxygen and Nitrogen Oxides in Jet-Stirred Combustion,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 15, pp. 1061–1070. [CrossRef]
Leonard, G., and Stegmaier, J., 1994, “Development of an Aeroderivative Gas Turbine Dry Low Emissions Combustion System,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 116, pp. 542–546. [CrossRef]
Fric, T. F., 1993, “Effects of Fuel-Air Unpremixedness on NOx Emissions,” J. Propul. Power, 9, p. 708. [CrossRef]
Biagioli, F., and Güthe, F., 2007, “Effect of Pressure and Fuel-Air Unmixedness on NOx Emissions From Industrial Gas Turbine Burners,” Combust. Flame, 151, pp. 274–288. [CrossRef]
Poinsot, T., and Veynante, D., 2005, Theoretical and Numerical Combustion, 2nd ed., Edwards, Ann Arbor, MI.
Di Domenico, M., Gerlinger, P., and Noll, B., 2011, “Numerical Simulations of Confined, Turbulent, Lean, Premixed Flames Using a Detailed Chemistry Combustion Model,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2011, Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 6–10, ASME Paper No. GT2011-45520. [CrossRef]
Oijen, J., Lammers, F., and De Goey, L., 2001, “Modeling of Complex Premixed Burner Systems by Using Flamelet-Generated Manifolds,” Combust. Flame, 127(3), pp. 2124–2134. [CrossRef]
Ketelheun, A., Olbricht, C., Hahn, F., and Janicka, J., 2010, “NO Prediction in Turbulent Flames Using LES/FGM With Additional Transport Equations,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 33, pp. 2975–2982. [CrossRef]
Gicquel, O., Darabiha, N., and Thevenin, D., 2000, “Laminar Premixed Hydrogen/Air Counterflow Flame Simulations Using Flame Prolongation of ILDM With Differential Diffusion,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 28, pp. 1901–1908. [CrossRef]
Fiorina, B., Gicquel, O., Vervisch, L., Darabiha, N., Carpentier, S., and Darabiha, N., 2005, “Approximating the Chemical Structure of Partially-Premixed and Diffusion Counter-Flow Flames Using FPI Flamelet Tabulation,” Combust. Flame, 140(3), pp. 147–160. [CrossRef]
Peters, N., 1988, “Laminar Flamelet Concepts in Turbulent Combustion,” Sym. (Int.) Combust., 21(1), pp. 1231–1250. [CrossRef]
Borghi, R., 1988, “Turbulent Combustion Modeling,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 14(4), pp. 245–292. [CrossRef]
Pope, S., 1985, “PDF Methods for Turbulent Reacting Flows,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 11, pp. 119–195. [CrossRef]
Prade, B., Strab, H., Berenbrink, P., and Schetter, B., 1996, “Development of an Improved Hybrid Burner—Initial Operating Experience in a Gas Turbine,” ASME Paper No. 96-GT-45.
Fichet, V., Kanniche, M., Plion, P., and Gicquel, O., 2010, “A Reactor Network Model for Predicting NOx Emissions in Gas Turbines,” Fuel, 89(9), pp. 2202–2210. [CrossRef]
Holdeman, J. D., Liscinsky, D. S., and Bain, D. B., 1999, “Mixing of Multiple Jets With a Confined Subsonic Crossflow: Part II—Opposed Rows of Orifices in Rectangular Ducts,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 121(3), pp. 551–562. [CrossRef]
Schneiders, T., Hoeren, A., Michalski, B., Pfost, H., Scherer, V., and Koestlin, B., 2001, “Investigation of Unsteady Gas Mixing Processes in Gas Turbine Burners Applying a Tracer-LIF Method,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo, New Orleans, LA, June 4–7, ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-0049.
Galeazzo, F. C. C., Donnert, G., Habisreuther, P., Zarzalis, N., Valdes, R. J., and Krebs, W., 2010, “Measurement and Simulation of Turbulent Mixing in a Jet in Crossflow,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 133(6), p. 061504. [CrossRef]
Ivanova, E., Noll, B., Di Domenico, M., and Aigner, M., 2009, “Unsteady Simulations of Flow Field and Scalar Mixing in Transverse Jets,” ASME Paper No. GT2009-59147. [CrossRef]
Ivanova, E., Noll, B., and Aigner, M., 2010, “Unsteady Simulations of Turbulent Mixing in Jet in Crossflow,” 40th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Chicago, June 28–July 1, AIAA Paper No. 2010-4724. [CrossRef]
Syed, K. J., Roden, K., and Martin, P., 2006, “A Novel Approach to Predicting NOx Emissions From Dry Low Emissions Gas Turbines”, ASME Turbo Expo, Barcelona, May 8–11, ASME Paper No. GT2006-90333. [CrossRef]
Lacarell, A., Göke, S., and Paschereit, C. O., 2010, “Quantitative Link Between Cold-Flow Scalar Unmixedness and NOx Emissions in a Conical Premixed Burner,” ASME Paper No. GT2010-23132. [CrossRef]
Fric, T., and Roshko, A., 1994, “Vortical Structure in the Wake of a Transverse Jet,” J. Fluid Mech., 279, pp. 1–47. [CrossRef]
Rutar, T., Martin, S. M., Nicol, D. G., Malte, P. C., and Pratt, D. T., 1997, “Effects of Incomplete Premixing on NOx Formation at Temperature and Pressure Conditions of LP Combustion Turbines,” ASME Paper No. 97-GT-335.
Correa, S. M., and Braaten, M. E., 1993, “Parallel Simulations of Partially Stirred Methane Combustion,” Combust. Flame, 94, pp. 469–486. [CrossRef]
“GRI-Mech Home Page”, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, http://www.me.berkeley.edu/gri-mech/index.html
Mongia, R. K., Tomita, E., Hsu, F. K., Talbot, L., and Dibble, R. W., 1996, “Use of an Optical Probe for Time-Resolved In Situ Measurement of Local Air-to-Fuel Ratio and Extent of Fuel Mixing With Applications to Low NOx Emissions in Premixed Gas Turbines,” Sym. (Int.) Combust., 26, pp. 2749–2755. [CrossRef]
Burgess, D., 1962, “Structure and Propagation of Turbulent Bunsen Flames,” Bureau of Mines, Bulletin No. 604.
Forney, L. J., and Nafia, N., 1998, “Turbulent Jet Reactors: Mixing Time Scales,” Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 76, pp. 728–736. [CrossRef]
Pierce, C., and Moin, P., 1998, “A Dynamic Model for Subgrid-Scale Variance and Dissipation Rate of a Conserved Scalar,” Phys. Fluids, 10(12), pp. 3041–3044. [CrossRef]
Kern, M., Fokaides, P., Habisreuther, P., and Zarzalis, N., 2009, “Applicability of a Flamelet and a Presumed JPDF 2-Domain-1-Step-Kinetic Turbulent Reaction Model for the Simulation of a Lifted Swirl Flame,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2009: Power for Land, Sea and Air, Orlando, FL, June 8–12, ASME Paper No. GT2009-59435. [CrossRef]
Carroni, R., Griffin, T., Mantzaras, J., and Reinke, M., 2003, “High-Pressure Experiments and Modeling of Methane/Air Catalytic Combustion for Power-Generation Applications,” Catal. Today, 83, pp. 157–170. [CrossRef]
Semendjajew, K. A., 2008, Taschenbuch der Mathematik, Harri Deutsch Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Exemplary sketch of a technical combustion system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

NOx source term and temperature as a function of the laminar flame spread for two exemplary equivalence ratios; natural gas at a pressure of 8 bar

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

CFD-based probability (sampled over a generic flame front) compared to the modeled probability density function (Gaussian PDF)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Contour plot of mean isoresidence time; time starts at a reaction progress of 0.5; coordinates normalized with the premixing passage diameter

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Normalized postflame standard deviation versus residence time; CFD marks obtained at instantaneous isotime surfaces; model is obtained by a regression

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Calculated emissions versus experimental data from Biagioli and Güthe [9]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Measured NOx emissions related to different CFD-based unmixedness parameters and comparison against the modeled emissions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Distribution of spatial, spatiotemporal, and transient-spatial unmixedness over the time

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In